Engineering Racism

Anything on the news and elsewhere in the media with evidence of digital manipulation, bogus story-lines and propaganda
simonshack
Administrator
Posts: 7341
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy
Contact:

Re: Engineering Racism

Unread post by simonshack »

*

"WHAT IS TRULY SCANDINAVIAN? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING."

A new commercial by SAS (the Scandinavian Airlines System) has the world laughing (or weeping) at the utter crassness of the globalists' agenda:


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShfsBPrNcTI

I have no words. Only :puke:

Needless to say, anyone puking at that commercial is either a "racist", a "white supremacist" or a "right-wing nationalist" - or all three combined... :rolleyes:


And at 0:21 in the video, we have...
Image
patrix
Member
Posts: 712
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 10:24 am

Re: Engineering Racism

Unread post by patrix »

Yes Dear Simon, they're revving up the Kalergi plan in Europe.

https://archive.org/details/28Aug2017Th ... e/mode/2up

The goal seems to be to weaken European ethnic groups physically and mentally through cultural engineering, vaccines and bad medicine/nutrition. Deprive them of their homelands and destroy their social systems and economies through mass migration.

And the Noahid laws and the Messianic age https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messianic_Age is moving closer thanks to Donald Trump:
https://www.brighteon.com/6001144192001 ... PtQFgL90vE

Edit: Holy c... Look at the bottom of the Wickedpedia on the Messianic age.
The technological singularity - a hypothetical event that is sometimes likened to the advent of the messiah, with an artificial superintelligence playing the role of the messiah
Is this perhaps the plan? Messiah will be a computer that rules man kind controlled by you know who?
The concept and the term "singularity" were popularized by Vernor Vinge in his 1993 essay The Coming Technological Singularity, in which he wrote that it would signal the end of the human era, as the new superintelligence would continue to upgrade itself and would advance technologically at an incomprehensible rate. He wrote that he would be surprised if it occurred before 2005 or after 2030.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technol ... ingularity
thisisunreal
Member
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2016 10:20 am

Re: Engineering Racism

Unread post by thisisunreal »

Mansur wrote: Thu Nov 22, 2018 4:24 am
thisisunreal » November 19th, 2018, 4:17 pm wrote:Dear Mansur, allow me to respond to a couple of your quotes with my humble opinion, if i may, which I found very interesting.
Perhaps he was not a "hoax-minded” person, meaning not being aware of the possibility of being used.
Tony Martin seems completely unaware of the wider possibilities of censorship... etc.
Sorry, thisisunreal, but you don’t seem to have found the thought of “being used” interesting at all.

Let me say (or remind you) that all their (the above four’s and of course all the others’) persecution stories are there purely to believe in.

I would say that some private experience (or firsthand knowledge) could form even barriers in these matters, the imagination becoming more sensitive and more responsive to suggestions than "normally"...

Anyway. But let me ask: What could you think more effectively enhance the "spiritual/religious" character of the holocaust than -- a Finkelstein, his holy war against bankers, in the name of the sacred issue, the unification of the new age Jewry? (Both Irving and Finkelstein can be said "with confidence" being mainstream.)

In these levels there is only one kind of opposition i.e. controlled. Imho.
Dear Mansur, thank you for your characteristic reply. Would you mind clarifying your point somewhat?

What I was trying to say is that I believe in (and I use the words cautiously) Tony Martin, but to a far greater extent, I fully believe in the presentation of the story of the life of Professor Norman Finklestein. I believe in this because there is a scholarly body of work, a personal personna and allegiances in his personal / professional lives that help to support the reality of his being.

Now, I say, "I believe" with caution, as always. CluesForum has taught me this much!

I would be curious to clarify whether or not you are saying that Professor Norman Finklestein is genuine or not!

Now you use the phrase, 'controlled opposition' and I think this is a sticking point for me. Do you mean that he (Prof. Norman Finklestein) is controlled opposition in that he is a paid agent or somebody unknown to themselves being kept in play? The difference is huge! For example, if you mean the latter, then we could claim that a good deal of CluesForum members are controlled opposition because their views are given a semblance of airing! However, the devil is in the detail.

Professor Normal Finklestein is a grass roots activist who has gone further than anybody to call out the sneaky serruptititious behaviour of the Jewish / Zionist clan or their behaviour! Has he gone the full nine yards? No! Why is this? Is the answer a) he is a paid agent? b) he is psycholigcally held back from going the full nine yards? c) He is professionally and personally aware of the grave professional danger you place yourself in if indeed you do go the whole nine yards or d) He is fully in the know and is a coward?

