hoi.polloi » April 11th, 2018, 2:25 pm wrote:Look, is there some way you can contribute to the discussion besides just posting video links? You need to describe what's fake and/or suspicious using your own words or what is the point?
Alright, I hear ya. I meant to say that out of my research (skimming through 250 videos) these were the two best [and the reasons why].
fbenario » April 11th, 2018, 6:56 pm wrote:Suspended Belief » April 11th, 2018, 6:28 pm wrote:I just spent a few hours downloading and watching more Nasim CGI videos. There are 500 total according to my research, and I have found about 250. I was posting the best ones that expose the fakery, but if you don't want to see the results of my research then that is fine.
Hoi didn't say he didn't want to see your research, he asked you to analyze the research you post and tell us why you're posting it.
Alright, don't hate me! Enough people hate me for what reasons I do not know!
fbenario » April 11th, 2018, 6:56 pm wrote:Suspended Belief » April 11th, 2018, 6:28 pm wrote:I just spent a few hours downloading and watching more Nasim CGI videos. There are 500 total according to my research, and I have found about 250. I was posting the best ones that expose the fakery, but if you don't want to see the results of my research then that is fine.
It is not a good look for you to purposely misinterpret/misread his request, especially not in a way that makes you sound defensive, like a spoiled child looking for praise. If you were here in good faith you would not so blithely dismiss a moderator request.
Well, I hate cocky and prideful people, and spoiled children (I consider myself far from spoiled, at least in a materialistic context), so thx for the post. I will try to not act prideful in the future. I'm sure if I do, you will be the first to let me know.