i am honestly thinking you went mad.
keep in mind i know simon ... so when you say he got your photobucket accounts deleted, i know that's a pretty skewed perspective.
just HOW do you think he "did this" to you? sending a complaint to photobucket? hacking photobucket and deleting the pictures? it is bizarre that you think he is responsible unless you think he is some high level shill of some kind. in which case, what would tell you this? i'm just curious.
I just received this tantrum from that user in my youtube mail.
Oh you're "just curious"? Can you be any more disingenuous?
Go fuck yourself you lying filth. My cousin got murdered and 4 days later you scumbags drag it into the forum, pronounce her photos fake and demand I deny she ever existed. You disgusting lowlifes. You discuss the size of her breasts. You don't give a fuck about the truth. And you definitely can't tell what's real because she is you 2-faced piece of sh#t. You don't even bother looking into it.
Simon lied about what I really said. He needed to lie to bolster his phony accusation. Neither of you can or will admit you're wrong. The Vicsim Report hasn't been shown true at any time. Every fake victim is an image of a real person, however altered. Every fucking one we ever looked at. You're so married to your theory - it was a fucking theory - that you insist it's necessarily true even when we discover the actors. You're covering for them as if nobody could ever be blamed since they're entirely digital.
In the same hour that I posted a challenge on Simon's channel both my photobucket accounts get deleted. And you faggots pretend it's impossible that Simon could've simply complained and done it? It only takes a fucking complaint. "That guy uploaded photos of my victim parents and I'm horrified!"
And then you pretend I must be somebody else? Fuck you. You're either a perp or a fucking idiot.
Allow me some commentary here.
Oh you're "just curious"? Can you be any more disingenuous? [Incidentally, I was just curious. 11September2009 answers my question about how he thinks it happened in the next paragraph, but not before calling me a host of unnecessary names.]
Go fuck yourself you lying filth. [I am lying? In what way am I lying? Let's see if he explains.] My cousin got murdered and 4 days later you scumbags drag it into the forum [Actually, what happened is Ozzy personally messaged us using the board's system about this "cousin" of his getting murdered. He then said he 'prepared [him]self' for our skeptical response. So, it's strange that he would try to turn it around on us.], pronounce her photos fake and demand I deny she ever existed.[We never "demanded" he make a judgement. I understand he is using rhetorical language here, but this is untrue. You can read it for yourself on this forum what happened. He dodged all our questions, answering as curtly as possible, then boiled over when we banned him.] You disgusting lowlifes. You discuss the size of her breasts. [Simon made a case for the possibility that this "cousin's" head was pasted on different bodies. The breasts were the most outstanding difference between the bodies.] You don't give a fuck about the truth. [Untrue. We do care, which is why we challenged Ozzy on producing better proof of this person's so-called existence.] And you definitely can't tell what's real because she is you 2-faced piece of sh#t. [Regardless, no proof was produced, whether she is "real" or not. So are we to look at tampered pictures which look suspicious to us and just swallow them? That's the same thing we have been asked to do by the 9/11 perps for over nine years.] You don't even bother looking into it.[I don't suppose he thinks when we ask him direct questions about his "cousin" we are showing disinterest in looking into it? This is a bizarre accusation, one that could only be made by someone misreading, deliberately or accidentally, everything we posted to him.]
Simon lied about what I really said. He needed to lie to bolster his phony accusation. Neither of you can or will admit you're wrong. [Simon did admit he put Ozzy's quote inside his own rhetoric. That wasn't Simon's "lie". It was sarcasm. This 11September2009 is clearly trying to sway the entire conversation by throwing needless doubt on what we ask of people. We don't ask that people trust us. We ask that people do research for themselves. How exactly would any arrogance we show in our research reflect on what other people find?] The Vicsim Report hasn't been shown true at any time. Every fake victim is an image of a real person, however altered. Every fucking one we ever looked at. [This is a new one on me! If each and every fake person is actually sourced from a real person, such as an actor, it would have to be shown that every single vicsim picture matches an actor. I haven't found this to be the case as much as the idea that different faces were mashed up together to create multiple sims though I wouldn't rule it out. Ozzy - however - makes me want to "rule it out" based on his vehement insistence of its veracity. He has never stated the theory "every fake victim is an image of a real person definitely" before on this forum. Not once. He definitely made it a mission to find actors and connect them to vicsim pictures, and we thought it was good and/or amusing. We tried coaxing him to explain some of his posts at times and he would not elaborate. He did tell us to "bow down" to his ideas. This might have been rhetoric, but the "angry" cover is not working so well now that he is acting dodgy.] You're so married to your theory - it was a fucking theory - that you insist it's necessarily true even when we discover the actors. You're covering for them as if nobody could ever be blamed since they're entirely digital.[This has never been true. We have carefully weighed the possibility of actors and fabricated people used together or the idea that it's all invented. This accusation should have been layed on us at this forum where we could actually discuss it, instead of in the context of a ridiculous e-mail accusing us of being shills. In my opinion. For the record, it would be unfortunate if all the people who willingly submitted their faces got off the hook, but it is a possibility however unpleasant the idea.]
In the same hour that I posted a challenge on Simon's channel both my photobucket accounts get deleted. [This might be true, but what reason do we have to believe Simon is involved? Why would anyone instantly blame Simon for it after he has been the one exposing TV fakery most prominently for several years? Ozzy's accusation doesn't make sense except in the context of someone trying to make trouble for Simon deliberately. I think Ozzy is a shill, trying to discredit us and he is trying to make us feel "threatened" by explaining his bad story in a private message and testing it out. It doesn't fly with me. You guys can be the judge.] And you faggots pretend it's impossible that Simon could've simply complained and done it? It only takes a fucking complaint. "That guy uploaded photos of my victim parents and I'm horrified!" [Although it might take nothing more than just such a complaint to do that, again why would Simon? When has Simon ever done such an action before? Never once since I've known him. Has he ever tried to censor other people's research? He usually makes videos and posts about them.]
And then you pretend I must be somebody else?[Who is pretending anything of the sort? Simon and I and Fred were trying to figure out who all the channels were posting Ozzy-like content. At some point, Ozzy said 'this must be my friend Rachel, I'm not sure who is behind that channel' when referring to one of them. Now, he claims he is behind all of them. Were we all just confused? Or was the ambiguity undecided yet? Later he called us idiots for not being able to tell.] Fuck you. You're either a perp or a fucking idiot.[I am neither, thank you.]
I am increasingly relieved that we found out Ozzy was a shill when he gave himself away with this weird and revealing my-dead-cousin-was-real-ARargrghhh#%&@ incident. So this is what we get for doubting him after all this time?
It might behoove us to re-examine what he's been posting in the last few years and see if it's so solid. It might be that he is trying to connect all the vicsims to "actors" in order to distract from the software or corporations who made them. Or, it is all actors. Or some actors, and he is just assigned to confuse and anger people. I am not sure.
Anyway, his behavior in connection to a vicsim is not a good sign. Most likely, his "real" name given to us is "safe" information for him as an agent to give. Pity about him. Let's move on.