Roswell school shooting... hmmm...
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi- ... 9541.story
THE "CHATBOX"
-
- Member
- Posts: 5060
- Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:24 pm
Re: THE "CHATBOX"
Really odd that they feel the need to remind us of UFO stories, I'd guess this is an attempt to force the collision of "UFO conspiracy" folks and "false flag" folks and see if in the ensuing mash up they can ruffle feathers and divide researchers into government-media collusion, prevent the twain from meeting. If it is, we shouldn't bite, and we should just say, "Welp! Too bad we don't discuss UFO stuff here. So let's drop that aspect right away, if you please."
Like we usually do. And it's probably best to remind everyone the reasons we don't go there is not because there is absolutely nothing to debunk or discuss, but because it is far too distracting from what we can show is 100% known and proven fakery regarding specific politically motivated fake incidents, false flags and manufactured events.
So if it is not our focus, hopefully those with any opinion on the matter can just keep that to their UFO message boards; it serves as far too messy a topic for our forum. Is that a fair way of responding to this media provocation?
As for this:
Huh? Must have missed that one. Did we have a topic started on this one?
So all at once 12 year olds are bringing and firing guns in synchronized pairs? Clearly this is a conspiracy organized by evil tweens. Now we'll have twin articles about 11-year olds with guns. Then a toddler will find daddy's gun and blow its own brains out. Then a mother will shoot her unborn child. Then grandpa will rape someone using a gun. They will stoop forever lower in trying to achieve their gun laws. It's just getting beyond ridiculous, and off into the absurd how they focus so intently on one mission and let everyone know it. Why so anti-gun right now? Thank goodness they overstepped a bit with these because it seems people are waking up to how far the government/media will go to try to force a narrative.
Like we usually do. And it's probably best to remind everyone the reasons we don't go there is not because there is absolutely nothing to debunk or discuss, but because it is far too distracting from what we can show is 100% known and proven fakery regarding specific politically motivated fake incidents, false flags and manufactured events.
So if it is not our focus, hopefully those with any opinion on the matter can just keep that to their UFO message boards; it serves as far too messy a topic for our forum. Is that a fair way of responding to this media provocation?
As for this:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi- ... 9541.storyThe shooting was the second to take place at a U.S. middle school in three months, after a 12-year-old boy opened fire at his middle school in Sparks, Nevada, in October, killing a teacher and wounding two students before killing himself.
Huh? Must have missed that one. Did we have a topic started on this one?
So all at once 12 year olds are bringing and firing guns in synchronized pairs? Clearly this is a conspiracy organized by evil tweens. Now we'll have twin articles about 11-year olds with guns. Then a toddler will find daddy's gun and blow its own brains out. Then a mother will shoot her unborn child. Then grandpa will rape someone using a gun. They will stoop forever lower in trying to achieve their gun laws. It's just getting beyond ridiculous, and off into the absurd how they focus so intently on one mission and let everyone know it. Why so anti-gun right now? Thank goodness they overstepped a bit with these because it seems people are waking up to how far the government/media will go to try to force a narrative.
Re: THE "CHATBOX"
Clearly the only way to stop all these school shootings is to ban schools.
-
- Member
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 3:15 pm
Re: THE "CHATBOX"
Well, mass shootings worked in Australia. After the Port Arthur massacre everyone DownUnder handed in their weapons:
http://www.truthology.org.au/index.php/ ... false-flag
http://www.truthology.org.au/index.php/ ... false-flag
Re: THE "CHATBOX"
That's mass shooting simulations, Rudy.Rudy Algera wrote:Well, mass shootings worked in Australia. After the Port Arthur massacre everyone DownUnder handed in their weapons:
http://www.truthology.org.au/index.php/ ... false-flag
-
- Member
- Posts: 5060
- Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:24 pm
Re: THE "CHATBOX"
Victims of Port Arthur according to Wicketpeddler. Save the first (apparently a more famous) victim, everyone has a middle name! That's interesting.
