Mason seems to be making a miraculous recovery, as is his companion. Someone should really wipe that goup off the side of his head.
https://www.lds.org/church/news/injured ... h?lang=eng
This quote from one of Mason's doctors made 17 hours ago, does not jive with this picture:
"Dr. Giavonni Lewis said Mason Wells has deep second-degree burns to his face and additional burns on his hands. Lewis said Joseph Empey is also recovering from second-degree burns, but Empey should not need surgery. An orthopedic doctor is looking at Empey's foot to determine the extent of the damage caused by shrapnel.
Lewis said Wells will likely require skin grafts and other surgical procedures in the future."
http://www.heraldextra.com/news/local/f ... a83a0.html
Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016
Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016
Can anyone get a close up on the ads in the back?
One of the telltale signs , to me at least, that these events are totallt staged and there are no real victims is the lack of any real "amateur" photos taken from cellphones that actually show a victim in context, i,e, not the staged reuters type that we seen all over the media ad infinitum.
Here is the only picture that I could find that actually shows anything that should resembles a bomb blast or anything that matches the "witness" statements describing blood and bodies everywhere.
Image
I believe it to be a fake, but perhaps others that have more expertise can do a proper photo forensic analysis?
I am also wondering about the time frame; how does the above photo jive with the other photos we have seen showing nothing but ceiling tiles on the floor. Were those photos taken after the so called dead and injured were removed? Who could have had access after the authorities "sealed" the crime scene?
regards,
Steve O
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 1247
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 12:19 am
Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016
Zoom on the body with the funny head (from a slightly larger version of the image):omaxsteve wrote:Here is the only picture that I could find that actually shows anything that should resembles a bomb blast or anything that matches the "witness" statements describing blood and bodies everywhere.
http://imgur.com/uGBz8CL
Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016
These 2 pictures helped me enormously to orient myself in the building. I found them here but the ones I embed here have much better quality. They are supposedly taken about 24 hours after the explosions. In the part of the building that was damaged by the second (strongest) explosion.
The caption says "Op deze plek ontplofte de tweede bom, het bloed zou van de tweede terrorist zijn." translation: " At this spot the second bomb exploded. The blood is alleged to be from the second terrorist." On the left you can see the beginning of the pedestal of the statue that is shown on some other photos. As I have shown earlier you see almost no damage to the infrastructure. For example, in the Samsonite shop all the glass seems intact.
What I find odd is that they are (still) saying the second bomb detonated near the Starbucks cafe. On this photo you can see the cafe on the foreground, but the second bomb allegedly went off on the far end, near the blue letters (Samsonite). You can see that part is very dark, so no direct sunlight is able to reach it. But then how could the explosion damage the windows? We are told all the windows are either broken or were blasted out completely. On the left side of the statue, we can see the entrance to the part of the building that is shaped like half of a dodecagon (as we can see on photos taken from the outside).
That part of the building is shielded from the centre of the explosion by a wall. Yet on photos taken from the outside we see some broken windows.
The caption says "Op deze plek ontplofte de tweede bom, het bloed zou van de tweede terrorist zijn." translation: " At this spot the second bomb exploded. The blood is alleged to be from the second terrorist." On the left you can see the beginning of the pedestal of the statue that is shown on some other photos. As I have shown earlier you see almost no damage to the infrastructure. For example, in the Samsonite shop all the glass seems intact.
What I find odd is that they are (still) saying the second bomb detonated near the Starbucks cafe. On this photo you can see the cafe on the foreground, but the second bomb allegedly went off on the far end, near the blue letters (Samsonite). You can see that part is very dark, so no direct sunlight is able to reach it. But then how could the explosion damage the windows? We are told all the windows are either broken or were blasted out completely. On the left side of the statue, we can see the entrance to the part of the building that is shaped like half of a dodecagon (as we can see on photos taken from the outside).
That part of the building is shielded from the centre of the explosion by a wall. Yet on photos taken from the outside we see some broken windows.
Last edited by Seneca on Sat Apr 02, 2016 2:08 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016
Another photo from the entrance posted on facebook on 8:10.
Here nobody is running away, most people are standing. One black figure on the left is even walking toward the building.
