All changes in solar declination are the result of a corresponding orbital motion.
No, this is NA$A's claim.
All changes in orbital motion result in a corresponding change in the solar declination.
Again, this is NA$A's claim.
What you obviously are trying to say is that the decimal places missing from the calculator do not show you the fraction of a degree difference there is in the formula.
They round off the number to the nearest hundredth of a degree, which is your only basis for claiming the degree doesn't change, you blowhard, playing-dumb, fake moron.
The change in solar declination SHOULD move like the hand of a watch – smoothly and continuously IF the heliocentric model were correct. It is not.
You're setting up a bogus condition (A):
the Sun should behave like a watch. (No, it should behave like the Sun.)
And then setting up a bogus definition of that condition (B):
a watch moves smoothly. (No, watches have jerky, halty motions.)
Then you claim the heliocentric model is true only under the condition that the bogus condition A and definition B are indeed bogus.
Which means you are actually claiming that heliocentricity is correct. Because your false statements
are false.
Then you are claiming, independently of both of your conditions, that the heliocentric model is false.
Essentially, you have just declared that heliocentricity is correct and the proof that it's false ... is that it's false.
And you have done so very poorly.
So there is indeed an enormous problem with both your presentation
and your logic.
---
Instead of pointing out the numerous problems with a spinning Earth model, you use circular logic to make anyone
questioning the spinning Earth model sound like a nutcase. You make twisted Lewis Caroll-ish logic statements backhandedly supporting NA$A (
they are wrong, unless false things are false) and construct damnations upon your house of cards.
But you haven't actually disproven the math of the solar declination, nor questioned any of NA$A's claims. You have merely hoped to catch us peering into your lack of comprehension, snagging us on some idiotic thing you hoped we would imagine because of your ass-lickingly pompous speech, and then have your NA$A pals play 'gotcha' on the idiocy you set up as useless bait.
The only thing you have proven useful for on this forum is showing everyone just how far NA$A is willing to go to pay shills for keyboard mashing attempts to derail serious investigation into their fraud. Good bye. Good riddance.
