When Ethnicities/Races/Cultures Collide

A place to relax and socialize - to muse, think aloud and suggest
Posts: 6929
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: When Ethnicities/Races/Cultures Collide

Unread post by simonshack » Thu Jul 04, 2013 11:15 am

Euphoria wrote: It makes me laugh how Scandinavians think that chains like Netto are 'superior' to the crap on offer elsewhere.

Simon, do you fancy a frozen pizza?! :lol:
Yeech - no thanks! :puke: :P

Oh well, fortunately I don't live in Scandinavia. Here's a typical dish I treat myself with - all with the produce of my own little orchard. It's hard work - what with the hoeing and hosing - but it's all well worth the trouble and sweat, believe me! (the only Scandinavian thing in this picture is my Swedish pinewood dinner table):


...and my Italian friends have also taught me the fine arts of homemade pizza, gnocchi and pasta! Yummy! :)

Posts: 5061
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:24 pm

Re: When Ethnicities/Races/Cultures Collide

Unread post by hoi.polloi » Thu Jul 04, 2013 12:54 pm

Food fight! :lol:

Posts: 644
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:53 am

Re: When Ethnicities/Races/Cultures Collide

Unread post by antipodean » Thu Jul 04, 2013 6:37 pm

Simon any good tips for growing aubergines, mine seem to grow quite small prior to rotting.

Posts: 6929
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: When Ethnicities/Races/Cultures Collide

Unread post by simonshack » Thu Jul 04, 2013 7:09 pm

antipodean wrote:Simon any good tips for growing aubergines, mine seem to grow quite small prior to rotting.
The melanzana (aubergine or 'egg-plant') needs warm temperatures - both at night(15-18C) and at daytime(at least 22-26C). Also, it doesn't like TOO much water - as it will develop a fungus called 'alterniarosi' (no idea how that would translate in English)which causes spots on both leaves and fruit and impedes the growth of the plant. I have had problems with my aubergines myself (they stay small) but am getting better at it! We all need to start learning how to grow our own vegetables, folks! It may soon be a matter of life or death! :P

(Only joking, folks...don't you ever suspect me of being the fear-mongering type!)


Life on this planet is beautiful - if we only learn how to convive with it.

Posts: 792
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:50 am

Re: When Ethnicities/Races/Cultures Collide

Unread post by anonjedi2 » Fri Jul 05, 2013 3:11 am

Just threw some eggplant on the grill myself today! Soaked in sea-salt water briefly and then brushed with some lemon, olive oil and spices. Delicious. :)


Posts: 644
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:53 am

Re: When Ethnicities/Races/Cultures Collide

Unread post by antipodean » Fri Jul 05, 2013 9:02 am

simonshack wrote:
antipodean wrote:Simon any good tips for growing aubergines, mine seem to grow quite small prior to rotting.
The melanzana (aubergine or 'egg-plant') needs warm temperatures - both at night(15-18C) and at daytime(at least 22-26C). Also, it doesn't like TOO much water - as it will develop a fungus called 'alterniarosi' (no idea how that would translate in English)which causes spots on both leaves and fruit and impedes the growth of the plant. I have had problems with my aubergines myself (they stay small) but am getting better at it! We all need to start learning how to grow our own vegetables, folks! It may soon be a matter of life or death! :P

(Only joking, folks...don't you ever suspect me of being the fear-mongering type!)


Life on this planet is beautiful - if we only learn how to convive with it.
That's interesting we had a long hot dry summer down here, after I planted the Aubergines seedlings all the other plants around them died off, yet the Aubergines took off displaying nice foliage, just have to work out exactly when to pick them.

teriyaki taryaki
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 1:27 am

Re: When Ethnicities/Races/Cultures Collide

Unread post by teriyaki taryaki » Fri Jul 12, 2013 1:07 am

Maat wrote:

Real racism = racial prejudice + systemic, institutional power. Saying non-whites can be racist too in a white-ruled nation denies the inherent power imbalance.
Only in collectivized liberal la-la land does denying an 'inherent power imbalance' automatically nullify a basic principle which applies to all individuals, and only through individuals, to groups.

What you really mean is 'results need to be equalized' by force to satisfy your idea of an equality that does not exist in nature and any inequality automatically implies an injustice or coercively achieved advantage (rather than simply better productive ability or talent) -- an absurd notion -- but one sold to millions of budding cultural Marxists every day in tens-of-thousands of indoctrination centers called schools and universities. The virus is the same, only the names have been changed.

“Naturally, the educated man does not believe in propaganda, he shrugs and is convinced that propaganda has no effect on him. This is, in fact, one of his great weaknesses, and propagandists are well aware that in order to reach someone, one must first convince him that propaganda is ineffectual and not very clever. Because he is convinced of his own superiority, the intellectual is much more vulnerable than anybody else to this maneuver.” ~ Jacques Ellul - “Propaganda, The Formation of Men's Attitudes"

If 'racism' is not 'racism' anytime you can detect 'a power imbalance' between two groups (provided the underdogs are never white Europeans, god forbid that horrific impossibility !! ), then theft is not theft, rape is not rape and even murder is not necessarily murder anytime you can detect a 'power imbalance' or 'exploitation' among two individuals and especially if one party belongs to a so-called oppressed minority group. See how it works ? Time to go sit on the OJ jury.

"Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law', because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual." "No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another, and this is all from which the laws ought to restrain him." ~ Thomas Jefferson to Francis Gilmer, 1816

Is an individual judged automatically through racial group affiliation (pre-judice) or through actual bad behavior confirming a racial stereotype formed through previous observed behaviors (post-judice) or good behavior transcending it (post-judice) ? If, based on the best available data at your disposal, the bad behaviors confirming the stereotypes are far more common than good behaviors transcending it, then post-judice based on these facts and exercising your inalienable free choice to act on it, is just rational action.

The smear term of 'racism,' therefore, seeks to prevent any rational action based on clearly observable general facts of group behavior where genetics is factored in because it would freely, naturally and through no physical coercion benefit certain groups and not others, especially the groups most threatening to the group 'in power' who can easily be proven to have achieved this power through massive fraud, coercion and parasitism and through no productive ability. The 'smear' is achieved by deliberately confusing pre-judice and post-judice, judgment before the facts which seeks to deny the individual's ability to transcend genetic background and the pressure of groups because of an irrational dislike or subjective preference and judgment after the facts which does not deny either the group behaviors or the individual exceptions.

In general, what is good for the physical and spiritual health of the human organism in the higher light of longer term consideration (which benefits from and includes helping as many people as you can without sacrificing yourself to them) is moral and what is harmful is immoral. Any other moral code is a fraud or deliberately propagated mental virus.

When philosophers realized that protecting people's right to make free choices was important this was not because they considered any two people 'equal' in anything but because they realized a much better way of achieving strength and might. The tremendous advantages of division of labor to a society are possible because of inequality in distribution of talents and abilities as well as background, nurture and upbringing.

Think about it.

No matter how well brought up you may be and how well-rounded a person, how 'superior' in certain abilities, it's still true that almost every single person you meet can do something potentially valuable much better than you, be it cooking, kicking soccer balls, math, lifting weights, vacuuming houses, running the 40 yard dash, the 3 legged race, digging ditches or photo analysis. It is also true that almost every single person you meet is willing to do something that you would not do for the same amount of compensation. It is not for you to judge the intelligence or foolishness of another person's free choice. If it is, in fact, a free choice and not coerced then to the degree of its rationality it will reward and to the degree of its irrationality it will punish and teach much swifter lessons than you ever could through lecturing and proselytizing.
Rights come from being human and having a bigger brain than apes. Humans have the brain capacity to make choices and therefore to make the RIGHT or WRONG choices. If you DENY that humans are able to perceive a complex reality and make choices then you deny that 'rights' (the very condition of being able to choose what is 'right' for you) exist which is like saying humans are no different than animals and operate only on instinct but the very fact of you even DENYING THAT RIGHTS EXIST proves that you are thinking and making choices as to 'what exists' and 'what does not exist' and therefore you negate yourself.

The right choices tend to benefit the organism, the wrong choices hurt it. This is the root of all morality and ethics, it has nothing to do with 'doing for others,' you 'do for others' only when 'doing for others' is seen by you in the higher light of long-term self-interest as being very reasonable, very 'right' and therefore 'GOOD FOR YOU.'

On a more advanced level, you can spend your whole life teaching others things with very little salary and direct monetary reward and still consider this absolutely rewarding to you spiritually in the longer term, so you keep doing it. The intellectual exercise becomes its own reward and it is perceived correctly by you as 'good for others' and 'good for you' at the same time, if you are an intellectual of this type since an ENTIRE SOCIETY and revolution can be created by your efforts in the future and even this is like a long-term project with each step of the way, each victory of the 'noble cause' being its own reward.

Therefore, PROTECTING the individual human's ability to MAKE FREE CHOICES is FUNDAMENTAL.

And that is the basis for rights being SELF-EVIDENT and inalienable. They are inalienable because alienating them results in regression into barbarism and anything goes 'might makes right.' There is nothing more to 'prove.'

This is the only and basic individual right, the right to think and make moral choices unmolested. Property rights are an extension of the 'right thinking' that created wealth versus the 'wrong thinking' that lost it or the 'predatory thinking' which took it from someone who did the 'right thinking.' Therefore, the predator, or the might-makes-rightist, modern or ancient, is penalized and punished in this system because it has been demonstrated that rights-make-the-most-might and if he won't learn his lesson, he risks being penalized out of that society.