Here nobody is running away, most people are standing. One black figure on the left is even walking toward the building.
Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016
No "Heads' of NATO" among the "casualties" and of course the EU pricks were on Easter Holidays so nobody of any significance yet again. A quiet time at the Airport, good time for another hoax.
We re to believe that there are hoards of suicide bombers queuing up to kill themselves for NOTHING. A couple of busted cheap Styrofoam ceiling tiles in the Departure area. Is that really Brussels airport? Remind me never to fly to Belgium.
We re to believe that there are hoards of suicide bombers queuing up to kill themselves for NOTHING. A couple of busted cheap Styrofoam ceiling tiles in the Departure area. Is that really Brussels airport? Remind me never to fly to Belgium.
Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016
We are also supposed to believe that people who are injured in bombings, shootings, etc., are not the least bit angry with their attackers. No, these "events" just make them realize that there are good people out there who are there to help and to love (?) and they guess that the world is not too bad.
This is another missionary who was with Mason Wells - Fanny Clain. Another amazing recovery. Odd that she begins the interview speaking in French but then switches to English. The takeaway is that life is good, especially during bombings and unforeseen carnage!
https://www.yahoo.com/news/video/brusse ... 08754.html
This is another missionary who was with Mason Wells - Fanny Clain. Another amazing recovery. Odd that she begins the interview speaking in French but then switches to English. The takeaway is that life is good, especially during bombings and unforeseen carnage!
https://www.yahoo.com/news/video/brusse ... 08754.html
Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016
What's with the floor in the first picture? It's nothing like the floor tiles in the second picture. It actually looks like concrete, what you may find outside the terminal, not like the inside of any airport I have ever seen.Seneca wrote:These 2 pictures helped me enormously to orient myself in the building. I found them here but the ones I embed here have much better quality. They are supposedly taken about 24 hours after the explosions. In the part of the building that was damaged by the second (strongest) explosion.
The caption says "Op deze plek ontplofte de tweede bom, het bloed zou van de tweede terrorist zijn." translation: " At this spot the second bomb exploded. The blood is alleged to be from the second terrorist." On the left you can see the beginning of the pedestal of the statue that is shown on some other photos. As I have shown earlier you see almost no damage to the infrastructure. For example, in the Samsonite shop all the glass seems intact.
What I find odd is that they are (still) saying the second bomb detonated near the Starbucks cafe. On this photo you can see the cafe on the foreground, but the second bomb allegedly went off on the far end, near the blue letters (Samsonite). You can see that part is very dark, so no direct sunlight is able to reach it. But then how could the explosion damage the windows? We are told all the windows are either broken or were blasted out completely. On the left side of the statue, we can see the entrance to the part of the building that is shaped like half of a dodecagon (as we can see on photos taken from the outside).
That part of the building is shielded from the centre of the explosion by a wall. Yet on photos taken from the outside we see some broken windows.
Regards,
Steve O. I
-
- Member
- Posts: 5060
- Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:24 pm
Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016
This looks a bit like the Den Haag train station after a rough Queen's Day.
Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016
As suspected, new security rules in Brussels will film us coming to the airport and control us OUTSIDE the departure hall, no friends or family allowed inside,,,,
•vehicles and passengers will be screened on the access road, special cameras check number plates
•additional police check and ID and boarding pass at the entrance (outside) the temporary departures area, those not flying not allowed in
---
---
article: BBC news
airport security guide: Brussels Airport
•vehicles and passengers will be screened on the access road, special cameras check number plates
•additional police check and ID and boarding pass at the entrance (outside) the temporary departures area, those not flying not allowed in
---
---
article: BBC news
airport security guide: Brussels Airport
Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016
omaxsteve wrote:One of the telltale signs , to me at least, that these events are totallt staged and there are no real victims is the lack of any real "amateur" photos taken from cellphones that actually show a victim in context, i,e, not the staged reuters type that we seen all over the media ad infinitum.
Here is the only picture that I could find that actually shows anything that should resembles a bomb blast or anything that matches the "witness" statements describing blood and bodies everywhere.
I believe it to be a fake, but perhaps others that have more expertise can do a proper photo forensic analysis?
