7/7

[antipodean]

That Daily Mail article is really bizarre.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... quiry.html

Central to the puzzle is which train the four Muslims caught from Luton to London on the morning of the bomb blasts - bearing in mind that the three separate Tube explosions at Edgware Road, Aldgate and King's Cross occurred together at exactly 8.50am,

there was a mock terrorist exercise going on in London that day. This was revealed by the organiser and former Scotland Yard officer Peter Power on BBC Radio 5 in the early evening after the atrocity.
He said: 'At half-past nine this morning we were running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up

How could Power have been running a mock exercise 40 minutes after the bomb blasts, & well after the tube stations would have been shut down.

No wonder he refuses to say who the company was.

So if he is unable to get access to the Stations, what exactly were Visor doing? Supplying a few extras, like the walking wounded & a few heroic eye witnesses, to provide fodder for the news crews.
At least this time we were spared the all knowing eye witness, wearing a Harley T shirt.

[timothymurphy]

After I asked for clarification they changed their minds and said it wasn't a "reconstruction"...

:o ....Uh....What did they say precisely?

They said:

From: Channel4 VE Support ([email protected])
Sent: May 24, 2010 10:50:38 AM
To: tim murphy

Dear Mr Murphy,
Thank you for contacting Channel 4 Viewer Enquiries. We would advise that the footage has been checked by our department head and the woman featured is not the actress Sally Phillips. This is actual footage from the day of the bombings. Thank you again for taking the time to contact us here at Channel 4 and foryour interest in our programming.

Regards,
Rachel Salinger
Channel 4 Viewer Enquiries

It's interesting that Ryan says it's a reconstruction.
But it could be explained as Ryan simply being confused and not knowing what he was talking about.
(He is a complaints guy rather than a proper TV guy, I suppose).

He could have been innocently confused :
My original complaint included a link to the video of the Sally Phillips clip being used within the "RIchard & Judy show" on Channel 4.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Q4FH5ICCpk

The Sally Phillips clip is used as if it were a reconstruction.
- confusing both for viewers and for TV people too, evidently.

I had made absolutely no reference to "reconstructions" in my e mail to Ryan though.

This e mail to Amy Lawson, Publicity Manager at Channel 4 News has yet to be answered...

london bombings news footage?
From: tim murphy
Sent: May 28, 2010 1:45:03 AM
To: [email protected]

Dear Ms Lawson,

I wrote to channel 4 feedback, to ask for an explanation of the contrived 7 July 2005 news footage which features actress Sally Phillips playing the part of "distressed bystander / survivor".

I directed my corespondent's attention to the clip which was used on the Richard & Judy show when 7/7 survivor Rachel North was a guest: here at 0.35 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Q4FH5ICCpk
(this is just an example as the clip is widely used)


I received a reply from Ryan Thomas from Channel 4 Viewer Enquiries.
(KMM2806469I19660L0KM)

He wrote:
"We are sorry to hear that you feel actresses should not be used in this
reconstruction."

Admittedly, Ryan probably has alot of mail to deal with and could easily make an innocent mistake. However, his response is quite telling. The clip - purportedly genuine -looks like nothing but a reconstruction - It contains a recognisable television actress for goodness' sake!

Please could you provide an explanation for this.

Thanks

Tim

[timothymurphy]

No wonder he refuses to say who the company was.
----------------------
At least this time we were spared the all knowing eye witness, wearing a Harley T shirt.

Somewhere on the J7 website, in the comments, Peter Power answers back and says that the company was Reed Elsevier
----------------------------

[brianv]

I know he's not quite up to speed yet but Jim Corr blogged this yesterday,.. I do wish he'd get it together - he's giving us paddies a bad name! I have hopes for him!

http://www.jimcorr.com/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... quiry.html

Our old pal is there in glorious teknicolour



This implausible shot screams a volunteer para-medics SIMULATION,

[SimonJCP]

I know he's not quite up to speed yet but Jim Corr blogged this yesterday,.. I do wish he'd get it together - he's giving us paddies a bad name! I have hopes for him!

http://www.jimcorr.com/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... quiry.html

Our old pal is there in glorious teknicolour



This implausible shot screams a volunteer para-medics SIMULATION,

The green from the truck also cuts into some of "him".