If all individuals are made 'equal before the law' to pursue the happiness of their inevitably unequal results, then there will always be a 'power imbalance' even in the fairest, most libertarian society of win-win contracts and general goodwill, simply because no two human beings are equal and hence no two groups comprised of unequal individuals, no two results of any group endeavors and ultimately no two cultures. When a group or collective of unequal individuals achieve a consistency of behavior that tends towards the more or less homogeneous because they all adhere to certain basic principles, then these wealth-creating good-for-me compendium of moral choices results in what is called their cultural achievement.

When a person also observes that groups of unequal individuals whose behavior tends to be far more consistent than those of other groups are of similar genetic background and decides to become a 'racist' by considering the preservation of these genes an important factor, he or she is just making a free choice for better or worse and is not engaged in any coercive activity. If a large portion of an entire society makes similar free choices and decides to become 'racist,' then that's still not institutionalized 'violence' but simply an aggregate of free choices. It is only when initiation of force against individuals is 'institutionalized' that injustice or a violation of the inalienable natural right to free choice occurs and to initiate it in 'collective retaliation and collective punishment' is, in principle, as wrong as shooting the residents of an entire neighborhood for the crimes of a handful. It is coercion that is always the problem and not the free choice whether to factor in genetics into your thinking or not. ;)

teriyaki taryaki
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 1:27 am

Re: When Ethnicities/Races/Cultures Collide

Unread post by teriyaki taryaki » Fri Jul 12, 2013 6:34 pm

Maat wrote:

. . . in a white-ruled nation
Not 'white-ruled,' Jew-ruled.

Most Jews are genetically distinct from European whites and hence the reason they have their own race-specific hereditary disorders which are also further different among the Ashkenazi, Sephardic and Mizrahi lines:

http://www.jewishgenetics.org/?q=conten ... -disorders

http://www.jewishgenetics.org/?q=conten ... -disorders

http://www.jewishgenetics.org/?q=conten ... -disorders

http://www.jewishgeneticdiseases.org/wp ... 052112.pdf

The Jews that are not of Ashkenazi, Sephardic or Mizrahi heritage and convert are a tiny minority.

I've already posted extensively on why Jews and not the white European elites they collaborate with are at the top of the power pyramid due to their legalized monopoly on banking, usury and fractional reserve counterfeiting which has now spread to 155 nations after the destruction of Czarist Russia and then National Socialist Germany, Fascist Italy and Imperial Japan in WWII removed the last major successful beacons of resistance against them.

http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.ph ... 6&start=30

http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.ph ... 0&start=30

http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.ph ... 5&start=30

This International Banking money power monopoly and the vast centralized media monopoly and control it buys then inflicts PsyOp after PsyOp upon billions of people in order to advance its own agendas at the expense of everyone else. If you doubt this, go to these 17 countries

Bosnia and Herzegovina
Czech Republic
The Netherlands

and read in public some of the holohoax related posts right here on Clues forum and enjoy your long prison vacation and/or big fine. This is called learning the lesson of Voltaire the hard way:


Therefore it should come as little surprise that your own research here on Clues Forum points to four Jews: Rosenbaum, Silverstein, Feinberg, Hallerstein as the main culprits to interrogate to get at the bottom of who ordered the treasonous uber-fraud of 9-11. The problem with elite Jews is that they're control freaks and have a very hard time trusting gentile or goy front men, especially when they are perpetrating massive world-wide deceptions.

Maat wrote:

Real racism = racial prejudice + systemic, institutional power. Saying non-whites can be racist too in a white-ruled nation denies the inherent power imbalance.
Less than 5% of all whites in the Southern states ever owned black slaves and these were almost all rich plantation owners. These black slaves were brought over to the Americas on Jewish-owned slave ships. Yet 100% of whites today pay reparations to them through their taxes and are actively discriminated against by the legalized initiatory force of affirmative action, forced integration, etc.. This collective punishment is inflicted on behalf of the 'collective victims' of centuries old crimes, injustices and 'imbalances of power' that less than 5% of the whites alive today even indirectly benefited from through nepotism.

Less than 5% of all whites in the Southern states ever owned black slaves.

http://civilwartalk.com/threads/less-th ... ves.14868/
Ninety-Eight Percent of Texas Confederate Soldiers Never Owned A Slave

http://deadconfederates.com/2011/04/28/ ... d-a-slave/
"Among the enlistees in 1861, slightly more than one in ten owned slaves personally. This compared favorably to the Confederacy as a whole, in which one in every twenty white persons owned slaves." Joseph T. Glatthaar

http://www.amazon.com/General-Lees-Army ... 358&sr=1-1

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gaq3i4Algz8

Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews - Nation of Islam

http://www.abbc.net/islam/english/books ... 20Jews.pdf

Dr. Tony Martin - The Jewish Role in the African Slave Trade

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWXrJm9H1fk

Jewish Slave Ship Owners

For decades, the White people of America have been subjected to a continual barrage from Blacks and others that Europeans are somehow "responsible" for the African slave trade and that we need to "atone" for our "guilt." There are a number of flaws with the idea that we are somehow "responsible" for the African slave trade.

First, few White people even owned slaves--slavery was a rich man's pursuit, and slavery did not exist amongst the middle and working classes of White people.

Second, even if every European in America had an ancestor who owned slaves (which is an extremely unlikely proposition), it makes little sense to blame the children for the supposed sins of their fathers.

Third, Blacks sold their own kind into slavery, so blacks are every bit as much to blame for slavery as are Whites.

Fourth, European Whites did not bring the slaves to America. On the contrary, it was the Asiatic Jews who brought them here.

Below is a listing of the Jewish slave ships and the Jewish owners of them.

Name of ship Slave Ship Owners Owners' Ethnicity

Abigail Aaron Lopez, Moses Levy, Jacob Franks Jews
Crown Issac Levy and Nathan Simpson Jews
Nassau Moses Levy Jew
Four Sisters Moses Levy Jew
Anne & Eliza Justus Bosch and John Abrams Jews
Prudent Betty Henry Cruger and Jacob Phoenix Jews
Hester Mordecai and David Gomez Jews
Elizabeth Mordecai and David Gomez Jews
Antigua Nathan Marston and Abram Lyell Jews
Betsy Wm. De Woolf Jew
Polly Wm. De Woolf Jew
White Horse Jan de Sweevts Jews
Expedition John and Jacob Roosevelt Jews
Charlotte Moses and Sam Levy and Jacob Franks Jews
Caracoa Moses and Sam Levy Jews

Source: Elizabeth Donnan, 4 Volumes, 'Documents Illustrative of the History of the Slave Trade to America' Washington, D.C. 1930, 1935 Carnegie Institute of Technology, Pittsburgh, Pa.

In addition,

Rabbi Marc Lee Raphael

Rabbi Marc Lee Raphael is the Nathan and Sophia Gumenick Professor of Judaic Studies, Professor of Religion, and Chair, Department of Religion, The College of William and Mary, and a Visiting Fellow of Wolfson College, Oxford University. He has been the editor of the quarterly journal, American Jewish History, for 19 years, and a visiting professor at Brown University, the University of Pittsburgh, HUC-JIR, UCLA, and Case Western Reserve University. He came to The College of William and Mary in 1989 after 20 years at Ohio State University. He is the author of many books on Jews and Judaism in America, and his most recent publication (with his wife Linda Schermer Raphael) is When Night Fell: An Anthology of Holocaust Short Stories (Rutgers University Press, 1999). He is now writing Judaism in America for the Contemporary American Series of Columbia University Press. Visit him at the website of his synagoge, Bet Aviv, in Columbia, Maryland.

The following passages are from Dr. Raphael's book Jews and Judaism in the United States a Documentary History (New York: Behrman House, Inc., Pub, 1983), pp. 14, 23-25.

"Jews also took an active part in the Dutch colonial slave trade; indeed, the bylaws of the Recife and Mauricia congregations (1648) included an imposta (Jewish tax) of five soldos for each Negro slave a Brazilian Jew purchased from the West Indies Company. Slave auctions were postponed if they fell on a Jewish holiday. In Curacao in the seventeenth century, as well as in the British colonies of Barbados and Jamaica in the eighteenth century, Jewish merchants played a major role in the slave trade. In fact, in all the American colonies, whether French (Martinique), British, or Dutch, Jewish merchants frequently dominated."

"This was no less true on the North American mainland, where during the eighteenth century Jews participated in the 'triangular trade' that brought slaves from Africa to the West Indies and there exchanged them for molasses, which in turn was taken to New England and converted into rum for sale in Africa. Isaac Da Costa of Charleston in the 1750's, David Franks of Philadelphia in the 1760's, and Aaron Lopez of Newport in the late 1760's and early 1770's dominated Jewish slave trading on the American continent."

Dr. Raphael discusses the central role of the Jews in the New World commerce and the African slave trade (pp. 23-25):


During the sixteenth century, exiled from their Spanish homeland and hard-pressed to escape the clutches of the Inquisition, Spanish and Portuguese Jews fled to the Netherlands; the Dutch enthusiastically welcomed these talented, skilled businessmen. While thriving in Amsterdam-where they became the hub of a unique urban Jewish universe and attained status that anticipated Jewish emancipation in the West by over a century-they began in the 1500's and 1600's to establish themselves in the Dutch and English colonies in the New World. These included Curacao, Surinam, Recife, and New Amsterdam (Dutch) as well as Barbados, Jamaica, Newport, and Savannah (English). In these European outposts the Jews, with their years of mercantile experience and networks of friends and family providing market reports of great use, played a significant role in the merchant capitalism, commercial revolution, and territorial expansion that developed the New World and established the colonial economies. The Jewish-Caribbean nexus provided Jews with the opportunity to claim a disproportionate influence in seventeenth and eighteenth century New World commerce, and enabled West Indian Jewry-far outnumbering its coreligionists further north-to enjoy a centrality which North American Jewry would not achieve for a long time to come.

