OSLO and UTØYA, 7/22 2011

Unread post by **hollycrap** » Sat Apr 21, 2012 9:36 pm

This is the work of a pesky poltergeist in the court

Unread post by **Makkonen** » Sat Apr 21, 2012 10:06 pm

[Essex Police], [Harry Fear], aaand...*drum-roll*...[David Icke Books ltd] !!!

Wow, what a weird trio of claimants. I really don't understand how any of them could have any "copyright" to that video whatsoever.

Seems more of a move by the "damage control" network of the PsyOp organization. The bastards are forcing removal of videos, threatening with copyright claims and/or even lawyers. F*****s.

Unread post by **Alfie** » Sun Apr 22, 2012 10:22 am

bostonterrierowner wrote: GEMATRIA

lol what a muppet am I

Sun Apr 22, 2012 11:06 am

Alfie wrote:
bostonterrierowner wrote: GEMATRIA
lol what a muppet am I

Alfie, I'm finding it increasingly difficult to believe that you are a "middle-aged man with a dog from the Midlands."

Unread post by **Kentrailer** » Mon Apr 23, 2012 1:21 am

Looks like most of the flashes are exactly the same in the ITN footage.

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j8oM-pxN-ao

Unread post by **wtc-wtf** » Mon Apr 23, 2012 1:47 am

Excellent video kentrailer. I really enjoyed this easy to understand and really proves a point.

Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:21 am

^agree 100% superb analysis. I also wonder if 'flash' images taken through the incomplete glass screen should look the same as those unimpeded ones taken to the side? Also, would the glass screen not present a flash-back anti-photographic effect to those taking shots from that angle? Note also the contemporary psychology in the whole overall composition of this image...all pictures "have to be taken from behind", Brevick is separated from the victim parents and witnesses, but intimately viewable by you, the gullible and entrusted viewer/consumer. That essential imagery validation element, images of people filming and photographing 'images' puts you in the suggestible state of undeniable acceptance of the core veracity of the synthetic focus of attention.

Great work Kentrailer. What do we make of the canary-yellow simulant in centre screen, with sunglasses upon a yellow beanie-hat? I noted the immovable spectator comments earlier, and Simon's poltergeist chair-back... this court case, for both prosecution and defence, is looking like it could fall apart quite soon...a pity that there's no true higher court within which this whole charade can be taken to trial

Unread post by **wtc-wtf** » Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:40 am

Here is another example of these flashes.

They seem to follow this Jesse J character around.

Unread post by **Kentrailer** » Mon Apr 23, 2012 6:00 am

wtc-wtf wrote:Here is another example of these flashes.

.....

That seems to happen in some videos which should be legit. But flashes never look exactly the same.

An example of that "flicker effect" showing up "naturally" in a video:

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ia3YIpib1M8
Advance to about 1:00 in the video.

Unread post by **Kentrailer** » Mon Apr 23, 2012 6:05 am

MrMezrabotan posted this video:

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FE1m2WeVvqE

Real, or fake?
----------

icarusinbound wrote:^agree 100% superb analysis. I also wonder if 'flash' images taken through the incomplete glass screen should look the same as those unimpeded ones taken to the side? Also, would the glass screen not present a flash-back anti-photographic effect to those taking shots from that angle? Note also the contemporary psychology in the whole overall composition of this image...all pictures "have to be taken from behind", Brevick is separated from the victim parents and witnesses, but intimately viewable by you, the gullible and entrusted viewer/consumer. That essential imagery validation element, images of people filming and photographing 'images' puts you in the suggestible state of undeniable acceptance of the core veracity of the synthetic focus of attention.

Great work Kentrailer. What do we make of the canary-yellow simulant in centre screen, with sunglasses upon a yellow beanie-hat? I noted the immovable spectator comments earlier, and Simon's poltergeist chair-back... this court case, for both prosecution and defence, is looking like it could fall apart quite soon...a pity that there's no true higher court within which this whole charade can be taken to trial

Exactly- the flashes "behind the glass" should look completely different. Every single flash looks like "the master flash".

