beyondafringe wrote:Aw Schnookums,
or Idschmyd, for fear of confusing you, while perhaps your blood-sugar levels are not what they should be.
I must say that upon your kind advice to review your posts of the previous page, your actual perspective remains elusive to me.
And it was, and is, just you that I have this lack of clarity in regard to, I was trying to be genteel when giving you some company in the fog.
In one line you talk about staging, CGI, false/fake statements by non-witnesses; these are all things I would associate with someone who, like I, doubts the actual occurrence of any event beyond the required blocking of roads/all access to the areas that the activity will later be said to have taken place in.
Then you reference the 'Hamza' character with something akin to vitriol, as if some personal grievance can exist toward a thing.
When I inquire as to the origin of the Bond Baddie tag, you responded with a link to a story of the possible future director of a Bond film, and an abstract mention of the Batman........?
Your treatment of the J.France 'witness' seems to also suggest some linking together of persons from different geographical areas in a way that requires actual flesh-and-blood people, with feelings and opinions all their own, being spurred into actions (that I do not accept happened) in response to other actions (which I also do not accept as having happened, in this case the French military escapades in Mali, and I suspect this may be where the 'problem' lies) and express surprise at an age that could just as easily be made anything, if you are of the opinion that the age referenced character is not real.
As I said, your fundamental position was something I sought to clarify, and the one really relevant or interesting possible point still goes unanswered - did the J.France character/statement surface before, or after, the French soldier stabbing story did?
I will of course check now myself, so do not trouble yourself with replying, may I suggest a chocolate biscuit, and a sugary drink, might help restore equilibrium.
And on the subject of my gene pool eradication, the only programs of such nature of which I know have sought to eradicate the lower ranks of intellect, keeping of course sufficient numbers to bear the more mundane and less mentally taxing labors.
Tell me, if eugenics regains popularity, who do you think will be banging mud from their boots, if you survive at all?
ADMIN NOTICE : Jason, it was Pug, not Idschmyd, who responded with 'the possible future director of a Bond film' link. So may I advise you to stop typing while looking up other members' posts. Also, I would not recommend that you slit your wrists - but please use it for less onanistic ramblings and spare us from your tedious opinions of this forum's members. Generally speaking, calm down - if you see what I mean.
Yes, this is red type - and is to be considered as a warning, the kind of which I rarely issue twice.