Allow me this muse if you will, 'in a sense, we are all controlled opposition because we clearly lack the full facts. When somebody lacks the full facts, it is easy to direct them'! Perhaps that is what we are here! Whilst we have more facts due to the exacting analysis of imagery, perhaps we are controlled opposition through the nature of our controllable clicks'? Perhaps we are controlled because of the limited nature of our audience? Saying somebody is controlled opposition kind of rolls of the tongue, but I wanted a little more detail.

CluesForum members don't have the full facts, but do benefit from understanding the story in a more holistic way!

My personal belief is that he is controlled opposition (not in the way you intimate) but through virtue of either psychological barrriers or a pragmatic notion of the powers that be and how they manifest themselves in every day reality. I believe that his career has been destroyed by his inability to censor himself and for that he desrves some credit. You can see his 'on spectrum' displays in interviews that he gives and have a childlike beauty. Further, he answers e-mails and those answers are consistent in tone to his short, terse, testy personna in real life.
To be fully unemployed in the US for ten years is quite an outcome and shows that he must have rattled somebody. This (if true) ought to be applauded as CluesForum is all about those who champion some sort of action, whatever that may be!

So, in your opinion, how would you characterise Prof Norman Finklestein? Dose he fit into one of the options above or is he somewhat different?

Your thoughts would be warmly appreciated
Mansur
Member
Posts: 210
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2018 9:22 pm

Re: Engineering Racism

Unread post by Mansur »

It is not quite clear why Finkelstein is so important to you. I can’t say more than what I said two years ago. I could only reapeat myself. Maybe only that I forgot then to mention: Finkelstein is an offspring of holo-survivors, and the holo-storyt is strengthened by every bit of his activity.

You say:
thisisunreal wrote: Mon Jun 28, 2021 9:52 am Now you use the phrase, 'controlled opposition' and I think this is a sticking point for me. Do you mean that he (Prof. Norman Finklestein) is controlled opposition in that he is a paid agent or somebody unknown to themselves being kept in play? The difference is huge!
The difference is huge for him - not for us. (That is a common 'dilemma' in the conspiracy language: 'he is / you're a gatekeeper - or a useful idiot - - or both.') I don't know much more about him, or at least I don’t remember anymore.

You emphasized the word ‘believe’: If Finkelstein is so important to you, then why not to follow his personal history, his professorship, and the like with a more critical eye, which every media item deserves -- and then maybe you could share it with us too? I’m not a great researcher, but - and if no one looks here at the moment, - let me whisper into your ear: for my part, I don’t believe in the integrity of any (official) holo researcher. If they had valid points (they had to have them!) that’s no reason for me to mention their names in a positive light. I sometimes really miss red flags waving.
Last edited by Mansur on Tue Jun 29, 2021 4:58 am, edited 3 times in total.
thisisunreal
Member
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2016 10:20 am

Re: Engineering Racism

Unread post by thisisunreal »

Mansur wrote: Tue Jun 29, 2021 12:32 am It is not quite clear why Finkelstein is so important to you. I can’t say more than what I said two years ago. I could only reapeat myself. Maybe only that I forgot then to mention: Finkelstein is an offspring of holo-survivors, and the holo-storyt is strengthened by every bit of his activity.

You say:
thisisunreal wrote: Mon Jun 28, 2021 9:52 am Now you use the phrase, 'controlled opposition' and I think this is a sticking point for me. Do you mean that he (Prof. Norman Finklestein) is controlled opposition in that he is a paid agent or somebody unknown to themselves being kept in play? The difference is huge!
The difference is huge for him - not for us. (That is a common 'dilemma' in the conspiracy language: 'he is / you're a gatekeeper - or a useful idiot - - or both.') I don't know much more about him, or at least I don’t remember anymore.

You emphasized the word ‘believe’: If Finkelstein is so important to you, then why not to follow his personal history, his professorship, and the like with a more critical eye, which every media item deserves -- and then maybe you could share it with us too? I’m not a great researcher, but - and if no one looks here at the moment, - let me whisper into your ear: for my part, I don’t believe in the integrity of any (official) holo researcher. If they had valid points (they had to have them!) that’s no reason for me to mention their names in a positive light. I sometimes really miss red flags waving.
Dear Mansur, thanks for the reply.

In response to this: "It is not quite clear why Finkelstein is so important to you".

He is imoprtant to me because as part of the CluesForum education, everybody remains under suspicion until proven otherwise, though sadly, this leads you to the realisation that most, nay, the vast majority of characters that are presented to us throug the lens of the crooked media are indeed crooked themselves (if indeed real at all to begin with)!

So, with that said, I try painstakingly hard to indetify 'real', authentic characters whose tales, narratives or stories are represented by history or actions. I was presented with Finklestein as I became interested in the Arab Israeli squeeze and I found him devestatingly interesting. I did (as you suggest) follow his authorship, life and professorship, along with his later demise and full unemployment for almost 10 years. He interests me because he himself is interesting, as sharp as they come and seemingly highly committed.

