OK, FG, you're right, sorry about that, now that's fixed (by admitting I was paraphrasing your quote) as you rightly requested.
I called out sunshine05 and TripleSpeak, for both not knowing CluesForum proved all the 9/11 footage is CGI & all the victims faked.
I called out Nonhocapito & Flabbergasted, for their surprising defense of empires in general and the American empire specifically.
I called out Hoi, for saying that it would be "warmongering" of us to dream of identifying and bringing to justice murderous war-initiators.
And (although I am thoroughly convinced the Tychos model is absolutely correct) I even boldly told my hero Simon that if star parallax official data matches the Heliocentric "Earth annually RESETS back to original position" story, then star parallax official data is probably all forged and should not be depended on as proof of the truth of the Tychos model.
Meaning, the Tychos model would require the official world's-largest super-duper-telescope controllers to start honestly taking pictures at the correct times of the correct stars for correct comparisons (namely, comparing the year-to-year-to-year photos of summer-equinox summer-quadrant midnight-directly-up 'close-stars') (and, comparing the year-to-year-to-year photos of winter-equinox winter-quadrant midnight-directly-up 'close-stars') and then sharing such actual non-forged images (good luck getting them to do that) which would show, if Tychos is correct and if nanometer parallax is actually able to be photographed:
"Wow, no annual reset, the summer-equinox summer-quadrant midnight-directly-up 'close-stars' show
an EVER-INCREASING amount of parallax when compared to the 'far-stars' a nanometer to their side:
comparison: summer 2020 vs. summer 2021 WestwardPositive apparent-relative-movement of y,
comparison: summer 2020 vs. summer 2022 WestwardPositive apparent-relative-movement of 2y,
comparison: summer 2020 vs. summer 2023 WestwardPositive apparent-relative-movement of 3y
comparison: summer 2020 vs. summer 2024 WestwardPositive apparent-relative-movement of 4y,
comparison: summer 2020 vs. summer 2025 WestwardPositive apparent-relative-movement of 5y."
"Wow, no annual reset, the winter-equinox winter-quadrant midnight-directly-up 'close-stars' show
an EVER-INCREASING amount of parallax when compared to the 'far-stars' a nanometer to their side:
comparison: winter 2020 vs. winter 2021 EastwardNegative apparent-relative-movement of y,
comparison: winter 2020 vs. winter 2022 EastwardNegative apparent-relative-movement of 2y,
comparison: winter 2020 vs. winter 2023 EastwardNegative apparent-relative-movement of 3y,
comparison: winter 2020 vs. winter 2024 EastwardNegative apparent-relative-movement of 4y,
comparison: winter 2020 vs. winter 2025 EastwardNegative apparent-relative-movement of 5y."
"Wow, Earth doesn't do a circle each year, Earth moves 14,036km per year in basically a straight line,
basically straight towards the autumn-quadrant and basically straight away from the spring-quadrant,
so that's why autumn-equinox autumn-quadrant midnight-directly-up 'close-stars' never show parallax,
- and that's why spring-equinox spring-quadrant midnight-directly-up 'close-stars' never show parallax,
& this line which seems basically straight for thousands of years is really a 25,344 year perfect circle!"
Either the largest-telescope-controllers see exactly that, so they forge all "annual-parallax-reset data",
or... the largest-telescope-controllers see ZERO parallax, so they forge all "annual-parallax-reset data".
Either way, I think Simon you should stick to the "observable by regular folks" Tychos evidence points:
the Tychos "every-546-day Mars-DeltaCapricorni-alignment" (impossible according the Copernican model) proof, the Tychos "every-816-day Venus-Regulus-alignment" (impossible according the Copernican model) proof, the Tychos "sun's noontime direct-over-head latitude location changing twice as fast from February 21st to April 21st than it does between April 21st to June 21st" (impossible according the Copernican model) proof, and the Tychos "Stellar Precession's annual arcseconds amount continuously increasing every year" (impossible according the Copernican model) proof.
Wow, I sure have made a lot of BOLD posts recently, but I still think what I have written is all logical, so as always, if there are any logic mistakes in my 110 posts, please show which specific points are incorrect. Thanks for your kind consideration.
search.php?&author=Observer