Upon closer inspection.. Even the supposed reflections from "flashes" just out of view are using the same thing as well (just really tiny and doubled). Lazy, lazy lazy.

Try to re-upload any of these videos though.. not much love on the search index, especially "recently uploaded" where it usually takes several days to be indexed mysteriously (if at all).

Unread post by **wtc-wtf** » Mon Apr 23, 2012 12:22 pm

Re: OSLO and UTØYA, 7/22 2011
by Kentrailer on April 23rd, 2012, 7:00 am

That seems to happen in some videos which should be legit. But flashes never look exactly the same.

An example of that "flicker effect" showing up "naturally" in a video:

I'm not sure the "flicker effect" does occur naturally, I think at the very least its some sort of visual manipulation.I am leaning towards the idea that the characters may be CGI. Does anyone know if these people exist anywhere other than a stage managed environment?, I'm unsure but I am certainly gonna try to find out.

Mon Apr 23, 2012 2:09 pm

strange places in oslo

might be a bit off topic but my research brougth me to that strange park in oslo:

Vigeland Sculpture Park

http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=59.92644 ... 8572&hl=de

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4jaUe4TCzU

its seems like there is a lot of occult stuff going on in oslo:

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KvHNKRxAZGM

kentrailer maybe the girl who made these videos can help you with the Storgata 27 and youngs gate topic

Unread post by **simonshack** » Mon Apr 23, 2012 2:14 pm

Dear wtc-wtf,

Here's a listing of the "aktØrene" (as they get called in Norwegian).

http://nrk.no/227/fakta/rettsaktorene/

It should be fairly easy for anyone in Oslo to find/meet these people. I lean towards them being real, flesh and blood human beings. But you never know...

I had to laugh once again when reading Breivik's main lawyer's (Geir Lippestad) ...uhm..."credentials". Or I should say "credential" - since it is all summed up in one single phrase! (in above-linked page)

"Geir Lippestad har tidligere forsvart Ole Nicolai Kvisler, som ble dømt til 17 års fengsel for drapet på Benjamin Hermansen i 2002."

"Geir Lippestad has earlier defended Ole Nicolai Kvisler, who was given a 17-year prison sentence for the murder of Benjamin Hermansen in 2002".

So not only are we told that Breivik chose a lawyer who's a member of the Arbeiderpartiet (the very political party he hated so much as to kill 69 kid members of the same) - but he chose a lawyer whose 'claim to fame' is to have had a client slammed to rot in jail for 17 years (not far from the Norwegian maximum sentence of 21 years)... So I decided to have a closer look at this affair - which turns out to be another hodgepodge of raving weirdness...

As the story goes, two "neo-nazi" guys allegedly killed on January 26, 2001 (in what was called "Norway's first racist murder") this 15-year-old, Norwegian/Ghanaian lad - Benjamin Hermansen:

"Benjamin Hermansen - killed at age 15"
http://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/arti ... id=5200561
(Question: does that guy look like a 15-year-old kid?)

Here's Geir Lippestad's former client - Ole Nicolai Kvisler (at right):

photo credited to... yes, you guessed it: HEIKO JUNGE !

http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/new ... oto/852870

(And here's his accomplice, Joe Erling Jahr - also jailed for 17/18 odd years...)

***************************************

Now, on Benjamin's Wickedpedia page we learn that:

Pop singer Michael Jackson dedicated his 2001 album Invincible to Benjamin Hermansen (and also to his own parents and grandmother). The reason for this has partly to do with the fact that the Holmlia boy Omer Bhatti and Jackson were close friends, and Bhatti was at the same time a good friend of Benjamin Hermansen. On the album cover, next to the image of a rose, it reads:

Michael Jackson gives "special thanks": «This album is dedicated to Benjamin ‘Benny’ Hermansen. May we continue to remember not to judge man by the color of his skin, but the content of his Character. Benjamin … we love you … may you rest in peace.»
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_ ... _Hermansen

So what's with this Omer Bhatti, you may ask? Well - he's suspected to be Michael Jackson's secret son!

http://fooyoh.com/menknowpause_lifestyle_living/3653872

Small world, ain't it?