I am also wondering about the time frame; how does the above photo jive with the other photos we have seen showing nothing but ceiling tiles on the floor. Were those photos taken after the so called dead and injured were removed? Who could have had access after the authorities "sealed" the crime scene?
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_lHyfl52t8
Here is an interview with Jef Versele, alleged author of 6 photos and the video that you see at the beginning of the interview. All were posted on facebook at 8:10, about 15 minutes after the attack. The video was taken near the center of the second bomb blast, to the right on Steve's photo. There are no uniformed persons visible, so logically it should have been taken before that photo. What you see on the video is very different from what is told in the interview. "immediately there was panic so people were shouting and running around" and "people were on the floor, people were injured" (twice)
In the video we see about 10 people, (including the filmer who is unable to keep his hand out of the picture.) Nobody seems wounded, nobody is laying on the floor, sitting down or hiding, like we see on another video. Nobody seems in panic. Only 2 of the 10 people are walking toward the exit, the rest is standing or strolling around. At least 2 people are looking at their cell-phone. One other man is seen filming (with his back towards the supposed center of the explosion).
Since this bomb is supposed to be the strongest, we would expect at least half of the casualties to be in this area (of the total of 17 dead and 81 wounded). Where are all those people? ? You hear some screaming but it sounds far away. Edit: note also that you don't see any smoke or dust on this video
Can anybody recognize the accent of the man being interviewed? It is supposed to be Flemish but I am not convinced. And both the voice and the accent sound different then on this video of Jef Versele 2 years earlier.
Last edited by Seneca on Mon Apr 04, 2016 4:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Member
- Posts: 557
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:34 am
- Contact:
Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016
I watch so little news now that I haven't seen any footage of this event! Suffice to say, that it does appear to smell to high heaven again.
Just love the way the lady ignore poor old long legs laying on the floor looking up for help! The photo of bra lady and red hand is, without a doubt, photoshopped. Great observations there.
For those who are not familiar with peekay 22's work, I suggest you look at his Boston Bombing channel. I don't know if it is all his own work, but he rips it to shreds - no pun intended!
Just love the way the lady ignore poor old long legs laying on the floor looking up for help! The photo of bra lady and red hand is, without a doubt, photoshopped. Great observations there.
For those who are not familiar with peekay 22's work, I suggest you look at his Boston Bombing channel. I don't know if it is all his own work, but he rips it to shreds - no pun intended!
-
- Member
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:15 pm
Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016
I maybe wrong Seneca, but if the below video link, which apparently shows the Brussels Airport explosion seconds after blast featured on ABC news, is for real then it would appear a section of the ceiling was removed nowhere near the initial explosion. Suggesting an explosion at ground level didn't take the ceiling down.Seneca wrote:.kickstones wrote: Here's 2 videos out there which appear to confirm an exposion at ceiling level.
It is a fake video that allegdly shows a controlled explosion. You hear a voice saying "Dat is een gecontroleerde explosie".(That is a controlled explosion)
How do you conclude the explosion is at ceiling level?
Video Shows Brussels Airport Explosion Seconds After Blast
http://abcnews.go.com/International/vid ... t-37925314
Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016
I'm sorry, I refuse to watch "videos" from the Anti-Social Media, but if that image is anything to go by, I'd say it was a five minute job in Blender.
Re: Brussels Airport and Metro attack March 22 2016
I agree that the damage that is shown to the roof is not consistent with explosions at floor level. So the roof tiles are CGI or they were put there in another way (explosion in ceiling?). It could be a combination of CGI and real objects. My guess is that it is all CGI.kickstones wrote: I maybe wrong Seneca, but if the below video link, which apparently shows the Brussels Airport explosion seconds after blast featured on ABC news, is for real then it would appear a section of the ceiling was removed nowhere near the initial explosion. Suggesting an explosion at ground level didn't take the ceiling down.
Notice that on this video "seconds after the first blast", you don't see any casualties, not even people in panic. Just like on the other video after the second blast. So of the purported 98 casualties only 1 can be located near the center of the explosion, the guy with the funny head. (The basketball player with the funny legs is lying somewhere else.)