Such a laughable fake.

[Realism911]

G'day All,

There is something deceptive about Ripple effect... The fact that the narrator claims he is a Messiah?... give me break!! :lol: Roflcopter== :D .
I would like to see a new 7/7 video of the 7/7 false flag Psy/Op the British public and the rest of the world.

Timothy... your investigating into 7/7 is absolutely mind blowing, I haven’t read through "EVERY" post of yours but what I have read through I must admit ...I'm impressed.

A year ago I was quite surprised to see that the official story claims... The train that left Luton station " PAST/ON" 7.40 was cancelled as Illustrated below....


On the date -- 6/22/09 I checked out the Report of the Official Account of the Bombings in London and noticed this correction into the official story....

LONDON: THE STATIONERY OFFICE
Report of the Official Account of the Bombings in London on 7th July 2005
HC 1087 Session 2005-2006
ISBN 0 10 293774 5
2. Page 4. The time of 07.40 on the left side of the page immediately preceding the paragraph that commences, “The London King’s Cross train leaves Luton station”. The time of 07.40 is incorrect and should be replaced by 07.25 which is the correct time .

Wait a second..... Didn’t Sir Ian Blair label the investigation into July 7th, 'the biggest criminal inquiry in English history’?

If this is the biggest criminal inquiry in English history... why didn't the "investigator" ( :lol: ) just take a look at the time on the Luton station CCTV footage?

[brianv]

G'day All,

There is something deceptive about Ripple effect... The fact that the narrator claims he is a Messiah?... give me break!! :lol: Roflcopter== :D .
I would like to see a new 7/7 video of the 7/7 false flag Psy/Op the British public and the rest of the world.

Timothy... your investigating into 7/7 is absolutely mind blowing, I haven’t read through "EVERY" post of yours but what I have read through I must admit ...I'm impressed.

A year ago I was quite surprised to see that the official story claims... The train that left Luton station " PAST/ON" 7.40 was cancelled as Illustrated below....


On the date -- 6/22/09 I checked out the Report of the Official Account of the Bombings in London and noticed this correction into the official story....

LONDON: THE STATIONERY OFFICE
Report of the Official Account of the Bombings in London on 7th July 2005
HC 1087 Session 2005-2006
ISBN 0 10 293774 5
2. Page 4. The time of 07.40 on the left side of the page immediately preceding the paragraph that commences, “The London King’s Cross train leaves Luton station”. The time of 07.40 is incorrect and should be replaced by 07.25 which is the correct time .

Wait a second..... Didn’t Sir Ian Blair label the investigation into July 7th, 'the biggest criminal inquiry in English history’?

If this is the biggest criminal inquiry in English history... why didn't the "investigator" ( :lol: ) just take a look at the time on the Luton station CCTV footage?

Ssh Realism! The guy who discovered the missing Train is a "holocaust denier". How handy is that?



http://terroronthetube.co.uk/'

[Realism911]

Ssh Realism! The guy who discovered the missing Train is a "holocaust denier". How handy is that?

brianv - It's more handy than a 24 hr convience store :lol: ... Thanks for that mate!

Hello.

The Man In The Bandage :ph43r: ?..

No matter what way you look at this bandaged man here. It looks faked.


Notice the nice clean tear down his the leg of his pants ? What a real odd tear?. Honestly what does that...other than it being hand torn or cut with sizzors?


Look at 3rd pic down
Here’s one for anyone with a first aid ticket?as a general rule, medical kits, especially gauze bandages are usually kept topped up.. notice that he has only one thin layer of Gauze bandage around his head.? Surely if this was real, wouldn’t he have got a slight bit better First aid? This Man is a supposed Suicide bomb victim. :lol:


He doesn’t look shell shocked as if a bomb had just blown up next to him? In my opinion he actually looks like he is sniggering whilst looking at the camera?. As if he is acting, and trying to keep a straight face.

And it doesn’t take a scientist to put 2 and 2 together and see this man is faking it?..

What does raise a question. Is where exactly is he was in London on 7/7 I have found 2 conflicting locations that he was reported to have been seen in on 7/7.