Now, when you labelled him as controlled opposition, I wondered about that for some considerable time. I wondered what it was that gave him away and so I asked you. I wondered how you could be so confident as to label him along with all others as controlled opposition when to me it was not so obvious.

Now, I do take your point that he does not go the whole nine yards (so to speak) but then who does? Who can? If his story is to be believed then you can see the very real dangers. He has been economically destroyed and societally destroyed and that is for venturing as far as he did with works like, 'The Holocaust Industry'.

Should we chastise him for failing to go further? Or was he merely play acting when he publically destroyed himself during the debate between Amy Goodman on Democracy now where he pilloried Prof. Alan Dershowitz for his fabricated book?

I honestly don't know the answer. It's not easy. If I were pushed I would say he is as genuine as a person can be! Finklestein isn't really a "holo researcher" to quote you. He is best known for his advocacy of Palestine, which he now considers a defeated nation as well as the Holocaust industry, in which he argues that the holocaust has been hijacked for a) an ongoing shakedown of the Swiss banks and b) an insulating device against any claims of poor behaviour on the part of Israel or the Jewish amalgamation / disaspora / group / etc. I think these insights and advocacy go far further than almost anybody else and the tell tale signs of his unacceptability are evident, in that his publi appearances have dwindled to almost nothing.

Is he holding back? To what extent is he holding back? These questions are so much harder to answer.

I guess the point I am making is that, sometimes, a blanket description of controlled opposition is perhaps not that useful or descriptive. The acid test is perhaps the lifetime work of somebody and there general direction. Jeremy Corbyn for me would be a good example of an authentic character, as honest as they come. However, in the same breath, when he was headhunted by the Jewish Lobby (plural) and felled, his career came to a rather sudden end. Did he ever mention their name or accuse them or point the finger

Not once and for me that isn't a weakness (nor controlled opposition). That is survival in the face of the most, perhaps the greatest concentration of power there has ever been.

Warmest regards and thanks again
Mansur
Member
Posts: 210
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2018 9:22 pm

Re: Engineering Racism

Unread post by Mansur »

Though I believe in your earnestness, your post are full of special pleading.

May I guess that your fanship to NF well antedates your 'taking the red pill'?


The 'holocaust' is a lie or, as a holo-specialist call it, a 'whole universe of lies', - thus, please, what 'hijack' are you (and NF) talking about?

And to maintain this lie with its quasi religious character is really an extremely lucrative business (actually much more than that). And such guys as NF (willy-nilly, who cares?) are extremely powerful means for that.

I would rather say that it is an operation - a long and elongated and still ongoing operation - rather than 'controlled opposition,' which is a rather outdated concept.

(I don’t think F’s financial situation at any times could have ever been comparable to that of an average American. -- [I remember outraged holo-believers causing $ 400,000 in damage to Zündel's house (another persecuted Jew). Maybe the figure is the insurer's confirmation. That was just the damage.]

As for his actual social and moral capital, I am quite sure that he has always been surrounded by an army of fans and understanding hearts. - May one refer again to an average American?)

The holocaust entry in his wiki:
On Holocaust denial

In a July 2020 online discussion with British activists, Finkelstein said David Irving "was a very good historian". Finding insufficient the evidence of Richard J. Evans as the expert witness in Irving's unsuccessful libel action in 2000 against Deborah Lipstadt, who had labeled Irving a Holocaust denier, Finkelstein said Irving had "produced works that are substantive…If you don’t like it, don’t read it. In the case of Irving, he knew a thing or two—or three". The Daily Telegraph in 2000 accused Finkelstein in The Holocaust Industry of defending Irving against Lipstadt, and, according to historian Tobias Abse, giving Irving qualified, secondhand praise.

In October 2020, Finkelstein published an extract from his forthcoming book, Cancel Culture, Academic Freedom and Me on his website following the banning of Holocaust denial from Facebook and Twitter. According to Finkelstein, "Holocaust denial should be taught in university and preferably by a Holocaust denier" as a means "to inoculate students" against it. He states: "If one is committed to the purity of truth, not just in its wholeness but also in its parts, then a Holocaust denier performs the useful function of ferreting out 'local' errors, precisely because he is a devil’s advocate—that is, fanatically committed to 'unmasking' the 'hoax of the 20th century.'"
You are free to read in it whatever you want - - and if so you are already in the 'rabbit hole.'
simonshack
Administrator
Posts: 7341
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy
Contact:

Re: Engineering Racism

Unread post by simonshack »

*

EXCUSE ME, BUT DO BLACK PRESIDENTS MATTER? OR NOT?


Wouldn't it make much more sense if these athletes kneeling down against racism would dedicate their gesture to REAL ASSASSINATIONS OF BLACK PEOPLE? (We all know by now that the alleged police-killing of "George Floyd" was an utter media hoax).


