THE "CHATBOX"

[simonshack]

I know, Utah, I know - perhaps I should have added a disclaimer at the end of my 'praise' of Rappoport's article there...

Would anyone take the time to contact Jon and ask him if he's familiar with our forum? I find it a bit awkward to do so myself, if you see what I mean.

[Utah]

^I was pretty sure the praise of Rappoport was sarcastic.

Just for kicks, I'll send him email asking his 'professional opinion' of the fakery research here at cluesforum...

[brianv]

^I was pretty sure the praise of Rappoport was sarcastic.

Just for kicks, I'll send him email asking his 'professional opinion' of the fakery research here at cluesforum...

"What? Those Holocaust deniers"? Something along those lines. But of course he's reading this, then again, aren't they all?

[anonjedi2]

Hi anonjedi2!
I was reading the recent thread on CluesForum about shareholders cross-participation in big companies and how the money, somehow, actually "goes in circles" while giving the impression to outsiders that the money is circulating. Maybe these funds, like ([st]"God found me"[/st] ) "GoFundMe" are based on the same principle as "money going in circles": could it be that despite the apparent crowd on their web site there are not so many genuine people (=not part of the scheme and/or not "sims") who are falling for these Boston charity scams and giving away their money? Could this be more about reinforcing the idea that the "terror attack" was "real" and about giving another boost to the vocabulary (such as the word "hero" that can be found on so many "donors" comments on the Boston fund pages) used by the MSM than about collecting "real" money?

I personally think it's real money, collected from the millions of Americans who are stuck in their slumber. Part of the point of all of this is to make lots of money and fast. It's an easy way to pay off the actors. But then again, how could any of us ever know for sure?

[MrSinclair]

There is a lot of corporate money going into black holes like the BostonOneFund but I am sure that plenty of money comes from individuals. I don't doubt that throughout the cubicle farms underpaid drones are getting hit up for donations and most willingly give just wanting to be good citizens and get along.
Having lived with a "question authority" mindset since the 1960's I am dismayed and disgusted by the lack of such suspicion and distrust among today's youth. Has it really come to cheering the fucking stormtroopers taking to the streets while living in fear of pot smoking teenage patsies? I miss John Wayne, Richard Nixon and Timothy Leary...

[lux]

What is "real money"?

[Maat]

This site, http://www.moillusions.com/, has some good examples of those old optical illusion images that the hoaxers seem to be getting a kick out of hinting at in their sim fauxtos lately. e.g. http://www.moillusions.com/2013/04/bliv ... ecton.html






@ http://www.moillusions.com/2011/09/impo ... again.html

[agraposo]

What about this one?

http://francistabary.com/index.php?menu ... mpossibles

[agraposo]

I couldn't find when this image was discussed before. The smoke emerging from the south tower and between both towers, is behind and in front of the north tower at the same time!


http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641 ... 14,00.html

[HonestlyNow]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2yhGVaVwceE

Along Came Polly, 2004. Character Polly Prince writes a children's short story with a moral (don't play with fireworks), titled "The Boy with a Nub for an Arm," with this drawing as illustration. Notice the boy wears a shirt with a blue stripe.

[TrutherInTX]

There is supposed to be a meteor shower tonight, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/0 ... 19003.html. I've been outside looking but nothing yet. I'm in Dallas, TX and we do have lots of lights but it is a clear, cool night. There is supposed to be a NASA chat but I have not been able to get in yet, http://www.nasa.gov/connect/chat/aquarids_2013.html.

I also signed up for the ISS viewing notifications but every one I have gotten so far has been a cloudy day. Anxious to see if I can ever spot it.

