*
ABOUT THE PROGRESSIVE RELEASE OF WTC COLLAPSE IMAGERY :
the "NIST-FOIA Cumulus" batch (or "The Nine Eleven 2010 Movie Sequel")
I consider the point I am about to make
extremely important - for the historical record of the 9/11 TV FAKERY research. As someone who has closely monitored, compiled and researched the 9/11 imagery for about half a decade, I wish to make it very clear that the bulk of higher-resolution imagery we have today was certainly NOT available to the public as I started my September Clues research - around 2006. The sharper imagery we have today has been trickling out year after year - as if their authors (photographers and videographers) had jealously kept them in their drawers for many years. This, of course, doesn't make any sense.
For instance, I clearly remember (back in 2006/2007) having great problems finding images/footage of the WTC1 collapse. (Today, of course, you will find tons of WTC1 collapse imagery, with a few search clicks - and faster than you can say
"WTC1 collapse imagery"). Now, those who weren't investigating 9/11 at the time will only have to take my word for it; this is certainly unfortunate, but please think about it: how could I possibly have documented such a fact at the time? Even if I had been smart enough to anticipate that we would eventually be flooded with new, fresh, high-res 9/11 imagery, how could I have recorded any proof of the scarcity of such crucial 9/11 imagery back then?
Today, however, I was fortunate enough to bump into this old (April 4, 2007) web page. Its (sadly anonymous) author makes some rather good points about the seismic data and so forth. At one stage, this 9/11 researcher states this particularly interesting thing:
Disconcerting indeed! Here's a 9/11 researcher who, in 2007, wasn't able to find ANY imagery of the WTC1 collapse! (At the time, I had myself been able to find only a mere handful of dreadfully blurry, low-resolution video clips - all credited to Steven Rosenbaum's sinister "Camera Planet" collection...)
This sadly anonymous researcher (who focuses on the seismic data and its curious discrepancies with the officially released 9/11 data by NIST) then goes on to formulate a most logical-sounding conclusion, this time on the subject of the WTC7 collapse:
Some who have studied internet videos conclude that WTC7 fell in almost free-fall time. This is odd, considering the seismic results. Such a disparity raises the possibility of tampering with either the seismic or the video evidence.
NIST: At the forefront of the 9/11 IMAGERY COVERUP!
Now, I trust everyone is fully aware of the central role played by NIST (the National Institute of Standards and Technology) in covering up the 9/11 scam. Clearly, NIST's ridiculous/outlandish 'scientific conclusions' as to the physics of the collapses of the WTC towers (the two of which purportedly came down in "9 seconds" and "11 seconds" respectively!) are just a propagandistic diversion aimed at focusing people's outrage/attention on the collapse physics (AS SEEN ON TV). In this way, NIST feeds their phony opponents (such as A&E for 9/11 Truth) with fodder for constant, circular controversy - aiming to uphold an endless dog-and-pony show for another 50 years. Of course, there is no more WTC rubble to analyze: it was all quickly removed. Any "explosive evidence" anyone might come up with(Nano-Thermite/Nukes/DEW and whatnot) is bound to remain dust in the wind. What evidence remains? What demonstrable, verifiable and repeatable proof are we left with - to expose 9/11 for being the hoax that it was? As far as I can tell, all we have left is the demonstrable, verifiable and repeatable evidence of image fakery.
Naturally, there follows that NIST is also in charge of covering up the 9/11 image fakery; in fact, this is probably today
on the very top of their agenda.
To be sure, in 2010 we (the public) were treated to a FOIA act
(allegedly filed by ABC news!!!
) which reportedly forced NIST to release a vast amount (4.7gigabytes) of new, fresh, NEVER-SEEN-BEFORE high-resolution imagery
(the "NIST-FOIA Cumulus" batch). In this Daily Mail article dated February 11, 2010, we were informed that
NIST actually
"collected images from amateur, professional and freelance photographers as part of its investigation into the collapse of the World Trade Centre" :
An example of recently released (2010) "NEVER-SEEN-BEFORE
(entirely phony) 9/11 footage:
Uploaded on Youtube by "STEVE VIGILANTE": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwKQXsXJDX4
Video description:
"Some footage I shot on 9-11-01. This is never before seen footage and has never been released. I chose to upload it because I feel it has historical importance. Like many New Yorkers I know some of the people who have passed and I know many people who have lost a loved one. Some of the footage is considered graphic as is some of the language. Unfortunately, this is a day I will never forget. May God Bless those who we lost on that terrible day."
What a big, fat joke this all is.