Image

In the last few months, we have seen the BLACK PRESIDENTS of 4 nations dying (or being viciously attacked) in mysterious ways. We also know that EACH ONE OF THEM had refused to play along with the ongoing "Covid plandemic" - and had kicked their W.H.O. representatives out of their respective nations.

Just imagine for a minute if, instead of these 4 black presidents, Boris Johnson, Angela Merkel, Emmanuel Macron and Joe Biden had been killed. Just imagine this for a minute, will you please? Thank you.

The whole question of "racism" is tainted with such massive and deep-rooted hypocrisy that I wouldn't even know where to start...
pov603
Member
Posts: 870
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 8:02 pm

Re: Engineering Racism

Unread post by pov603 »

I almost find it comical too that the very “incident” which has brought this (taking the knee at sport events) to the fore is the alleged death of George Floyd.
How did he die? One might ask.
By a “chauvinistic” police officer “taking the knee” on Mr Floyd’s neck. One might answer.
Typically these professional (EXTREMELY FIT) athletes are asked to take the knee, by the referee, in respect.
Whistle blows, athletes take the knee.
After 40secs athletes start looking towards ref.
Nearest player asks ref “how much longer ref?”.
Ref goes “oh, only about another nine minutes”.
Player goes “WHAT! I will blow my (insert muscle of choice) out staying in this position for that long and especially if 200lbs of the turf tries to fight back!”…
panertos
Member
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2023 9:39 pm

Re: Engineering Racism

Unread post by panertos »

I believe that the current concept of racism is deliberately shaped and engineered.

To engineer racism, the first step was to change the way we classify ourselves. This is fundamentally a framing issue. The media began to categorize people by skin colour, dividing them into "white" and "black" groups, departing from the previous practice of identifying by nationality.

For example, in crime reports, we now read about "black men" or "light-skinned men" (this is particularly common in Europe).

I believe that this shift in perspective stems from an internationalist viewpoint, which seeks to create identifiers that transcend national boundaries and foster a global movement. The message became "All black people unite" and "All white people are against you."

In a way, this is similar to the Bolshevik Revolution, when the Jews rallied the peasantry to kill the Russian Tsar and having the Jews take power, harming the peasantry in the end, all those worker statues don't improve the lives of the worker, it's propaganda.

Or like the French Revolution, where there was a lot of turmoil, but the lives of the peasants did not improve. Similarly, the lives of black people did not improve after 1960. In fact, they got worse. Ask any older black man in South Africa if life was better in 1980 or today, and they will tell you that life was better in 1980. Try this yourself if you ever go on vacation there.

https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?c ... r_end=2019
Image

The explicit emphasis on "white people" and "black people" only gained prominence in the 1980s, after a brief period of attention in the 1960s.
Google Ngrams graph showing the increasing use of the terms "white people" and "black people" over time

In my view, this tactic aligns with the divide-and-conquer strategy in politics. By directing the attention of white people towards black people and vice versa, a sense of distrust has been artfully cultivated.

It is only after extensive media campaigns that this concept has taken root. While I personally never paid much attention to it, the propaganda encouraging us to view the world through a racial lens is so pervasive that I, too, find myself unconsciously adopting this perspective.

The "George Floyd" case is a prime example of an event that was driven by racial narratives.

Racism serves the interests of those in power because it strips away identity, ideals, religion, and faith, leaving behind a hollow shell into which they can mold a new persona.


The push towards racial categorization is evident in the Ngram data, as we increasingly think in terms of black and white, losing our previous local distinctions. In my own country, I identified with a specific regional group or culture within a 500 km² area, known for our culture, build, language, but in this "new world," I am simply categorized as "white."

In a globalized context, uniform propaganda is needed, with the same message reverberating worldwide. The promotion of George Floyd's case is an example of this global narrative. I believe that these simplifications aid those in power in their efforts to shape a monolithic society.

For this reason, I also believe that it is essential for all puppet states within the US empire to have black migrants. Without such diversity, the universal propaganda about racism and slavery loses its impact. It doesn't hit home.

The globalist idea, only works on universal problems, universal dreams, universal rights, universal racism (white vs black).

There is no room for local realities, if a gang of Nigerian migrants in a city are committing crime, they can not be called out, as that goes against the universal principle of white on black racism.

It's a weird propaganda reality we live in.

Our world is quite normal, what we see and do and feel, but the propaganda narratives have nothing to do with my own observations. It doesn't even get close.

And this surprises me, you would say there is a gravitational force to the truth we see with our own eyes.

Image

Or maybe it's not so weird, if you see we take on average 100 hours of propaganda to us per week. Add 56 hours hours of sleep.

And then we have 12 hours left to give our mind some rest and think for ourselves or play a board game with some friends.
Post Reply