Alleged (and I do say alleged) bus 30 bomb victim Daniel Obachike claims
60 seconds after the explosion, Obachike found a man in a grey suit with a bandaged head and torn trousers 70 meters away from the bus that exploded in Tavistock Square. He believes the man was pre bandaged and had some kind of prior knowledge of what was going on.

This mainstream media videographer who arrived early on at Tavistock Square. Journalist makes point of witnessing the suited man, memory sticks as it appears he'd been 'placed there.' Here is his interview.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VEfFWTknUWk

But the July 7th says with the following Video... The iconic image of 'grey-suit man' (name unknown), who is pictured lying on the ground in Brunswick Square some distance from Russell Square and is then seen being escorted back towards the station. This is filmed some 2 hours after the explosion.

Take a look at this video?.. It says it is filmed 2 hours after the explosions. In Brunswick Square? (580 meters from Tavistock Square)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqmaNHxZUyI&NR=1

No one would be lurking around central London, not going to a hospital for 2 hrs after a bomb almost blew them to smitherines.
I can’t seem to find a name for this clown anywhere? I don’t think he as ever come fowared He just seems to be an anonymous character?

My conclusion is that the guy is a 7/7 Actor? (And a bad one at that)
Conclusions Anyone?

Cheers
Realism :ph43r:

[simonshack]

Notice the nice clean tear down his the leg of his pants ? What a real odd tear?. Honestly what does that...other than it being hand torn or cut with sizzors?

:

Aah - but you are no bomb expert, my dear Realism, are you?

As you can clearly see from this other train bombing (in Madrid), that sort of trouser damage is to be fully expected when explosives detonate through a train carriage. Here is proof positive of this phenomena :



http://z6.invisionfree.com/Reality_Shac ... owtopic=55

[timothymurphy]

My conclusion is that the guy is a 7/7 Actor? (And a bad one at that)
Conclusions Anyone?

Realism, I urge you not to let the Julyseventh website do your thinking for you.
You have a brain and access to the entire internet.

I'm sure your observations are right that he's an actor.
But why limit your investigation to this:
http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/7-7-kings- ... quare.html ?

J7 seem to encourage a very limited little world of analysis.

Let’s bust the fu<ker open a little bit and simply look at things J7 doesn’t mention:

This isn’t definitive analysis and needs checking but?



This photograph is credited to Eriko Sugita
http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,1080622,00.html

I want to ask:
Was it feasible for Eriko Sugita to also be credited with these snaps of Blair and Bush in Scotland on the same day? (possibly the same morning)



http://picasaweb.google.com/rivier50/Ge ... 1280970178
http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl2215/ ... 412500.htm

Blair managed to travel to and fro between London and Scotland that day, but he had a Chinook helicopter?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/31st_G8_summit

I am not sure if a Japanese photographer would have found it so easy to flit between Scotland and London.

Hiroshima
In the context of this forum, where we have a thread questioning the authenticity of the atom bomb, it is interesting that Eriko Sugita has an association with the Hiroshima event.

This picture of hers at Ground Zero, Hiroshima, was “picture of the day” in The Iranian.
http://www.iranian.com/PhotoDay/2002/August/hiro2.html



It also illustrated an article about a memoir of Hiroshima being scrapped by its publisher due to discoveries of fakery in the stories:
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6220K720100303

She has written about Hiroshima ? in a propaganda-y way:
https://www.truthout.org/article/hirosh ... mall-nukes

"The morning of August 6, 59 years ago, was just another summer morning, but a single atomic bomb changed it into a morning that humankind will never forget," 11-year-old Koya Yurino told the assembly.

Hiroshima is her obsession:
http://www.ccnr.org/news/news_briefs_39.html
http://www.photius.com/rogue_nations/hiroshima.html

This photographer Eriko Sugita might have her fingers in two fakery pies.
7/7 and Hiroshima.

It will be strange if she has only one 7/7 picture credit though, especially since she bothered to use her teleporting technology to travel down from Scotland?

Perhaps more will turn up.


Finally, is this the same guy?:



In a photo by Andre Camara he has discarded his jacket, the arm he was using to support himself on another person is now broken, and it is the other leg that is injured now?