Winifred Joyce Aplin, 58
Walter John Bennett, 66
Nicole Louise Burgess, 17
Sou Leng Chung, 32
Elva Rhonda Gaylard, 48
Zoe Anne Hall, 28
Elizabeth Jayne Howard, 26
Mary Elizabeth Howard, 57
Mervyn John Howard, 55
Ronald Noel Jary, 71
Tony Vadivelu Kistan, 51
Leslie Dennis Lever, 53
Sarah Kate Loughton, 15
David Martin, 72
Noelene Joyce Martin, 69
Pauline Virjeana Masters, 49
Alannah Louise Mikac, 6
Madeline Grace Mikac, 3
Nanette Patricia Mikac, 36
Andrew Bruce Mills, 49
Peter Brenton Nash, 32
Gwenda Joan Neander, 67
Moh Yee Willing Ng, 48
Anthony Nightingale, 44
Mary Rose Nixon, 60
Glen Roy Pears, 35
Russell James Pollard, 72
Janette Kathleen Quin, 50
Helene Maria Salzmann, 50
Robert Graham Salzmann, 57
Kate Elizabeth Scott, 21
Kevin Vincent Sharp, 68
Raymond John Sharp, 67
Royce William Thompson, 59
Jason Bernard Winter, 29
I find this group interesting:
Elizabeth Jayne Howard
Mary Elizabeth Howard
Mervyn John Howard
I know families tend to do that — comment on each other's names and all — and it's plausible enough, but interesting nonetheless. Four names for three people: Elizabeth, Mery/Mary(ish), Jane/John(ish) and Howard. Weren't there queens Mary and Elizabeth and don't Australians generally follow some kind of distant inbred royal family somewhere with those names? As for 'John Howard' meshed in, that can only be an unlikely coincidence. Predictive programming is a scientific impossibility, as media-believers keep telling us.
Why was President Bill Clinton in Australia at the time? So many oddities. Rudy Algera, the site you linked to seems to be a good start, but by now, don't you think it needs some beefing up with awareness of what simulation is capable of doing with the human psyche? Is it particularly hard to find photos of these victims?
This seems to be in the vein of the 1993 World Trade Center event where pictures were more scarce. Perhaps if this event was totally fake, they were not so confident with their sims yet?
Winifred Joyce Aplin, 58
Walter John Bennett, 66
Nicole Louise Burgess, 17
Sou Leng Chung, 32
Elva Rhonda Gaylard, 48
Zoe Anne Hall, 28
Elizabeth Jayne Howard, 26
Mary Elizabeth Howard, 57
Mervyn John Howard, 55
Ronald Noel Jary, 71
Tony Vadivelu Kistan, 51
Leslie Dennis Lever, 53
Sarah Kate Loughton, 15
David Martin, 72
Noelene Joyce Martin, 69
Pauline Virjeana Masters, 49
Alannah Louise Mikac, 6
Madeline Grace Mikac, 3
Nanette Patricia Mikac, 36
Andrew Bruce Mills, 49
Peter Brenton Nash, 32
Gwenda Joan Neander, 67
Moh Yee Willing Ng, 48
Anthony Nightingale, 44
Mary Rose Nixon, 60
Glen Roy Pears, 35
Russell James Pollard, 72
Janette Kathleen Quin, 50
Helene Maria Salzmann, 50
Robert Graham Salzmann, 57
Kate Elizabeth Scott, 21
Kevin Vincent Sharp, 68
Raymond John Sharp, 67
Royce William Thompson, 59
Jason Bernard Winter, 29
I find this group interesting:
Elizabeth Jayne Howard
Mary Elizabeth Howard
Mervyn John Howard
I know families tend to do that — comment on each other's names and all — and it's plausible enough, but interesting nonetheless. Four names for three people: Elizabeth, Mery/Mary(ish), Jane/John(ish) and Howard. Weren't there queens Mary and Elizabeth and don't Australians generally follow some kind of distant inbred royal family somewhere with those names? As for 'John Howard' meshed in, that can only be an unlikely coincidence. Predictive programming is a scientific impossibility, as media-believers keep telling us.
