Dale Cregan 09/18/2011
Email response from 'Jon Kelly'
I'm having trouble logging in to my gmail account since receiving this message...But only with the browser I used to send the email..
John Mather photographer
Good work Reichstag Fireman!
John Mather is another of the photographers...
http://www.imageviewphotography.co.uk/index.html - email: [email protected]
https://twitter.com/John_Mather
Having found his Twitter account, I was intrigued to find the following comments:
Above: Bingo. We have the right man (or maybe sim).
Above: Very telling. I have to get in touch with John Mather!
Above: More confirmation that this is the correct 'photographer' (whoever it is).
I will interrogate this guy on Twitter and let you know what he says. In the meantime, the name Gerard Tubb rang a bell:
Eek. Sounds awful. I knew I was onto something!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... cking.html
...in 2008 its North of England correspondent, Gerard Tubb, accessed emails belonging to John Darwin, the so-called ‘canoe man’ who faked his own death in 2002.
Below, Gerard Tubb's biography on the Sky website:
http://skynews.skypressoffice.co.uk/bio ... erard-tubb
Gerard Tubb's alleged email hacking (in other PSYOPs?) is being used in another fraudulent PSYOP, the Leveson Inquiry:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/ap ... gy-hacking
John Mather is another of the photographers...
http://www.imageviewphotography.co.uk/index.html - email: [email protected]
https://twitter.com/John_Mather
Having found his Twitter account, I was intrigued to find the following comments:
Above: Bingo. We have the right man (or maybe sim).
Above: Very telling. I have to get in touch with John Mather!
Above: More confirmation that this is the correct 'photographer' (whoever it is).
I will interrogate this guy on Twitter and let you know what he says. In the meantime, the name Gerard Tubb rang a bell:
Eek. Sounds awful. I knew I was onto something!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... cking.html
...in 2008 its North of England correspondent, Gerard Tubb, accessed emails belonging to John Darwin, the so-called ‘canoe man’ who faked his own death in 2002.
Below, Gerard Tubb's biography on the Sky website:
http://skynews.skypressoffice.co.uk/bio ... erard-tubb
Gerard Tubb's alleged email hacking (in other PSYOPs?) is being used in another fraudulent PSYOP, the Leveson Inquiry:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/ap ... gy-hacking
-
- Member
- Posts: 465
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 1:09 am
Re: Deleted pictures and Jon Kelly (again)
I'll echo that!brianv wrote:Why would Simon take the photos down? That is the lamest excuse I ever heard! Yeah, he especially came off vacation to edit your posts! Fuck off!Euphoria wrote:I wondered the same thing. But I went into 'Edit,' pasted the individual links from Photobucket back in, pressed 'Submit' - and said images magically re-appeared! Unless Simon Shack himself took them down, it would appear they were somehow blocked. Very strange.reichstag fireman wrote:And why are half the pictures you uploaded less than 24 hours ago already deleted? Who deleted them, and why?
And pretty dirty to blame the absent owner of this forum for the not-so-mysterious disappearance of images in YOUR photobucket account.
What do you hope to achieve from phoning the BBC and other propaganda outlets in these PSYOPs? Are you hoping others will follow suit?
Are you really expecting the hoaxers to break down when confronted by your banal accusations?
BBC News Editor "Margaret Ryan" (real or imagined) just ain't the sort to burst into tears, and confess all. That's why they employ her!
Your insincerity pierces through the fog of deception, Euphoria.
Re: Deleted pictures and Jon Kelly (again)
Hold it right there. I did not 'blame' anyone. The images disappeared - only Simon, or an outsider, could be responsible. Furthermore, I was not aware Simon was on vacation.reichstag fireman wrote:I'll echo that!
And pretty dirty to blame the absent owner of this forum for the not-so-mysterious disappearance of images in YOUR photobucket account.
As I explained before, the pictures did NOT disappear from my actual Photobucket account. They just stopped appearing in this forum until I repasted the links and re-submitted the post.
No. It's my own personal choice. For me, it feels better than doing nothing. Maybe I can encourage them to reconsider their values, their career choices? I'm not expecting them to fall apart. I would never instruct anybody to follow my example - certainly they shouldn't give out their real name or personal details. My recording/s are included for information and entertainment purposes only!reichstag fireman wrote:What do you hope to achieve from phoning the BBC and other propaganda outlets in these PSYOPs? Are you hoping others will follow suit?
I think we just have to agree that no two researchers will have exactly the same perspective, or approach.reichstag fireman wrote:BBC News Editor "Margaret Ryan" (real or imagined)
Not everybody who works for the BBC is a sim, Fireman! I could accuse you of trolling for implying that all photographers/journalists are sims until proven otherwise. But I don't raise such criticism because it's ridiculous. I put my recording up because I found Ryan's reaction very telling - and she was very keen to get my name (which I didn't give to her) and 'organisation.' I thought it would be an interesting experiment. I'm not telling others to follow suit.
If other researchers want to carry on navel-gaving forever, while the British government continues to get away with murder (and conspiracy to murder) then that's their choice. In the meantime, aliens/space lizards, New Age solutions, denial of vicsims, random accusations of mental illness or trollery, are not for me. I'm no shill. I just think you are tad over-suspicious. Anyway, I look forward to seeing more of your good research!
Re: Deleted pictures and Jon Kelly (again)
Maybe it is a bug in the navigator (I use Firefox). When I don´t see the images, I press "quote" and then "preview", and the images appear!Euphoria wrote:I wondered the same thing. But I went into 'Edit,' pasted the individual links from Photobucket back in, pressed 'Submit' - and said images magically re-appeared!reichstag fireman wrote:And why are half the pictures you uploaded less than 24 hours ago already deleted? Who deleted them, and why?