Groups of Jews began to arrive in Surinam in the middle of the seventeenth century, after the Portuguese regained control of northern Brazil. By 1694, twenty-seven years after the British had surrendered Surinam to the Dutch, there were about 100 Jewish families and fifty single Jews there, or about 570 persons. They possessed more than forty estates and 9,000 slaves, contributed 25,905 pounds of sugar as a gift for the building of a hospital, and carried on an active trade with Newport and other colonial ports. By 1730, Jews owned 115 plantations and were a large part of a sugar export business which sent out 21,680,000 pounds of sugar to European and New World markets in 1730 alone.

Slave trading was a major feature of Jewish economic life in Surinam which as a major stopping-off point in the triangular trade. Both North American and Caribbean Jews played a key role in this commerce: records of a slave sale in 1707 reveal that the ten largest Jewish purchasers (10,400 guilders) spent more than 25 percent of the total funds (38,605 guilders) exchanged.

Jewish economic life in the Dutch West Indies, as in the North American colonies, consisted primarily of mercantile communities, with large inequities in the distribution of wealth. Most Jews were shopkeepers, middlemen, or petty merchants who received encouragement and support from Dutch authorities. In Curacao, for example, Jewish communal life began after the Portuguese victory in 1654. In 1656 the community founded a congregation, and in the early 1670's brought its first rabbi to the island. Curacao, with its large natural harbor, was the stepping-stone to the other Caribbean islands and thus ideally suited geographically for commerce. The Jews were the recipients of favorable charters containing generous economic privileges granted by the Dutch West Indies Company in Amsterdam. The economic life of the Jewish community of Curacao revolved around ownership of sugar plantations and marketing of sugar, the importing of manufactured goods, and a heavy involvement in the slave trade, within a decade of their arrival, Jews owned 80 percent of the Curacao plantations. The strength of the Jewish trade lay in connections in Western Europe as well as ownership of the ships used in commerce. While Jews carried on an active trade with French and English colonies in the Caribbean, their principal market was the Spanish Main (today Venezuela and Colombia).

Extant tax lists give us a glimpse of their dominance. Of the eighteen wealthiest Jews in the 1702 and 1707 tax lists, nine either owned a ship or had at least a share in a vessel. By 1721 a letter to the Amsterdam Jewish community claimed that "nearly all the navigation...was in the hands of the Jews."' Yet another indication of the economic success of Curacao's Jews is the fact that in 1707 the island's 377 residents were assessed by the Governor and his Council a total of 4,002 pesos; 104 Jews, or 27.6 percent of the taxpayers, contributed 1,380 pesos, or 34.5 percent of the entire amount assessed.

In the British West Indies, two 1680 tax lists survive, both from Barbados; they, too, provide useful information about Jewish economic life. In Bridgetown itself, out of a total of 404 households, 54 households or 300 persons were Jewish, 240 of them living in "ye Towne of S. Michael ye Bridge Town." Contrary to most impressions, "many, indeed, most of them, were very poor." There were only a few planters, and most Jews were not naturalized or endenizened (and thus could not import goods or pursue debtors in court). But for merchants holding letters of endenization, opportunities were not lacking. Barbados sugar-and its by-products rum and molasses-were in great demand, and in addition to playing a role in its export, Jewish merchants were active in the import trade. Forty-five Jewish households were taxed in Barbados in 1680, and more than half of them contributed only 11.7 percent of the total sum raised. While the richest five gave almost half the Jewish total, they were but 11.1 percent of the taxable population. The tax list of 1679-80 shows a similar picture; of fifty-one householders, nineteen (37.2 percent) gave less than one-tenth of the total, while the four richest merchants gave almost one-third of the total.

An interesting record of inter island trade involving a Jewish merchant and the islands of Barbados and Curacao comes from correspondence of 1656. It reminds us that sometimes the commercial trips were not well planned and that Jewish captains-who frequently acted as commercial agents as well-would decide where to sell their cargo, at what price, and what goods to bring back on the return trip

http://www.scribd.com/doc/69689942/Jewi ... hip-Owners
So, while the entire world is programmed to cry endless rivers of tears for the black slaves of less than 5% of the white American population by being sold the lie that it was a much higher percentage & that it was whites, not Jews, who owned most of the slave ships, let's also shed a few drops for the many deliberately forgotten white slaves of history, shall we ?


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ugo1YxZWWJ8

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSMj4Ove-5Y

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-_KssKiM20



The Forgotten Slaves: Whites in Servitude in Early America and Industrial Britain

by Michael A. Hoffman II



Two years ago, Prime Minister Paul Keating of Australia refused to show "proper respect" to Britain's Queen Elizabeth II during her state visit. In response, Terry Dicks, a Conservative member of the British Parliament said, "It's a country of ex-convicts, so we should not be surprised by the rudeness of their prime minister."

A slur such as this would be considered unthinkable if it were uttered against any other class or race of people except the descendants of White slavery. Dicks' remark is not only offensive, it is ignorant and false. Most of Australia's "convicts" were shipped into servitude for such "crimes" as stealing seven yards of lace, cutting trees on an aristocrat's estate or poaching sheep to feed a starving family.

The arrogant disregard for the holocaust visited upon the poor and working class Whites of Britain by the aristocracy continues in our time because the history of that epoch has been almost completely extirpated from our collective memory.

When White servitude is acknowledged as having existed in America, it is almost always termed as temporary "indentured servitude" or part of the convict trade, which, after the Revolution of 1776, centered on Australia instead of America. The "convicts" transported to America under the 1723 Waltham Act, perhaps numbered 100,000.

The indentured servants who served a tidy little period of 4 to 7 years polishing the master's silver and china and then taking their place in colonial high society, were a minuscule fraction of the great unsung hundreds of thousands of White slaves who were worked to death in this country from the early l7th century onward.

Up to one-half of all the arrivals in the American colonies were Whites slaves and they were America's first slaves. These Whites were slaves for life, long before Blacks ever were. This slavery was even hereditary. White children born to White slaves were enslaved too.
Whites were auctioned on the block with children sold and separated from their parents and wives sold and separated from their husbands. Free Black property owners strutted the streets of northern and southern American cities while White slaves were worked to death in the sugar mills of Barbados and Jamaica and the plantations of Virginia.

The Establishment has created the misnomer of "indentured servitude" to explain away and minimize the fact of White slavery. But bound Whites in early America called themselves slaves. Nine-tenths of the White slavery in America was conducted without indentures of any kind but according to the so-called "custom of the country," as it was known, which was lifetime slavery administered by the White slave merchants themselves.
In George Sandys laws for Virginia, Whites were enslaved "forever." The service of Whites bound to Berkeley's Hundred was deemed "perpetual."

These accounts have been policed out of the much touted "standard reference works" such as Abbott Emerson Smith's laughable whitewash, Colonists in Bondage.

I challenge any researcher to study 17th century colonial America, sifting the documents, the jargon and the statutes on both sides of the Atlantic and one will discover that White slavery was a far more extensive operation than Black enslavement. It is when we come to the 18th century that one begins to encounter more "servitude" on the basis of a contract of indenture. But even in that period there was kidnapping of Anglo-Saxons into slavery as well as convict slavery.

In 1855, Frederic Law Olmsted, the landscape architect who designed New York's Central Park, was in Alabama on a pleasure trip and saw bales of cotton being thrown from a considerable height into a cargo ship's hold. The men tossing the bales somewhat recklessly into the hold were Negroes, the men in the hold were Irish.

Olmsted inquired about this to a shipworker. "Oh," said the worker, "the niggers are worth too much to be risked here; if the Paddies are knocked overboard or get their backs broke, nobody loses anything."

Before British slavers traveled to Africa's western coast to buy Black slaves from African chieftains, they sold their own White working class kindred ("the surplus poor" as they were known) from the streets and towns of England, into slavery. Tens of thousands of these White slaves were kidnapped children. In fact the very origin of the word kidnapped is kid-nabbed, the stealing of White children for enslavement.

According to the English Dictionary of the Underworld, under the heading kidnapper is the following definition: "A stealer of human beings, esp. of children; originally for exportation to the plantations of North America."

The center of the trade in child-slaves was in the port cities of Britain and Scotland:

"Press gangs in the hire of local merchants roamed the streets, seizing 'by force such boys as seemed proper subjects for the slave trade.' Children were driven in flocks through the town and confined for shipment in barns...So flagrant was the practice that people in the countryside about Aberdeen avoided bringing children into the city for fear they might be stolen; and so widespread was the collusion of merchants, shippers, suppliers and even magistrates that the man who exposed it was forced to recant and run out of town." (Van der Zee, Bound Over, p. 210).

White slaves transported to the colonies suffered a staggering loss of life in the 17th and 18th century. During the voyage to America it was customary to keep the White slaves below deck for the entire nine to twelve week journey. A White slave would be confined to a hole not more than sixteen feet long, chained with 50 other men to a board, with padlocked collars around their necks. The weeks of confinement below deck in the ship's stifling hold often resulted in outbreaks of contagious disease which would sweep through the "cargo" of White "freight" chained in the bowels of the ship.

Ships carrying White slaves to America often lost half their slaves to death. According to historian Sharon V. Salinger, "Scattered data reveal that the mortality for [White] servants at certain times equaled that for [Black] slaves in the 'middle passage,' and during other periods actually exceeded the death rate for [Black] slaves." Salinger reports a death rate of ten to twenty percent over the entire 18th century for Black slaves on board ships enroute to America compared with a death rate of 25% for White slaves enroute to America.