If so, he is deliberate conspiracy-bait I am afraid, like Richard Jones and the Kingstar van.


Conclusion
I don’t really have a conclusion about the bandaged man, and whether he is significant.
But if it’s unfeasible for Eriko Sugita to have taken both the Scotland pictures and the bandaged man pictures, maybe it is feasible for her to have taken the latter in a studio a few days previously?

And basically, Julyseventh webpages are potentially bad for you.
A member of this forum posts good stuff on the J7 forum and the moderators bully him.
Don’t take their bait, or at least recognize it as bait.

[brianv]

Interesting that Eriko Sugita also gets to take photographs of Earthquake Drills in Japan!

http://www.alertnet.org/db/topics/disas ... =in_detail

[Terence.drew]

Notice the nice clean tear down his the leg of his pants ? What a real odd tear?. Honestly what does that...other than it being hand torn or cut with sizzors?

:

Aah - but you are no bomb expert, my dear Realism, are you?

As you can clearly see from this other train bombing (in Madrid), that sort of trouser damage is to be fully expected when explosives detonate through a train carriage. Here is proof positive of this phenomena :



http://z6.invisionfree.com/Reality_Shac ... owtopic=55

I really don't like the insinuation that these ripped trouser men are actors -

that would mean they were dishonest ?

a much more likely explanation for the shredded pants, is that, in the thick of all the terrorist action,

these men turned angry and turned into incredible hulks (as shown below)






Splitting their pants, but in amazing Hulk style, not losing them.



Make and Do Home Hulk instructions

#
Step 1

Gather materials. Finding materials to make the Incredible Hulk costume is easy and doesn't cost much money. Find a pair of blue jeans that still fit in the waist but maybe not in length. You'll need quite a bit of green body or face paint to cover all the exposed areas of skin. Make sure it can be washed off with soap and water. And you'll need some temporary green hair color that also washes out easily.
#
Step 2

Make the pants. Use fabric scissors to cut off the lower portion of the pant legs just below the knee. Give the pants a ragged look by zigzagging the cut to make the material look as if it has been ripped apart. You might even want to add some dirty-looking stains to the pants for a more grungy effect.

http://www.ehow.com/how_2069936_make-in ... stume.html

[SimonJCP]

The tie on Bandage is a different color in this better-quality picture.
Also, the railing looks higher -- is this perspective?
Also, now it looks like the actor on the right of Bandage is wearing black, not blue pants.
In the lower-quality picture, the actor on the right's pants looked a bit like a darker shade of the priest's arm.

Looks like the actor on the right of Bandage is wearing the hat for the left actor's uniform/costume. Is the left actor wearing some kind of ID card in his pocket? This is interesting to me -- when Mark A. Humphrey was posing as an eyewitness on FOX News, one could see that he was wearing some kind of ID badge around his neck. Are the purposes of these ID cards/badges identify an actor-on-the scene as "safe" for an MSM interview? Or to help reporters find actor-witnesses who they were told have been set up to meet them and conduct mock interviews?

[SimonJCP]

Above we see a picture of a female 7/7 actor in a similar costume. I think we owe the perps one big thumbs-up for gender neutrality. Men and women both got their "Bandaged" survivor, just so everyone feels as directly visually affected and all!

A video of these two nameless, never-identified women can be found here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4JD6Pno ... r_embedded

Bandage appears to mainly serve as a visual "prop", as 85% of the talking is done by her companion. During their interview, it is stated that they were evacuated 3-4 minutes after the explosion. Rachel North, a well-known witness, claims that people started leaving after 20-30 minutes. One or both are very mistaken or lying.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4670099.stm

As the interview begins to get "slow", a policewoman intervenes and asks them to "come back to the hotel now" -- so were they waiting in the hotel, only to be brought out to conduct the pre-planned interview, and once they were done it was time to "go back in"? Was "the hotel" a command-center for the actors/participants?

[simonshack]

So, 2 days after the LONDON bombings (on July9, 2005) - this is what the Daily Star reports:

The blasts, which rocked the underground rail system and a bus during the morning rush hour, killed at least 37 people and injured around 700, according to police.

http://www.thedailystar.net/2005/07/09/d5070901108.htm

Does it take over 48hours to count 52 bodies?