Unless Simon Shack himself took them down, it would appear they were somehow blocked. Very strange.
Re: Dale Cregan 09/18/2011
You hold it right there!
And about your calls to the scum bbc - Jeff Hill anyone?
You are blaming Simon again for your own incompetence? That's the stuff of playgrounds. Your slip is showing!The images disappeared - only Simon, or an outsider, could be responsible.
And about your calls to the scum bbc - Jeff Hill anyone?
-
- Member
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:00 pm
Re: Dale Cregan 09/18/2011
I'm John Mather photographer seeing as Ive been brought into this topic(hope you like the ironic username)Ive registered.The member who has posted my Twitter account and email denied being part of any David Icke style fringe group to me onTwitter yet here he is.
His promised "interrogation" never materialised so maybe some here would like to step up in his place?
Also the bizarre(normal for this forum it seems) claims of photo manipulation are untrue. I worked on this news story and have similair pictures to ones published here.
This maybe my only post ,I only registered to address stupid claims happy to answer any conspiracy theories.
His promised "interrogation" never materialised so maybe some here would like to step up in his place?
Also the bizarre(normal for this forum it seems) claims of photo manipulation are untrue. I worked on this news story and have similair pictures to ones published here.
This maybe my only post ,I only registered to address stupid claims happy to answer any conspiracy theories.
Re: Deleted pictures and Jon Kelly (again)
That's what I thought at the time. But it seems, everybody else experienced it too.agraposo wrote:Maybe it is a bug in the navigator (I use Firefox). When I don´t see the images, I press "quote" and then "preview", and the images appear!
Re: Dale Cregan 09/18/2011
What is a "david icke fringe group"? Is that something like the bbc? We'd be delighted to look over your pictures which you may post here including their Exif data, and they will be duly examined. Another thing, we don't do conspiracies here [we leave that for the mainstream clowns] only hoaxes like "9/11" and "7/7" and a raft of others.Photographer Sim wrote:I'm John Mather photographer seeing as Ive been brought into this topic(hope you like the ironic username)Ive registered.The member who has posted my Twitter account and email denied being part of any David Icke style fringe group to me onTwitter yet here he is.
His promised "interrogation" never materialised so maybe some here would like to step up in his place?
Also the bizarre(normal for this forum it seems) claims of photo manipulation are untrue. I worked on this news story and have similair pictures to ones published here.
This maybe my only post ,I only registered to address stupid claims happy to answer any conspiracy theories.
Re: Deleted pictures and Jon Kelly (again)
Euphoria wrote:That's what I thought at the time. But it seems, everybody else experienced it too.agraposo wrote:Maybe it is a bug in the navigator (I use Firefox). When I don´t see the images, I press "quote" and then "preview", and the images appear!
Euphoria, you have been editing your posts constantly.
Time after time you have edited and deleted posts and photo's, do you really think anyone would be thick enough to take the bollocks you are talking. suggesting its a 'bug navigator'
Re: Deleted pictures and Jon Kelly (again)
I am a quick writer, sporadic. I constantly go back and re-edit. It's my style. Lots of people on here do it.Alfie wrote:Euphoria, you have been editing your posts constantly.
Look, Photographer Sim is here. Let's see what he has to say.
P.S. I'm fairly certain Simon Shack is happy with my contributions so far. If he decides I'm a disruptor and tells me to bog off, then I will. I didn't really expect mindless mob behaviour in here, of all places. Anyway, John Mather - your response is keenly awaited!
Last edited by Euphoria on Sat Sep 22, 2012 10:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Dale Cregan 09/18/2011
You might need this;
-
- Member
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:00 pm
Re: Dale Cregan 09/18/2011
You wnat to see my pictures there are many on my website or Daily mail site has some of Cregan shooting I think,why would I post them here with exif data? If you want to think they are not real thats your mental problem not mine. Ah 9/11 and 7/7 were hoaxes? So all those people that died didnt die? Phew Im sure their relatives wil be happy to hear that.brianv wrote:What is a "david icke fringe group"? Is that something like the bbc? We'd be delighted to look over your pictures which you may post here including their Exif data, and they will be duly examined. Another thing, we don't do conspiracies here [we leave that for the mainstream clowns] only hoaxes like "9/11" and "7/7" and a raft of others.Photographer Sim wrote:I'm John Mather photographer seeing as Ive been brought into this topic(hope you like the ironic username)Ive registered.The member who has posted my Twitter account and email denied being part of any David Icke style fringe group to me onTwitter yet here he is.
His promised "interrogation" never materialised so maybe some here would like to step up in his place?
Also the bizarre(normal for this forum it seems) claims of photo manipulation are untrue. I worked on this news story and have similair pictures to ones published here.
This maybe my only post ,I only registered to address stupid claims happy to answer any conspiracy theories.
Anyway Im not getting into that debate I dont indulge fantasies. As I said I dont indulge fantasies I dont need to prove my pictures are real as Imnotmaking a claim that they are fake! A psoter has stated they and others are fake so if you have some proof Im all ears.
Re: Dale Cregan 09/18/2011
Photographer Sim wrote:You wnat to see my pictures there are many on my website or Daily mail site has some
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... 9766650001
You mean the above image, originally taken from this link at The Daily Mail?
But it seems that over the last several hours, it has been taken off that web page! I wonder why?
Above: You can still view the picture on Google Images. But it has been removed from the page. Click, and you are taken to the headline...