Foster R. Dulles writing in Labor in America: A History, states that whether convicts, children 'spirited' from the countryside or political prisoners, White slaves "experienced discomforts and sufferings on their voyage across the Atlantic that paralleled the cruel hardships undergone by negro slaves on the notorious Middle Passage."

Dulles says the Whites were "indiscriminately herded aboard the 'white guineamen,' often as many as 300 passengers on little vessels of not more than 200 tons burden--overcrowded, unsanitary...The mortality rate was sometimes as high as 50% and young children seldom survived the horrors of a voyage which might last anywhere from seven to twelve weeks."

Independent investigator A.B. Ellis in the Argosy writes concerning the transport of White slaves, "The human cargo, many of whom were still tormented by unhealed wounds, could not all lie down at once without lying on each other. They were never suffered to go on deck. The hatchway was constantly watched by sentinels armed with hangers and blunder busses. In the dungeons below all was darkness, stench, lamentation, disease and death."

Marcus Jernegan describes the greed of the shipmasters which led to horrendous loss of life for White slaves transported to America:
"The voyage over often repeated the horrors of the famous 'middle passage' of slavery fame. An average cargo was three hundred, but the shipmaster, for greater profit, would sometimes crowd as many as six hundred into a small vessel...The mortality under such circumstances was tremendous, sometimes more than half...Mittelberger (an eyewitness) says he saw thirty-two children thrown into the ocean during one voyage."
"The mercantile firms, as importers of (White) servants, were not too careful about their treatment, as the more important purpose of the transaction was to get ships over to South Carolina which could carry local produce back to Europe. Consequently the Irish--as well as others--suffered greatly...

"It was almost as if the British merchants had redirected their vessels from the African coast to the Irish coast, with the white servants coming over in much the same fashion as the African slaves." (Warren B. Smith, White Servitude in Colonial South Carolina).
A study of the middle passage of White slaves was included in a Parliamentary Petition of 1659. It reported that White slaves were locked below deck for two weeks while the slaveship was still in port. Once under way, they were "all the way locked up under decks...amongst horses." They were chained from their legs to their necks.

Those academics who insist that slavery is an exclusively Black racial condition forget or deliberately omit the fact that the word slave originally was a reference to Whites of East European origin - "Slavs."

Moreover, in the 18th century in Britain and America, the Industrial Revolution spawned the factory system whose first laborers were miserably oppressed White children as young as six years of age. They were locked in the factories for sixteen hours a day and mangled by the primitive machinery. Hands and arms were regularly ripped to pieces. Little girls often had their hair caught in the machinery and were scalped from their foreheads to the back of their necks.

White Children wounded and crippled in the factories were turned out without compensation of any kind and left to die of their injuries. Children late to work or who fell asleep were beaten with iron bars. Lest we imagine these horrors were limited to only the early years of the Industrial Revolution, eight and ten year old White children throughout America were hard at work in miserable factories and mines as late as 1920.
Because of the rank prostitution, stupidity and cowardice of America's teachers and educational system, White youth are taught that Black slaves, Mexican peons and Chinese coolies built this country while the vast majority of the Whites lorded it over them with a lash in one hand and a mint julep in the other.

The documentary record tells a very different story, however. When White Congressman David Wilmot authored the Wilmot Proviso to keep Black slaves out of the American West he did so, he said, to preserve that vast expanse of territory for "the sons of toil, my own race and color."
This is precisely what most White people in America were, "sons of toil," performing backbreaking labor such as few of us today can envision. They had no paternalistic welfare system; no Freedman's Bureau to coo sweet platitudes to them; no army of bleeding hearts to worry over their hardships. These Whites were the expendable frontline soldiers in the expansion of the American frontier. They won the country, felled the trees, cleared and planted the land.

The wealthy, educated White elite in America are the sick heirs of what Charles Dickens in Bleak House termed "telescopic philanthropy"--the concern for the condition of distant peoples while the plight of kindred in one's own backyard are ignored.

Today much of what we see on "Turner Television" and Pat Robertson's misnamed "Family Channel," are TV films depicting Blacks in chains, Blacks being whipped, Blacks oppressed. Nowhere can we find a cinematic chronicle of the Whites who were beaten and killed in White slavery. Four-fifths of the White slaves sent to Britain's sugar colonies in the West Indies did not survive their first year.

Soldiers in the American Revolution and sailors impressed into the American navy received upwards of two hundred whiplashes for minor infractions. But no TV show lifts the shirt of these White yeoman to reveal the scars on their backs.

The Establishment would rather weep over the poor persecuted Negroes, but leave the White working class "rednecks" and "crackers" (both of these terms of derision were first applied to White slaves), to live next door to the Blacks.

Little has changed since the early 1800s when the men of property and station of the English Parliament outlawed Black slavery throughout the Empire. While this Parliament was in session to enact this law, ragged five year old White orphan boys, beaten, starved and whipped, were being forced up the chimneys of the English parliament, to clean them. Sometimes the chimney masonry collapsed on these boys. Other times they suffocated to death inside their narrow smoke channels.

Long after Blacks were free throughout the British Empire, the British House of Lords refused to abolish chimney-sweeping by White children under the age of ten. The Lords contended that to do so would interfere with "property rights." The lives of the White children were not worth a farthing and were considered no subject for humanitarian concern.

The chronicle of White slavery in America comprises the dustiest shelf in the darkest corner of suppressed American history. Should the truth about that epoch ever emerge into the public consciousness of Americans, the whole basis for the swindle of "Affirmative action," "minority set-asides" and proposed "Reparations to African-Americans" will be swept away. The fact is, the White working people of this country owe no one. They are themselves the descendants, as Congressman Wilmot so aptly said, of "the sons of toil."

There will only be racial peace when knowledge of radical historical truths are widespread and both sides negotiate from positions of strength and not from fantasies of White working class guilt and the uniqueness of Black suffering.

Let it be said, in many cases Blacks in slavery had it better than poor Whites in the antebellum South. This is why there was such strong resistance to the Confederacy in the poverty-stricken areas of the mountain south, such as Winston County in Alabama and the Beech mountains of North Carolina. Those poor Whites could not imagine why any White laborer would want to die for the slave-owning plutocracy that more often than not, gave better care and attention to their Black servants than they did to the free white labor they scorned as "trash."

To this day, the White ruling class denigrates the White poor and patronizes Blacks.

If this seems admirable from the pathological viewpoint of Marxism or cosmopolitan liberalism, the Black and Third World "beneficiaries" of White ruling class "esteem" ought to consider what sort of "friends" they actually have.

The Bible declares that the man who does not take care of his own family is "worse than an infidel." This also applies to one's racial kindred. The man who neglects his own children to care for yours has true love for neither.

White, self-hating liberals and greed-head conservatives who claim to care for the "civil rights" of Black and Third World people, discard the working class of their own people on the garbage heap of history. When they are finished with their own they shall surely turn on others.

Those who care for their own kind first are not practicing "hate" but kindness, which is the very root of the word.



Posts: 5061
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:24 pm

Re: When Ethnicities/Races/Cultures Collide

Unread post by hoi.polloi » Wed Jul 17, 2013 4:32 am

Thank you for pointing out the research of Tony Martin. I hadn't heard of him before. You have really offended my sensibilities but I guess that's okay.

I think you make some good points, and you are right to defend whatever you define as your community. It doesn't detract from the fact that you are a very racist person and your hatred and resentment and bitterness tints everything you have been writing.

But I respect your hatred on a certain level. You have the right to have it. However you are also wrong about some things and if you are going to be a white supremacist, you should get your facts right. It's not so simple to say things like:
Yet 100% of whites today pay reparations to them through their taxes and are actively discriminated against by the legalized initiatory force of affirmative action, forced integration, etc.
Not everyone pays taxes. Not everyone is actively (as in deliberately) discriminated against. Not everyone feels integration is "forced" and particularly not any one color of people; many of your concepts of miscegenation are misguided, because you haven't met the loving interracial couples that prove you are wrong that it's all forced and akin to rape culture. There has been a strong sexual and loving attraction between people of different cultures and ethnicities for as long as time remembers. Just like you can't claim segregation is forced on everyone (or everyone of one color), you can't claim integration is. It's very complex. I am criticizing your stance that you've posted as a whole on this forum, not just the last couple posts you have used to try to equivocate your position.

Plus, while affirmative action remains very controversial in some ways, please understand that it's not going to be the prerogative of every oppressed people to just roll over and accept legal measures as they are. There has been a certain amount of struggle. There is a certain amount of over-compensation and push-back to assure future generations of interracial children and families that there is going to be equal protection. Not to mention families of "pure" "minority races" who may collectively face discrimination in different ways.

In particular, the African enslavement that you blame on Africans themselves is a bit insidious and twisted. Did you know that Jews also ran the rum businesses of the Boston area which were used to drug and intoxicate tribal leaders? Of course, some leaders really believed they were getting some kind of promise, some kind of deal out of the arrangement and it has taken many years to see any remote remnants of the promises given to them actually see the light of day, such as opportunity to be a part of the "rich" new world. Does that mean they weren't deceived, lied to, tricked and played in an unfair game of life and death?

Feel free to hold your opinions about your superiority, but don't try to back-pedal it when it's pointed out that not everyone should bow down in thanks to the white race gods you believe in.

Thanks for any good research you have found that turns out to be true and not tainted, but you present it in a very slimy and unappealing way. And for that, shame on you for making the truth feel like it's a disgusting endorsement of hatred and prejudice and conceit. However, some of what you say deserves looking into. So again thank you. Sorry I can't be more gracious about it right now. But you kind of make me want to puke.

