kickstones wrote: ↑
Sat Oct 17, 2020 9:22 am
However, a few members on Cluesforum have questioned the integrity of the guy, which they have every right to do. Yes, he may well turn out to be controlled opposition, but I think the main point of the video whether he is controlled opposition or not is that it is bringing awareness of the scam / fraud to many more people who maybe had not read this thread…
…Which is huge exposure worldwide in a two week period of time. And it surprises me that YouTube have not censored this video. Maybe they are afraid of a lawsuit by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich against freedom of speech denial, or withholding evidence to the public of the fraud. Or maybe he is actually controlled opposition and they are leaving it up for some reason, which at this moment of time I cannot see how it would benefit them.
If anyone „may well turn out to be controlled opposition,” I think that that is just the first thing we have to deal with. Social actions are there never for “let’s trust them and then we'll see,” are they?
What Mr. / Herr Fuellmich proposes at the end of his (longer) video, IMO, is firstly nonsensical (suing the government? and that en masse? - but let the experts decide), secondly it is morally outrageous. Everybody has suffered material/financial damages. If there is any reality behind the proposal or advice, obviously it is the vigilant rascals that will take it, if there is any need to stimulate/inform them at all. (If the perps/psychopats should not be considered human, - as CluedIn says, - this kind of discrimination applies to me to almost all types of traders and businessmen.)
Is it not outrageous and highly arrogant to try to gain (or “regain” or get “compensation”) in a situation where the vast majority of people will obviously remain damaged? That might seem logical step or reaction only to a lawyer, some kind of lawyers or legal experts.
I think the gentleman says only two things that one can agree with, - provided not sharing his worry about democracy: 1. mortality rates are stabile and normal everywhere, and 2. the PCR test has no relevance beyond laboratory world. These, however, these two are known by now just by everybody! So much so that a slight doubt can almost be felt at least as regards the first…
Even in my very local era/language, there are countless “sources” which are absolutely clear as regards these two points. But of course they are always mixing materials in between – (that “materials" could summarily be named “sensational” - to avoid the word “conspiratorial”). I even heard someone to say that these latter are only just honey on their presentation for better consumption, - “the end justifies the means” as we know it does very much.
There are always certain moral advances to be gained by rebutting lies and falsenesses. But this superiority vanishes instantly when launching into positive (and seemingly genuine) statements.
Let me ask, please, once more: if there were/are really serious illnesses - real damages in peoples’ health caused by the present circus - directly, or indirectly by negligence and by “psychic factors” because of the heightened stresses etc, - shouldn’t that have already showed up in the mortality rate?
I grant, maybe I am a ruthless and callous being… because I could never have get myself to buy any of the (alternative) news items reporting about people allegedly suffering so much because of the new measures. But did people suffer before December last year so much less than at present that they now began vigorously claim (allegedly) that good old state of affairs back as their normal nay legitimate way of life? Isn’t that claim familiar to us – from the “conspiracy literature?!”