[analucia]

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOqZuRfaCJA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOqZuRfa ... e=youtu.be

[Maat]

Analucia,

Why did you post that video without comment or clarification? It's just another doom & gloom disinfo clown promoting the bombs & vicsims as real but "staged/allowed to happen/false flag"

[analucia]

My apologies, I wanted to get thoughts about what he was talking about. I should have specified to ignore the Storm Clouds stuff, but rather focus on Eric guy's analyses starting at 6:35 and more specifically around 8:00. He's talking about something beyond the illusion they create of false flags and whatever exactly you would call the Boston fakery. He's speaking about government shills in alternative media putting information out to "awakened" people because it is a tactic of the government to spread disinformation with the sole purpose of psychological warfare, to create a further divide between people who are questioning things and the sheeple who follow mainstream media blindly and believe all the attacks are real at face value. This divide is all a part of their plan - if we are busy fighting each other over what's real and what's not, they continue to follow their agenda and continue to create more hurdles for everyone using illusion and the science of psychology. He talks, although it's merely a mention, about computer generated people that the government creates and operatives that create fake profiles on social media, all parts of their fakery.

I think he's got some valid points in here. The entire video doesn't represent what I believe, but I get what he's saying. That's why I put it here in The Chatbox, as I think it deserves some attention.

Other than this forum, I've never seen or heard anyone educating folks on the possibility of these events being completely faked like you all talk about. People aren't educated about that, in my opinion. I have began wrapping my head around it and I get it, I can see it, but I think this group is a small sect in the entire group of folks who are questioning things. I'd say this is a rather exclusive group too, which in some respects I totally understand as well, but there are larger groups of people searching for answers and either they haven't discovered this forum and the extensive research you all have done or they come here and if anyone expresses a difference in opinion, it essentially becomes a situation where the admins and mods of this board go on the attack and either conclude the poster is stupid, a shill, a troll, etc., rather than the possibility that the poster is truly someone looking for answers, although they haven't studied all the threads on this board to speak on your level. I get it when you guys go on the offensive, as I see examples of shills all the time on the internet, and posters who probably do work for the government and their main goal is to misdirect and derail threads that are actually getting some traction near the truth.

But I also believe there is another side to this, the thing he talks about, that they want people to divide over these "attacks". The more people they can get to ultimately stand down, whether it's because they are sheeple, as apparently the whole of Boston is as they actually cheered about the test run of martial law that happened there, or because it's the people who are questioning things get to a point that they start trying to educate themselves and then in that process read about FEMA camps and all this other nonsense, that's misinformation the government is putting out there to hopefully scare folks into consent of what's happening because of the fear of retribution for being a truth seeker.

There is an agenda behind all this fakery, I believe that to be a fact. I think he makes a valid point, a government can only control by the consent of the governed. They want people to divide - divide and conquer - and psychological warfare is a part of the plan. Everything they do is deliberate. Everything that's put out there to analyze is put out there on purpose, mistakes and all, and some of the mistakes are on purpose to create dissent among the skeptics, to further divide.

I was just hoping to get your viewpoints about this line of thought. Ok, we see the fakery, what now? Are we just waiting for the next fake event so we can dissect it, prove it's fake and then go about my day? I have children, and although Simon has pointed out, I should be happy to learn innocent people aren't being butchered at public events by active terrorists, because these are fake distractions. Great. Why? What is the government trying to do? Are they going to try and separate me from my children if I don't go along with a socialist agenda? I think there's actually a war being waged inside the government, all in a struggle for power - but one way beyond Democrats and Republicans and some people who appear on the face to be working opposite sides are actually on the same team. How do we get more people to wake up and see what's happening? How do we connect with the good people in government that at their core don't really agree with all this stuff and are having trouble sleeping at night because of their involvement with the fakery? How do we get them back on our side? Hitler rose to power with huge consent by the people. I used to think it was ludicrous to compare Obama to Hitler, but I'm starting to really understand the phrase "those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."

And if you've answered these questions on this forum, I'll find them and I apologize for being redundant in advance.

[brianv]

[quote="analucia"][/quote]

What a long winded reply! Why is that video more important than this site? It's a video it must be the truth! Such nonsense.

Instead of posting links to shit videos that take people AWAY from this site and becoming totally distracted by the youtube bullshit - how about telling the "person" who made the video, to come here if they're so clued up!