Why was President Bill Clinton in Australia at the time? So many oddities. Rudy Algera, the site you linked to seems to be a good start, but by now, don't you think it needs some beefing up with awareness of what simulation is capable of doing with the human psyche? Is it particularly hard to find photos of these victims?
This seems to be in the vein of the 1993 World Trade Center event where pictures were more scarce. Perhaps if this event was totally fake, they were not so confident with their sims yet?
Re: THE "CHATBOX"
'New' 9/11 footage in 'HD.'
I can't watch this at the moment because of a slow connection.
http://www.blacklistednews.com/VIDEO%3A ... 0/Y/M.html
I can't watch this at the moment because of a slow connection.
http://www.blacklistednews.com/VIDEO%3A ... 0/Y/M.html
-
- Member
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 3:15 pm
Re: THE "CHATBOX"
You are right, hoi.polloi and brianv, the one question that never seems to be asked is: are the victims real? Was anyone actually killed in Port Arthur or are we just given a list of names of so-called dead people. Similarly in the Oslo/Utoya event, the London bus- and underground bombing, Sandy Hook shooting, Twin Towers NY attack, etc.
The questions: are the deaths real? did those people actually exist or were they made-up names? does not seem to occur to this investigator, Andrew MacGregor:
http://www.hiddenmysteries.org/conspira ... thur1.html
The questions: are the deaths real? did those people actually exist or were they made-up names? does not seem to occur to this investigator, Andrew MacGregor:
http://www.hiddenmysteries.org/conspira ... thur1.html
-
- Member
- Posts: 853
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 10:01 pm
Re: THE "CHATBOX"
Regarding UFO
Iranians expose Obama - he is the secret regime's head allied with Aliens :
http://www.tvn24.pl/iranczycy-demaskuja ... 013,s.html
Iranians expose Obama - he is the secret regime's head allied with Aliens :
http://www.tvn24.pl/iranczycy-demaskuja ... 013,s.html
Re: THE "CHATBOX"
Why don't you contact him Rudy? Though you should expect a bunch of expletives in the reply - that's how conspiracy numpties operate.Rudy Algera wrote:You are right, hoi.polloi and brianv, the one question that never seems to be asked is: are the victims real? Was anyone actually killed in Port Arthur or are we just given a list of names of so-called dead people. Similarly in the Oslo/Utoya event, the London bus- and underground bombing, Sandy Hook shooting, Twin Towers NY attack, etc.
The questions: are the deaths real? did those people actually exist or were they made-up names? does not seem to occur to this investigator, Andrew MacGregor:
http://www.hiddenmysteries.org/conspira ... thur1.html
-
- Member
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 3:15 pm
Re: THE "CHATBOX"
Perhaps we should call these non-existent people who supposedly died in the above mentioned psy-ops DEAD SOULS, inspired by Gogol's novel of that name, and offer to buy them, as did the main character Chichikov in the story.
from Wikipedia:
9/11 --- approx "3000" dead souls
Oslo/Utoya --- 77 dead souls
London 7/7bombing --- 52 dead souls(+4 soulless suicidal muslim terrorists...)
Port Arthur massacre --- 35 dead souls
Queen's Day Apeldoorn Holland --- ???
(any more?)
********
(Admin edit): Sorry Rudy, but I just HAD to correct your official death-toll figures ... however bogus they all are!... - simon
from Wikipedia:
Chichikov got only 400 dead souls or vicsims. We can do better than that."Chichikov's macabre mission to acquire "dead souls" is actually just another complicated scheme to inflate his social standing (essentially a 19th-century Russian version of the ever-popular "get rich quick" scheme). He hopes to collect the legal ownership rights to dead serfs as a way of inflating his apparent wealth and power. Once he acquires enough dead souls, take out an enormous loan against them, finally acquiring the great wealth he desires."
9/11 --- approx "3000" dead souls
Oslo/Utoya --- 77 dead souls
London 7/7bombing --- 52 dead souls(+4 soulless suicidal muslim terrorists...)