Posts: 2239
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:49 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: When Ethnicities/Races/Cultures Collide

Unread post by fbenario » Thu Jul 18, 2013 12:53 am

hoi.polloi wrote:It doesn't detract from the fact that you are a very racist person and your hatred and resentment and bitterness tints everything you have been writing.
... and unfortunately taints the forum, also. It disgusts me that people may discount our research and its implications because they think we like and permit white-supremacy posts.

This member's recent posts should be removed, or at least moved to The Derailing Room with an Admin's notation that we find them reprehensible.

Posts: 853
Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 10:01 pm

Re: When Ethnicities/Races/Cultures Collide

Unread post by bostonterrierowner » Sat Jul 20, 2013 6:45 pm

Why do I think TT is a troll ? Well he made some sense in the beginning but now it looks like his only task is associating our forum with the racist and homophobic content .

He refuses to look at facts and see Nazi Germany as another zionist undertaking aimed at destroying industrial and military power of this country so I it could never rival Anglo-American empire .

He frequently links to various MSM material and expect us to take it at its face value . Are you aware of media fakery TT ? Are you one of these people that selectively believe and disbelieve what suits them ?

You write about the Jews a lot but do you know anything about Jewish surnames and how they evolved ?

Lots of "researchers" you quote and want us believe are anti Zionist have Jewish names :)

Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 3:53 am

Re: When Ethnicities/Races/Cultures Collide

Unread post by djeminy » Sun Jul 21, 2013 1:53 pm

Truth comes in many different ways:

"Persons who despise or hate other nations or other races
will in the next succeeding incarnations invariably be born
among them, so that they may learn to love those whom
they previously hated."

At the moment TT's future 'fate' seems rather bleak -
as one could say with some amount of sadness!!


teriyaki taryaki
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 1:27 am

Re: When Ethnicities/Races/Cultures Collide

Unread post by teriyaki taryaki » Sun Jul 28, 2013 2:45 pm

What is "Political Correctness"?

William S. Lind

Most Americans look back on the 1950s as a good time. Our homes were safe, to the point where many people did not bother to lock their doors. Public schools were generally excellent, and their problems were things like talking in class and running in the halls. Most men treated women like ladies, and most ladies devoted their time and effort to making good homes, rearing their children well and helping their communities through volunteer work. Children grew up in two-parent households, and the mother was there to meet the child when he came home from school. Entertainment was something the whole family could enjoy.

What happened?

If a man from America of the 1950s were suddenly introduced into America in the 2000s, he would hardly recognize it as the same country. He would be in immediate danger of getting mugged, carjacked or worse, because he would not have learned to live in constant fear. He would not know that he shouldn't go into certain parts of the city, that his car must not only be locked but equipped with an alarm, that he dare not go to sleep at night without locking the windows and bolting the doors - and setting the electronic security system.

If he brought his family with him, he and his wife would probably cheerfully pack their children off to the nearest public school. When the children came home in the afternoon and told them they had to go through a metal detector to get in the building, had been given some funny white powder by another kid and learned that homosexuality is normal and good, the parents would be uncomprehending.

In the office, the man might light up a cigarette, drop a reference to the "little lady," and say he was happy to see the firm employing some Negroes in important positions. Any of those acts would earn a swift reprimand, and together they might get him fired.

When she went into the city to shop, the wife would put on a nice suit, hat, and possibly gloves. She would not understand why people stared, and mocked.

And when the whole family sat down after dinner and turned on the television, they would not understand how pornography from some sleazy, blank-fronted "Adults Only" kiosk had gotten on their set.

Were they able, our 1950s family would head back to the 1950s as fast as they could, with a gripping horror story to tell. Their story would be of a nation that had decayed and degenerated at a fantastic pace, moving in less than a half a century from the greatest country on earth to a Third World nation, overrun by crime, noise, drugs and dirt. The fall of Rome was graceful by comparison.

Why did it happen?

Over the last forty years, America has been conquered by the same force that earlier took over Russia, China, Germany and Italy. That force is ideology. Here, as elsewhere, ideology has inflicted enormous damage on the traditional culture it came to dominate, fracturing it everywhere and sweeping much of it away. In its place came fear, and ruin. Russia will take a generation or more to recover from Communism, if it ever can.

The ideology that has taken over America goes most commonly by the name of "Political Correctness." Some people see it as a joke. It is not. It is deadly serious. It seeks to alter virtually all the rules, formal and informal, that govern relations among people and institutions. It wants to change behavior, thought, even the words we use. To a significant extent, it already has. Whoever or whatever controls language also controls thought. Who dares to speak of "ladies" now?

Just what is "Political Correctness?" Political Correctness is in fact cultural Marxism - Marxism translated from economic into cultural terms. The effort to translate Marxism from economics into culture did not begin with the student rebellion of the 1960s. It goes back at least to the 1920s and the writings of the Italian Communist Antonio Gramsci. In 1923, in Germany, a group of Marxists founded an institute devoted to making the transition, the Institute of Social Research (later known as the Frankfurt School). One of its founders, George Lukacs, stated its purpose as answering the question, "Who shall save us from Western Civilization?" The Frankfurt School gained profound influence in American universities after many of its leading lights fled to the United States in the 1930s to escape National Socialism in Germany.

The Frankfurt School blended Marx with Freud, and later influences (some Fascist as well as Marxist) added linguistics to create "Critical Theory" and "deconstruction." These in turn greatly influenced education theory, and through institutions of higher education gave birth to what we now call "Political Correctness." The lineage is clear, and it is traceable right back to Karl Marx.

The parallels between the old, economic Marxism and cultural Marxism are evident. Cultural Marxism, or Political Correctness, shares with classical Marxism the vision of a "classless society," i.e., a society not merely of equal opportunity, but equal condition. Since that vision contradicts human nature - because people are different, they end up unequal, regardless of the starting point - society will not accord with it unless forced. So, under both variants of Marxism, it is forced. This is the first major parallel between classical and cultural Marxism: both are totalitarian ideologies. The totalitarian nature of Political Correctness can be seen on campuses where "PC" has taken over the college: freedom of speech, of the press, and even of thought are all eliminated.

The second major parallel is that both classical, economic Marxism and cultural Marxism have single-factor explanations of history. Classical Marxism argues that all of history was determined by ownership of the means of production. Cultural Marxism says that history is wholly explained by which groups - defined by sex, race, and sexual normality or abnormality - have power over which other groups.

The third parallel is that both varieties of Marxism declare certain groups virtuous and others evil a priori, that is, without regard for the actual behavior of individuals. Classical Marxism defines workers and peasants as virtuous and the bourgeoisie (the middle class) and other owners of capital as evil. Cultural Marxism defines blacks, Hispanics, Feminist women, homosexuals and some additional minority groups as virtuous and white men as evil. (Cultural Marxism does not recognize the existence of non-Feminist women, and defines blacks who reject Political Correctness as whites).

The fourth parallel is in means: expropriation. Economic Marxists, where they obtained power, expropriated the property of the bourgeoisie and handed it to the state, as the "representative" of the workers and the peasants. Cultural Marxists, when they gain power (including through our own government), lay penalties on white men and others who disagree with them and give privileges to the groups they favor. Affirmative action is an example.

Finally, both varieties of Marxists employ a method of analysis designed to show the correctness of their ideology in every situation. For classical Marxists, the analysis is economic. For cultural Marxists, the analysis is linguistic: deconstruction. Deconstruction "proves" that any "text," past or present, illustrates the oppression of blacks, women, homosexuals, etc. by reading that meaning into words of the text (regardless of their actual meaning). Both methods are, of course, phony analyses that twist the evidence to fit preordained conclusions, but they lend a 'scientific" air to the ideology.

These parallels are neither remarkable nor coincidental. They exist because Political Correctness is directly derived from classical Marxism, and is in fact a variant of Marxism. Through most of the history of Marxism, cultural Marxists were "read out" of the movement by classical, economic Marxists. Today, with economic Marxism dead, cultural Marxism has filled its shoes. The medium has changed, but the message is the same: a society of radical egalitarianism enforced by the power of the state.

Political Correctness now looms over American society like a colossus. It has taken over both political parties - recent Republican conventions were choreographed according to its dictates, while cultural conservatives were shown the door - and is enforced by many laws and government regulations. It controls the most powerful element in our culture, the entertainment industry. It dominates both public and higher education: many a college campus is a small, ivy-covered North Korea. It has even captured the higher clergy in many Christian churches. Anyone in the Establishment who departs from its dictates swiftly ceases to be a member of the Establishment.

The remainder of this short book will explore the subject of Political Correctness further: its history, its method of analysis (deconstruction), and the means by which it has attained its influence, especially through education.

But one more question must be addressed at the outset, the most vital question: how can Americans combat Political Correctness and retake their society from the cultural Marxists?

It is not sufficient just to criticize Political Correctness. It tolerates a certain amount of criticism., even gentle mocking. It does so through no genuine tolerance for other points of view, but in order to disarm its opponents, to let itself seem less menacing than it is. The cultural Marxists do not yet have total power, and they are too wise to appear totalitarian until their victory is assured.

Rather, those who would defeat cultural Marxism must defy it. They must use words it forbids, and refuse to use the words it mandates;
remember, sex is better than gender. They must shout from the housetops the realities it seeks to suppress, such as the facts that violent crime is disproportionately committed by blacks and that most cases of AIDS are voluntary, i.e., acquired from immoral sexual acts. They must refuse to turn their children over to public schools.