In any case, it looks like Geir Lippestad is no stranger to strange Norwegian murder cases... The Kvisler affair may well have been a 'general rehearsal' for the Big Breivik Show. The sordid media saga around Geir's former, convicted "neo-nazi" client (Ole Nicolai Kvisler) also involves the tale of some old woman who assigned Kvisler (in her will) the sum of 250.000 NOK - reportedly "in support of his tough anti-immigration views"...

In 2002, the Norwegian ethno-nationalist Ole Nicolai Kvisler was found guilty of the murder of the "Afro-Norwegian" teenager Benjamin Hermansen. The murder triggered off a tsunami of intense, anti-racist hysteria among the Norwegian establishment, including the Royal family (protest marches, torchlight processions, media penitential exercises, soul-searching, moral panic attacks and national self-scrutiny).

The former resistance fighter and Supreme Court advocate Erik Gjems-Onstad - one of four executors of a will, responsible for dividing up an inheritance of the late Clara Weltzin (Oslo) - has now decided to donate 250.000 NOK (approx. USD 50.000) to Kvisler, 50.000 NOK to the Norwegian national socialist Odinist Tore Tvedt, and 500.000 NOK to the Norwegian anti-immigrationist party NorgesPatriotene.

Clara Weltzin had no lawful heirs, and made Norwegian anti-immigrationists beneficiaries of the will, approx. 2.7 million NOK (ca. USD 550.000).
http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/iriks ... 5VsA9kmySo

Unread post by **Kentrailer** » Mon Apr 23, 2012 6:35 pm

simonshack wrote: I had to laugh once again when reading Breivik's main lawyer's (Geir Lippestad) ...uhm..."credentials". Or I should say "credential" - since it is all summed up in one single phrase! (in above-linked page)

The interview with Lippestad is hilarious (and it's edited into short clips) but what he says is really classic...

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LMsfw0eFzY

Among the gems in there- Lippestad is asked if he thinks he'll be able to find 12 jurors for the trial, as everyone has been influenced in Norway and has heard about the case.

Lippestad responds in the affirmative- he will be able to find 12 jurors. Only problem with his response is in Norway a criminal trial consists of 10 jurors!

The lawyer doesn't even know how many people there are on a jury! He basically appeared out of nowhere, and as was pointed out above- Has lost his only other supposed previous case! Breivik supposedly hand selects this guy?

He hates the Arbeiterpartei so much that he chooses them to represent him? Come on!

In the "scamifesto" "Breivik" specifically talks about selecting a nationalistic (patriot) lawyer who will do a good job defending you:

So, Breivik then goes and choose this loser of a lawyer who has no winning experience and isn't even of his same "nationalistic" belief system? A lawyer so out of it, he doesn't know how many jurors are used in a criminal trial in Norway?
------------

Oh and it appears a solution to the "flash issue" has been devised- Just make the sound of lots of cameras taking pictures, but don't show any flashes (nobody will ask any questions..):

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6QI7zBB7M8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6QI7zBB7M8
Pay attention to :25 and on- The sound of many camera flashes, then they pan out, and nobody is taking pictures, and there are no flashes, just the sound of it!

Unread post by **simonshack** » Mon Apr 23, 2012 8:13 pm

+

Courtroom image 1:

Courtroom image 2:

Strange, huh? Must be just some parallax/focal distortion illusion...

****************************

And what are the first pair of psychologists DOING THERE? The two brainless clowns who were promptly dismissed for "establishing that Breivik was mad in his head" - and thus unaccountable for his actions?

Woops! Gosh! They're brainless indeed (Oh well... must just be due to "random video compression issues"...)

Torgeir Husby and Synne Sørheim

http://www.abcnyheter.no/nyheter/2011/1 ... -rapporten