Port Arthur massacre --- 35 dead souls
Queen's Day Apeldoorn Holland --- ???
(any more?)
********
(Admin edit): Sorry Rudy, but I just HAD to correct your official death-toll figures ... however bogus they all are!... - simon
-
- Member
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 3:15 pm
Re: THE "CHATBOX"
What to do in case of a school shooting (like ... eh ... Sandy Hook?):
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/17/us/in ... ef=us&_r=1
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/17/us/in ... ef=us&_r=1
-
- Member
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 1:27 am
Re: THE "CHATBOX"
@Simon
Most of the links are dead on "The September Clues Tour Guide," giving this
Server not found
Firefox can't find the server at www.september%20clues.info.
Check the address for typing errors such as ww.example.com instead of www.example.com
If you are unable to load any pages, check your computer's network connection.
If your computer or network is protected by a firewall or proxy, make sure that Firefox is permitted to access the Web.
http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=477
Is this temporary in lieu of entirely new addresses or will the old addresses be restored exactly as before?
I'm only asking because I have this entire page reproduced with every last direct link on at least 3 or 4 other pages on the net.
Most of the links are dead on "The September Clues Tour Guide," giving this
Server not found
Firefox can't find the server at www.september%20clues.info.
Check the address for typing errors such as ww.example.com instead of www.example.com
If you are unable to load any pages, check your computer's network connection.
If your computer or network is protected by a firewall or proxy, make sure that Firefox is permitted to access the Web.
http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=477
Is this temporary in lieu of entirely new addresses or will the old addresses be restored exactly as before?
I'm only asking because I have this entire page reproduced with every last direct link on at least 3 or 4 other pages on the net.
-
- Member
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 8:49 am
Re: THE "CHATBOX"
Google contact lens- 'virtual' technology?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/g ... etics.html
This claimed medical tech miracle seems extremely doubtful to me.
It isn't claiming to do anything like the highly-dubious 'Google Glass' augmented reality fairytale, but it's in the same vein.
What goes on, with this kind of sci-fi tech-news?
Perhaps I'm just becoming too much of a jaded sceptic, but stuff like this (and that Ryno one-wheeled motorcycle) instantly register on my instinctive BS detector. The gadget equivalents of 'reality' tv shows, I'd say.
But why? Most consumers will, I suppose, just suck up the saccharine. Perhaps this kind of techo-porn may help extend the bounds of credulity, to an ultimate point when people will simply believe literally everything that spills from their screens.
(Apologies- I feel we are all on safer ground trying to analyse visual imagery, but, being attuned to unrealistic storyboarding and scripting is an unavoidable part of being a truly-objective watcher of mainstream media).
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/g ... etics.html
This claimed medical tech miracle seems extremely doubtful to me.
It isn't claiming to do anything like the highly-dubious 'Google Glass' augmented reality fairytale, but it's in the same vein.
What goes on, with this kind of sci-fi tech-news?
Perhaps I'm just becoming too much of a jaded sceptic, but stuff like this (and that Ryno one-wheeled motorcycle) instantly register on my instinctive BS detector. The gadget equivalents of 'reality' tv shows, I'd say.
But why? Most consumers will, I suppose, just suck up the saccharine. Perhaps this kind of techo-porn may help extend the bounds of credulity, to an ultimate point when people will simply believe literally everything that spills from their screens.
(Apologies- I feel we are all on safer ground trying to analyse visual imagery, but, being attuned to unrealistic storyboarding and scripting is an unavoidable part of being a truly-objective watcher of mainstream media).
Re: THE "CHATBOX"
Just thought this a bit odd and possibly worth a mention.
Followed a link to 'Godlike Productions' ...can't remember what for, but instead of being entertained was informed that my IP address had been banned. Dunno...never commented on GLP and probably visited all but a couple of times. Any other CF members experience the same?
Followed a link to 'Godlike Productions' ...can't remember what for, but instead of being entertained was informed that my IP address had been banned. Dunno...never commented on GLP and probably visited all but a couple of times. Any other CF members experience the same?