Above all, those who would defy Political Correctness must behave according to the old rules of our culture, not the new rules the cultural Marxists lay down. Ladies should be wives and homemakers, not cops or soldiers, and men should still hold doors open for ladies. Children should not be born out of wedlock. Open homosexuality should be shunned. Jurors should not accept race as an excuse for murder.

Defiance spreads. When other Americans see one person defy Political Correctness and survive - and you still can, for now - they are emboldened. They are tempted to defy it, too, and some do. The ripples from a single act of defiance, of one instance of walking up to the clay idol and breaking off its nose, can range far. There is nothing the Politically Correct fear more than open defiance, and for good reason; it is their chief vulnerability. That should lead cultural conservatives to defy cultural Marxism at every turn.

While the hour is late, the battle is not decided. Very few Americans realize that Political Correctness is in fact Marxism in a different set of clothes. As that realization spreads, defiance will spread with it. At present, Political Correctness prospers by disguising itself. Through defiance, and through education on our own part (which should be part of every act of defiance), we can strip away its camouflage and reveal the Marxism beneath the window-dressing of "sensitivity," "tolerance," and "multi-culturalism."

http://www.gnosticliberationfront.com/w ... ctness.htm
With regard to his claims about 'AIDS being voluntary,' Mr. Lind should listen to the following audio interview which completely exposes the HIV/AIDS media and medical establishment coordinated PsyOp for the fraud that it is :

The Morning Show with Patrick Timpone - 08 / 14 / 2012

Guest: Christl Meyer - AIDS: Did it ever REALLY exist?


http://www.oneradionetwork2.com/mp3/hea ... l_aids.mp3

Biologist and researcher Christl Meyer joined join us at 9am Central. Ms. Meyer has provided scientific evidence proving without doubt that the so called “HIV-virus”, which is claimed to be the cause of AIDS, does not exist, and that the definitions of “AID$” are sporadic and non specific, and the alleged syndrome is a cluster of OLD familiar diseases and not a disease of its own.

Ms. Meyer talks about HIV testing and how it is unreliable and meaningless to boot and that pregnant women and children, in some cases, are forced to take medication. HIV is part of the human genome in Chromosome #6, we all have it. That’s the bottom line.

http://oneradionetwork.com/health/biolo ... t-14-2012/

teriyaki taryaki
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 1:27 am

Re: When Ethnicities/Races/Cultures Collide

Unread post by teriyaki taryaki » Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:35 am

Dubai pardons Norwegian woman jailed for being raped

By Brian Murphy

Associated Press

Posted: 07/22/2013 08:53:51 AM PDT
Updated: 07/22/2013 02:57:44 PM PDT

Marte Dalelv from Norway flashes a smile at the Norwegian Seamen's Center in Dubai, on July 22, 2013 after she was pardoned by Dubai ruler Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al-Maktoum of an extramarital sex charge and allowed to fly home. Dalelv, 24, risked 16 months in jail after being convicted last week by a Dubai court of extramarital sex, perjury and consuming alcohol without licence after she reported being raped by a co-worker in the UAE. AFP PHOTO/KARIM SAHIBKARIM SAHIB/AFP/Getty Images ( KARIM SAHIB )


DUBAI, United Arab Emirates -- A Norwegian woman at the center of a Dubai rape claim dispute said Monday that officials have dropped her 16-month sentence for having sex outside marriage and she is free to leave the country.
"I am very, very happy," Marte Deborah Dalelv told The Associated Press. "I am overjoyed."

The sentence against the 24-year-old Dalelv last week stirred widespread outrage in the West and highlighted the frequent clash between Dubai's Western-friendly image and its Islamic-based legal codes.

Dalelv claimed she was raped in March by a co-worker, but was charged with having sex outside marriage after going to the police. Her decision to go public about the sentence last week in a series of interviews appeared to put pressure on authorities in Dubai and tarnish the city's reputation as a cosmopolitan hub, including possible fallout on its high-profile bid for the 2020 World Expo.

"I have my passport back. I am pardoned," said Dalelv, who worked for an interior design firm in Qatar and was in Dubai for a business meeting when the alleged rape took place.

There was no immediate word from Dubai officials, including whether the pardon was linked to traditions of clemency during the current Islamic holy month of Ramadan. :P

It also was unclear whether authorities would keep the 13-month sentence against Dalelv's alleged attacker, identified as a 33-year-old Sudanese man who was charged with consuming alcohol and sex outside marriage. While liquor is widely available in Dubai hotels and restaurants, public intoxication can bring serious charges.

"I have my life back," said Dalelv. "This is a great day."

In Norway, Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide posted a Twitter message: "Marte is released! Thanks to everyone who signed up to help."
Barth Eide told the Norwegian news agency NTB that international media attention and Norway's diplomatic measures helped Dalelv, who was free on appeal with her next court hearing scheduled for early September. Norway also reminded the United Arab Emirates of obligations under U.N. accords to seriously investigate claims of violence against women.

"The United Arab Emirates and Dubai is a rapidly changing society. This decision won't only affect Marte Dalelv, who can travel home now if she wishes to, but also serve as a wake-up call regarding the legal situation in many other countries," Barth Eide was quoted as saying.

Norway's Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg wrote on Twitter: "Happy that Marte has been pardoned and that she is a free woman again."
Dalelv said she planned to leave the UAE soon, but "first I have to thank some very special people," including local groups that supported her. She had been staying at a Norwegian-linked aid center.

The AP does not identify the names of alleged sexual assault victims, but Dalelv went public voluntarily to talk to media.
In an interview with the AP last week, she recalled that she fled to the hotel lobby and asked for the police to be called after the alleged attack. The hotel staff asked if she was sure she wanted to involve the police, Dalelv said.

"Of course I want to call the police," she said. "That is the natural reaction where I am from."

She said she was held in custody for four days before being able to reach her stepfather in Norway.

Norway's foreign minister said "very high level" Norwegian officials, including himself, had been in daily contact with counterparts in the United Arab Emirates since the verdict against Dalelv.

"We have made very clear what we think about this verdict and what we think about the fact that one is charged and sentenced when one starts out by reporting alleged abuse," Barth Eide said.

In London, a rights group monitoring UAE affairs urged authorities to change laws to "ensure victims are protected, feel comfortable reporting crimes and are able to fairly pursue justice."

"While we are pleased that Marte can now return home to Norway, her pardon still suggests that she was somehow guilty of a crime," said Rori Donaghy, a spokesman for the Emirates Center for Human Rights. "Until laws are reformed, victims of sexual violence in the UAE will continue to suffer in this way and we will likely see more cases such as this one."

http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_23707473/ ... eing-raped
What a deal !! :blink: Forget that you were raped and we'll forget that you had sex 'outside of marriage.' What ? How dare you say it was 'forced upon you,' you ungrateful wench ? Be glad you're not sitting in a jail cell for the next 16 months !

The guy accused of rape (and never tried for it) was from Sudan, a country where girls are lucky to escape genital mutilation.
Female genital mutilation: 30 million girls 'at risk'


FGM remains almost universal in Somalia, Guinea, Djibouti and Egypt and there was little discernible decline in Chad, Gambia, Mali, Senegal, Sudan or Yemen, the study found.
Oil money goes a long way in Arab lands

From this


To this



http://dailynewsdig.com/rich-tycoon-coa ... i-in-gold/

At the speed of light !!!

Apparently the concept of Islamic modesty does not apply to fancy toys for macho men to show off in. Geez, lordy lord !! Who would have guessed ?

Almost a hundred years ago, there seems to have been a concerted effort by the Jews at "Famous-Players-Lasky," (later to become Paramount, now owned by Viacom) to portray Islamic culture in a romantic light. Could it be because the Zionists needed Muslim co-operation for the establishment of Israel ? Nah!!

The Sheik is a 1921 American silent romantic drama film produced by Famous Players-Lasky, directed by George Melford and starring Rudolph Valentino, Agnes Ayres, and Adolphe Menjou. It was based on the bestselling romance novel of the same name by Edith Maude Hull and was adapted for the screen by Monte M. Katterjohn. The film was box office hit and helped propel Valentino to stardom

In September 1927, Famous Players-Lasky was reorganized under the name Paramount Famous Lasky Corporation, later becoming the Paramount Pictures Corporation (now a division of Viacom). [1] The Balaban and Katz Historical Foundation now owns the Famous Players trademark.




The Son of the Sheik was released nationwide on September 5, 1926, nearly two weeks after Valentino's death. The film was an instant hit with audiences and grossed $1,000,000 within the first year of its release.

The Sheik became so popular that the word came to be used to mean a young man on the prowl. The object of a Sheik's desire was dubbed "a Sheba."[7]

The Sheik became widely copied over the years. Burning Sands, Tents of Allah, Felix the Cat Shatters the Sheik, and Rex Ingram's The Arab, which starred Ramón Novarro. The Shriek of Araby, and a Baby Peggy short Peg o' Movies spoofed the film. The title of the Oswald the Lucky Rabbit cartoon The Shriek (1933) is a parody of The Sheik.[17] Much later, Elvis Presley's film Harum Scarum drew from The Sheik as well.[7]

"The Sheik of Araby" is a song that was written by Harry B. Smith, Francis Wheeler and music by Ted Snyder in 1921. It was composed in response to the popularity of the Rudolph Valentino film The Sheik. In 1926 it received new lyrics written by Billy Rose and was retitled "That Night in Araby."

It was a Tin Pan Alley hit, and was also adopted by early jazz bands, especially in New Orleans, making it a jazz standard. It was a well recognized part of popular culture, earning a mention in The Great Gatsby. In 1926, Fleischer Studios released a cartoon with this song, recorded in Phonofilm, as part of their Song Car-Tunes series, and a live action short with this title was filmed in Phonofilm in the UK, directed by Miles Mander.

