hoi.polloi wrote:Very interesting and relevant to media fakery:
Jews own most of the media. That's a big problem. Jews influence Christian/Anglo beliefs in order to weaken them. Jews circumcise babies and drink baby penis blood, which possibly traumatizes them and makes them more susceptible to psychological influence of some kind.
Thank you, Hoi, for recognizing that this thread is raising some very interesting points and for summarizing them. And most of all for saying that they are relevant to media fakery, admittedly the main subject of this forum. In fact, all I want is to concentrate on them. And it would be great if you and other members, who are certainly more experienced and capable than me, could also help me investigating them (and others that may arise) by contributing their precious research, like Flabbergasted and Seneca are doing, for example. Because when I started this thread I thought this was going to be a collaborative effort, while most of the time here I feel as if, since I started the thread, it were my "duty" to do most of the research and also counter all the criticism that arises. Well, sorry folks, but if that's the case, I can't keep up, both because I have my limitations (which I hoped you could help me overcome or at least improve) and because I can't do this full time.
So let's get back to business. Already the first point makes all the relevance in the world, because here we know better than most people that, since the advent and exponentially rapid development of mass media, you don't really need to conquer the world militarily. All you really need is to influence and control people's perception of the world. Particularly revealing examples of this are the ones we're exposing here as products of media fakery, like serial killers, crazy bombers and other "lone nuts", or A-bombs. It's not necessary for all these things, and similar others, to really exist, as long as the mass of people believes they exist and is afraid of them. And we all know this all too well here.
Therefore, it would be safe to assume that whoever controls the media controls the world, right? Then let's look at who could be controlling the media. And before looking in the darkest corners for obscure conspiracies, I suggest to look to what's in front of our eyes (hence the "open" adjective). In fact, there is an ethnic group of people who says it plainly all the time: "We control the media". And nobody here seems to question that there is a Jewish control of the media, although some people have raised the possibility that there might be another group of people who hides behind the Jews. Well, that could be, but before investigating that possibility I'd like to verify if things can be taken at face value or not. After all, if you're investigating a homicide and somebody comes in saying "I'm the killer", you can't avoid making him at least a suspect and verifying his claims before discarding them, right? So that's what I'm trying to do here: investigate to discover if certain claims of a group of people who identify themselves as Jews can be true or not.
And since some people here (most notably Selene, I think) ask to specify who could be the "Jews" we're talking about here, I'll give you my working definition.
First of all, let me make this absolutely clear: I firmly believe people of all "races" are all essentially human beings with equal dignity and importance. We're all different waves of the same sea of humanity, and deep down we're all the same. The superficial differences between us are given either by nature (different sexes, different skin colors and physical traits, etc.) or by different forms of conditioning (call it cultural, religious or whatever you like).
The second category is what interests me here, because my contention is that we can consider "Jewish" all people who have been subjected to the influence of Jewish culture and religion since birth or later in life. Of course, it can be said that people who have been subjected to this conditioning since birth didn't have a choice at the time, but maybe later they have either confirmed their conditioning or denied it.
I greatly admire people who question their own conditioning, if they find it unfit or morally wrong, but often it's not enough to deny it consciously, because even if you do so it could still have an unconscious effect, especially if it was instilled in people at such an early age that they couldn't process it consciously.
That's why I wanted to start this examination of "Jewish" conditioning from the practice of ritual circumcision on eight-days old infants. I'm not referring to medical circumcision, and especially not to that practiced on older people who had the opportunity to choose it more consciously at an older age, so please don't give me statistics on how many Americans are cirumcised, because they're not relevant to my point.
Somebody also arose the question: why are you concentrating on the Jewish religion? There are mainly two reasons for that, which I’ve already stated, but maybe I can do it more clearly here:
1) Jewish religion and culture is the religion of culture of the group of people who say themselves proudly that they control the media, and hence the world through its perception of reality
2) It seems to me, through my limited knowledge of the Talmud, that this religion creates an extremely dangerous mindset of violent and profoundly racist "elitism" that could easily legitimate a "world domination".
So I strongly contend that this kind of investigation into a certain mindset is totally relevant to the main theme of media fakery. Of course, we're not investigating specific "media hoaxes" here (perhaps we will, but there are already lots of threads here that do just that), but we're trying to understand why these hoaxes are created and who seems to benefit more from their results.
Having said this clearly (I hope), in my future posts I want to concentrate on the other two points (how Jews "influence Christian/Anglo beliefs in order to weaken them", and how certain traumas could make people who are subjected to them practically at birth "more susceptible to psychological influence of some kind", as Hoi put it. And I want to do it with links and quotes resulting from my research, of course.
As soon as possible I will continue with the latter point: the trauma of circumcision as capable of facilitating subsequent conditioning imparted through religious scriptures. Please, just give me the time and space to do that. And by all means, do it yourselves too (as some of you are already doing here, including Hoi in his latest, very interesting posts, which I've just read), if you think there might be something important to discover. And if you don't think so, I hope you can respect me anyway. After all, there are so many threads here that it's virtually impossible for everybody to be interested in all of them.