The Beatles covered this song in 1962 at their unsuccessful Decca audition with George Harrison as lead singer and Pete Best on drums. This track can be found on Anthology 1.

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zbFBhO8WBk

Chapter one of Art Spiegelman's graphic novel Maus is called "The Sheik", and contains a number of references to Valentino and his most famous film.

The Sheik is the official mascot of Hollywood High School, and the athletic teams and student body are known as the Sheiks, the name drawn from this movie.

The Sheik commands his new captive to obey him
Of course, in order for the interracial, cross-cultural taboo of the period to be broken, it had to be revealed in the story that it really wasn't a taboo, after all:
Raoul tends to him and tells Diana he has a chance. She sits and holds the Sheik's hand. When she remarks that his hand is big for an Arab, Raoul reveals that the Sheik is not one. His father was British and his mother Spanish. They died in the desert, and their child was rescued and raised by the old Sheik. When the old man died, Ahmed returned to rule the tribe. When Ahmed wakes up, Diana confesses her love.


Rudolf Valentino and Natacha Rambova

Both Rambova and Valentino were Spiritualists. She had been interested in ancient religions since her teen years. She believed in reincarnation and psychic powers. Later in life she became an Egyptologist, an author on astrology, and a follower of Madame Blavatsky and George Gurdjieff.[46]

Hoffman’s Comment to Professor Kevin McDonald

The pursuit of racial purity or racial geo-political (“blood and soil”) policies, when divorced from truth and justice, is an accessory to evil. It is no mystery that Right-wing nationalists like Prof. MacDonald view Islam as far more deadly to the West than Judaism. Though he claims to markedly differ with the neocons, MacDonald’s views are consonant with theirs, at least in this respect, and no wonder: if you are any type of racist then you are already Talmudic, whether you know it or not. The Babylonian Talmud is a fount of racism. What is this writer’s definition of racism? Self-worship. It is the elevation of the carnal above ideals; the idolization of the corporeal, and the corrosion of the spiritual.

Kevin MacDonald forgets or perhaps does not even know that Orthodox Judaism, the Judaism practiced by the Israeli Far Right, despises western civilization with an intense hatred. In Judaism, western civilization is secretly execrated as kochi ve’otzem yadi (cf. Judaism Discovered, pp. 932-939).

Who was it that lobbied in the 1970s, 80s and 90s for Muslims to enter Britain and Europe? Numerous Zionist organizations and media were behind this effort. Who aided the Muslim armies with intelligence and through internal subversion of western nations in places like Spain in the fifteenth century? Judaism and Islam were united for hundreds of years. The medieval Catholic Church was at war with both. It is short-sighted in the extreme to view the current Muslim presence in Europe as a circumstance that can be ameliorated by a western alliance with the Christ-hating Talmudic butchers in the Israeli settlements and the Likud and Shas parties.

—Michael Hoffman

Hoffman is the author of Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit (Independent History and Research, 2008)

http://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2 ... chive.html
Modern Turkey: a secret Zionist state controlled by the Dönmeh

http://thirteenthmonkey.blogspot.com/20 ... eh_08.html

The DONMEH part 2: House of Saud Connections

http://thirteenthmonkey.blogspot.com/20 ... tions.html



Article 82. The penalty for adultery in the following cases shall be death, regardless of the age or marital status of the culprit: (1) Adultery with one's consanguineous relatives (close blood relatives forbidden to each other by religious law); (2) Adultery with one's stepmother in which the adulterer's punishment shall be death; (3) Adultery between a non-Muslim man and a Muslim woman, in which case the adulterer (non-Muslim man) shall receive the death penalty; (4) Forcible rape, in which case the rapist shall receive the death penalty.

Article 83. Adultery in the following cases shall be punishable by stoning: (1) Adultery by a married man who is wedded to a permanent wife with whom he has had intercourse and may have intercourse when he so desires; (2) Adultery of a married woman with an adult man provided the woman is permanently married and has had intercourse with her husband and is able to do so again.

Note. Adultery of a married woman with a minor is punishable by flogging.

Article 84. Old married adulterers and adulteresses shall be flogged before being stoned.

Article 85. Revocable divorce shall not relieve the husband or wife from the bond of marriage during the waiting period whereas irrevocable divorce shall do so.

Article 86. Adultery of a permanently married man or a permanently married woman who does not have access to his or her spouse, due to travel, incarceration or similar impediments, shall not require stoning.

Article 88. The punishment for an unmarried adulterer or adulteress shall be one hundred lashes.

Article 90. If a man or a woman has committed the act of adultery several times and has been punished after each act, he or she shall be put to death following his or her fourth act of adultery.

Article 91. An adulteress shall not be punished while pregnant or in menstruation or when, following birth and in the absence of a guardian, the newborn's life is in danger. If, however, the newborn becomes the ward of a guardian the punishment shall be carried out.

Article 92. If the flogging of a pregnant woman or a woman nursing her child poses risks to the unborn or to the child respectively, the execution of the punishment shall be delayed until the said risk is no longer present.

Article 93. If an ailing woman or a woman in menstruation has been condemned to death or stoning, the punishment shall be carried out. If, however, she is condemned to flogging, the punishment shall be delayed until she is recovered or her menstruation period is over.

Article 100. The flogging of an adulterer shall be carried out while he is standing upright and his body bare except for his genitals. The lashes shall strike all parts of his body–- except his face, head and genitals-- with full force. The adulteress shall be flogged while she is seated and her clothing tightly bound to her body.

Article 102. The stoning of an adulterer or adulteress shall be carried out while each is placed in a hole and covered with soil, he up to his waist and she up to a line above her breasts.

Article 119. Testimony of women alone or in conjunction with that of a single man shall not prove sodomy.

Article 127. Lesbianism consists in genital sexual acts carried out between women.

Article 128. Evidence for proof of lesbianism and sodomy is the same.

Article 129. The punishment for lesbianism is a hundred lashes for both parties to the act.

Article 130. Punishment for lesbianism applies only to the person who is of age, sane, in control of her actions and who has been a willing party to the act of lesbianism.

Note. In the application of the penalty for lesbianism there shall be no distinction as to whether the culprit has been passive or active or as to whether she is a Muslim or non-Muslim.

Article 131. If the act of lesbianism has been repeated three times and punishment has been carried out each time, the death penalty shall apply if the act is committed a fourth time.

Article 132. If the perpetrator of the act of lesbianism repents prior to the testimony of witnesses, the penalty of hadd shall not apply. Repentance following the witnesses' testimony, however, shall not bar hadd punishment.

Article 133. If the act of lesbianism is proved through confession and the culprit repents afterwards, the judge may ask the supreme jurist (vali-ye amr) for waiver of punishment.

Article 134. If two women, who are not consanguineous, go under the same bed cover while nude and without justification, they shall be given fewer than one hundred lashes. In case of repetition of the act for a third time each shall be given one hundred lashes.

Article 138. The penalty for procurement is in the case of a male procurer 75 lashes and banishment between three months and a year and in the case of a female procurer only 75 lashes.

Article 140. The penalty for false accusation is 80 lashes regardless of the gender of the culprit.

Article 145. Any insult that causes indignation to the victim but which does not constitute false accusation of adultery or male homosexuality, such as when a husband tells his wife: 'You were not a virgin,' is punishable by up to 74 lashes.

US Has Given Over $100 BILLION To Companies Defying Its Policy On Iran

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/0 ... 88787.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/07/world ... c=rss&_r=0
 This from wikipedia:

“Iranians were immune to the racial Nuremberg Laws on the grounds that they were pure blooded Aryans. In 1939, Nazi (Notsee :P Don't see fools !) Germany provided Iran with what they called a Germany Scientific Library. The library contained over 7500 books selected “to convince Iranian readers … of the kinship between the National Socialist Reich and the Aryan culture of Iran”(Lenczowski. 1944, p. 161).


“From 1939 to 1941 Iran’s top foreign trade partner (nearly 50% of its total trade) was Germany, which helped Iran open modern sea and air communications with the rest of the world.[10]”

Hassan Esfandiary, and Mussa Nuri Esfandiari Iranian ambassador to the German Reich meeting Adolf Hitler

In 1941, the Allies forced Reza Shah to abdicate the throne to his son, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. His pro-Nazi followers in the Iranian government such as Fazlollah Zahedi [11] and Mohammad Hosein Airom shared similar fates. The British believed that Zahedi was planning a general uprising in cooperation with German forces. He was arrested, where he was found with German weapons and correspondence from a German agent. He was interned in Palestine.”

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... Palace.JPG

Signed Photograph of Adolf Hitler for Reza Shah Pahlavi (pro-Hitler father of Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi) in Original Frame with the Swastika and Adolf Hitler’s (AH) Sign – Sahebgharanie Palace – Niavaran Palace Complex. The text below the photograph: His Imperial Majesty – Reza Shah Pahlavi – Shahanshah of Iran – With Best Wishes – Berlin March 12, 1936 – The signature of Adolf Hitler
Iranian university students in the 1970's

Old Tehran: 1960s and 1970s

http://www.kavehfarrokh.com/iranica/pic ... 0s-part-i/

Miss Iran 1967

Quotes from the "CIA puppet" Shah installed in the 1953 coup:

"A crown, a throne could not be based on the not too very solid foundation of blood.

Who are they to try me? They should be tried first. [They are] people who are rejecting the United Nations resolutions, who are rejecting the Hague Court resolution, who are rejecting the world public opinion, who have no respect for any international law, and who are massacring people, executing people, just imprisoning thousands and thousands and thousands without any reasons. Who is going to try them?

It's always a tendency to compare our country in my time to the most perfect democracies of the world. I don't mind that. But now, what we hear is "oh let's try to understand these people, after all, Islam is something special" when what they are doing is absolutely contrary to Islam. Now, everybody is trying to say "well, let's try to understand these people", these people who are killing, massacring others, the people they don't like just like flies. But in my case it is to compare it to the most perfect government of the world.

You think that Mr Khomeini, [an] uneducated person ... could have planned all this? Masterminded all this, set up all the organization? I know that one man alone could not have done it ... I know that a tremendous amount of money was spent ... I know that top experts in propaganda were used to show us like tyrants and monsters, and the other side as democratic liberal revolutionaries who want to save the country."
~David Frost (January 1980), The Shah Speaks (video)

"Nixon has the audacity to tell me to do nothing in the interest of my country until he dictates where that interest lies. At the same time he threatens me that failure to follow his so-called advice will be to jeopardize the special relations between our two countries. I say to hell with such special relations. " --As quoted in Asadollah Alam (1991), The Shah and I: The Confidential Diary of Iran's Royal Court, 1968-77, page 278

"We were wrong to believe that the British are our friends. You are obsessed solely with your own selfish interests and treat us as a people beyond the pale. But your attitude is a matter of profound disinterest. Your democratic system has already erupted into chaos. We shall soon overtake you and in a decade you will be struggling in our wake. Perhaps then you will remember how you treated us." ~ As quoted in Asadollah Alam (1991), The Shah and I: The Confidential Diary of Iran's Royal Court, 1968-77, page 236

From "The Shah's Story (1980)"

"I cannot avoid wondering about the feelings of those who are now the apparent rulers of Iran. They are, despite their mistakes and the crimes which they have instigated, men of faith who claim to be sent by God. I hope they will eventually realize that the revolution which they believe they have brought about is not to the glory of God, but serves the forces of evil." Page 167

"At no time during my reign were there more than 3,164 so-called political prisoners, most of whom were terrorists. Since February, it is certain that tens of thousands of men and women have been arrested and imprisoned under frequently inhumane conditions." Page 198-199

"It is a fact that throughout my reign, representatives of the Red Cross were allowed to visit the kingdom's prisons at liberty. Our penitentiaries were open to all official investigators. Every prisoner's lawyer knew the details of the charges against his client, and had time in which to prepare his defence and find the necessary witnesses. Finally, a condemned man had the right of appeal, after which I often excercised my right of pardon. It is no longer like this. The so-called "Islamic tribunals" are an insult to the elevated principles of the Koran." Page 199

"The consequences of the Ayatollah's blood-thirsty fiasco could be disastrous for the whole of Islam and particularly for Shiism. The systematic destruction, in the name of religion, of a state and a society which vigilantly safeguarded the peace, could have effects in this part of the world which would be disastrous for sincere believers of the Koran, and even for those who believe less wholeheartedly. The murderous megalomania and the agitation of Qom, combined with the miserable dictatorship of a handful of mollahs, are, I insist, all in direct contradiction with the essential principles of Islam." Page 207

"I envisaged future generations of Iranians proudly taking their rightful place among the vast family of nations, and fulfilling their responsibilities with dignity. I hoped to see dispelled for ever the medieval shadows from which Iran had emerged only half a century ago, and that the light which is the very essence of Iranian civilization and culture would prevail. Throughout my reign, I lived only for the realization of this dream which was beginning to become reality.

It will be seen that I worked tirelessly and keenly to this end. I had ceaselessly to struggle against all sorts of obstacles and difficulties. I had to confront innumerable plots and intrigues both inside the country and abroad. I combated the all-powerful, multi-national trusts and cartels when all my advisers warned me against such challenges. I may have made mistakes, of course, but this long battle was not one of them." Page 11

"I wanted to build up Iran while we still had oil and thus to guarantee the life of the country after our oil reserves were exhausted. Therein lay the solution. We had to move fast, we had no time to spare. Finally, it is unquestionable that the oil lobby contributed actively to my downfall." Page 201


Iran faces up to its most lethal threat - drugs

One in 17 people are addicted,

Iran has the highest rate of heroin and opium addiction per head of population in the world, according to the UN: one in 17 is a regular user and 20% of the Iranian population aged 15-60 is involved in drug abuse

There are an estimated 500,000 drug dealers in Iran, circulating narcotics with an estimated street value of £1.7bn to £2.83bn
Drug abuse is the main factor behind 60% of divorces in Iran, according to a survey

Official government figures estimate that illegal drugs cost the Iranian economy £630m in 2004

More than 3,200 Iranian law enforcers have been killed in clashes with drug traffickers since 1979. In 2003, officers seized 220 tonnes of drugs, up 54% on the previous year.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/oc ... roberttait

The Iranian inflation rate has always been in double digits and sometimes as high as 25%




Inflation Is Theft

by Hans F. Sennholz

Many people know how to earn money, but few are aware of what the Federal Reserve System, acting on behalf of the U.S. Government, is doing to their money. It is inflating and depreciating the dollar at various rates – at double-digit rates during the 1970s and early 80s and at single-digit rates ever since. The present dollar is worth no more than 10 cents of the 1970 dollar and 50 cents of the 1980 dollar.

Legal organ sales in Islamic Iran / بدن فروشی مردان و زنان ایران

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgh0jiMu_UM

It's not enough that they have to sell their internal organs for a measly 500 to a thousand dollars just to pay off debts and survive but they actually often have to wait up to four months just to get even that amount !!

9-11 plane-hugging RBN host Michael Collins Piper of American Free Press visits the big 'hero' of the anti-Zio troofers Monsieur Armordinnerjacket in Iran during the now legendary holycost conference :P

Isn't it odd how things have changed ? ;)

Posts: 5061
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:24 pm

Re: When Ethnicities/Races/Cultures Collide

Unread post by hoi.polloi » Mon Jul 29, 2013 1:23 pm

It's not really clear what you are trying to say in your Iran post besides "Jewish power is behind Arab power" (kinda ... awkward allegation), but the post before on political correctness is full of a lot of bullshit.
The parallels between the old, economic Marxism and cultural Marxism are evident. Cultural Marxism, or Political Correctness, shares with classical Marxism the vision of a "classless society," i.e., a society not merely of equal opportunity, but equal condition.
That isn't so. Actually, Marxism has its own class system based on how effectively one is being "equal", which is very much like the Animal Farm pigs who are more equal than others.
Since that vision contradicts human nature
In what way does something implemented by humans contradict human nature? Are you happy with this author's allegation that hate, prejudice, death, torture, murder and war contradict human nature?

- because people are different, they end up unequal, regardless of the starting point -
Or they end up equal regardless of starting point. So what's the point of this statement?

society will not accord with it unless forced.
What is accorded by society that is not the result of a contention of forces?

So, under both variants of Marxism, it is forced.
Again, moot.

This is the first major parallel between classical and cultural Marxism: both are totalitarian ideologies. The totalitarian nature of Political Correctness can be seen on campuses where "PC" has taken over the college: freedom of speech, of the press, and even of thought are all eliminated.
This must be pretty rhetorical. The attempt to create a place where new thoughts can be expressed can only be seen as the opposite of what has traditionally been a definition of totalitarianism. It's like the pot calling the kettle black. The donkey saying the rabbit has long ears.

The second major parallel is that both classical, economic Marxism and cultural Marxism have single-factor explanations of history. Classical Marxism argues that all of history was determined by ownership of the means of production. Cultural Marxism says that history is wholly explained by which groups - defined by sex, race, and sexual normality or abnormality - have power over which other groups.
Also a bit misguided. It aims to retroactively classify any attention on the power dynamic of human civilizations as "Marxism". By this definition, it leaves the insane author (who thinks the 1950's was an ideal time compared to now - see "Golden Age Syndrome") would be the result of anybody having a look at history and trying to sort out who has been more powerful and who more weak — a pastime of countless cultures around the world since forever. Is it Marxist then to watch sports and care about the outcome? This argument is precarious and ridonkulous.
The third parallel is that both varieties of Marxism declare certain groups virtuous and others evil a priori, that is, without regard for the actual behavior of individuals.
Every drama creates a villain, for goodness' sakes. What do you expect? The "villain" on our board is people who can't seem to wrap their heads around the concept of approaching free egalitarianist information for all who will hear about the power dynamic caused by technology. And doing so without sounding alarms against a single culprit like a Blank Panther, KKK or other hate group leader.

Classical Marxism defines workers and peasants as virtuous and the bourgeoisie (the middle class) and other owners of capital as evil. Cultural Marxism defines blacks, Hispanics, Feminist women, homosexuals and some additional minority groups as virtuous and white men as evil. (Cultural Marxism does not recognize the existence of non-Feminist women, and defines blacks who reject Political Correctness as whites).
I don't know what kind of Marxism this is he's going on about but it's nothing like any socialist I've ever talked to. It does, however, sound a lot like racism.

Since you yourself are a raving racist with very little cultural sensitivity, your whole post of this article stinks of trying to say the failures of idealists to create a better world are what makes idealism stupid. Whereas you are the one mixing your criticisms of the system with a terrible zeal for the flower pot out of which are present problems arose. Your demons are imaginary. Please stop trying to justify your hate and bigotry and saying people taking offense at your bigotry is somehow you being victimized. That's sincerely twisted and psycho.

Fess up. You have so far blamed Africans for slavery, blamed Jews for everything and blamed Arabs for being Arabic and insisted that it's all terrible. And nowhere has there been a clear point. Do you just really hate a lot of people? What are you doing? Really?

Post Reply