SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012

Discussing the most relevant "sequels" or "reminders" of 9/11. The so-called "War On Terror" is a global scam finalized to manipulate this world's population with crass fear-mongering tactics designed to scare you shitless.
Post Reply
simonshack
Administrator
Posts: 6952
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy
Contact:

Re: SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012

Unread post by simonshack » Sat Jan 19, 2013 5:06 pm

*
"Emilie was an example not only to her little sisters but to her family, to all her little friends, and now she has become an example to the world about purity, innocence, tragedy and forgiveness," her aunt Jill Cottle Garrett said Saturday."
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/8655 ... tml?pg=all

Emilie Parker's "AUNT" fucks up her script: :rolleyes:


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gDKevHEsuJM
Utah wrote: Plenty of backstory here, on the Parker Family blog. Archives, linked on the bottom right of page, go back to 2008:
http://parkerfour.blogspot.com/
Image

Utah, what exactly is your friggin' agenda?

brianv
Member
Posts: 3959
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:19 pm
Contact:

Re: SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012

Unread post by brianv » Sat Jan 19, 2013 5:19 pm

simonshack wrote:*

Emilie Parker's "AUNT" fucks up her script: :rolleyes:
Utah wrote: Plenty of backstory here, on the Parker Family blog. Archives, linked on the bottom right of page, go back to 2008:
http://parkerfour.blogspot.com/
Image

Utah, what exactly is your friggin' agenda?
That's pretty obvious! What a pile of fake crap on that blog, but we must not mention it.

nonhocapito
Member
Posts: 2579
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 5:38 am
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012

Unread post by nonhocapito » Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:01 pm

brianv wrote:That's pretty obvious! What a pile of fake crap on that blog, but we must not mention it.
Despite having been allegedly online since 2008, at this stage a search on google for this web address returns no significant result. NONE. This being a blogspot blog hosted by google, this is sort of, well, impossible.

Image

I am pretty sure they put up that blog in a rush once they figured out the pretty little fake family was crumbling apart.

BUT. The search does return this other blog, of another Parker family that also call themselves "Parker Four", and that looks awfully similar (albeit the characters are more bank-commercial like): http://tmparker.blogspot.com/

Image

At least the little girl does look sort of the same.

Image

"Our little Dorothy - in her 2nd pair of Red Slippers"

HonestlyNow
Member
Posts: 453
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:15 pm

Re: SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012

Unread post by HonestlyNow » Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:15 pm

Image
screenshot from http://parkerfour.blogspot.com/
*
It's his brother's family?

Parker Brothers is a toy and game manufacturer and brand.

It's all just a game.
Last edited by HonestlyNow on Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

brianv
Member
Posts: 3959
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:19 pm
Contact:

Re: SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012

Unread post by brianv » Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:31 pm

Despite having been allegedly online since 2008, at this stage a search on google for this web address returns no significant result. NONE. This being a blogspot blog hosted by google, this is sort of, well, impossible.
Maybe Utah will tell us how he found said blog!

nonhocapito
Member
Posts: 2579
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 5:38 am
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012

Unread post by nonhocapito » Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:34 pm

Image
Screenshot from: http://parkerfour.blogspot.com/2008/02/ ... -lora.html

No comment indeed.

Another pretty example of motherly morbidity. Picture your child in pain and post it on the web:

Image
screenshot from http://parkerfour.blogspot.com/2009/10/ ... -went.html

Comment to this one: "Princess Emilie, that makes me laugh seeing her with her crown on!"

The above comment is attributed to one "Erin S", maker of this other blog: http://thestevensfam.blogspot.com/

The most recent post on this blog, the only one dated after Sandy Hook, does not mention the event at all, despite this person allegedly knowing "Emilie Parker" and her family:

Image
Screenshot from: http://thestevensfam.blogspot.it/2013/0 ... -here.html

One could find many strange ones, but I favor one simple explanation to this:
THIS IS ALL COMPUTER GENERATED CONTENT.
How many ENTIRELY ARTIFICIAL blogs and facebook pages, filled with images and chronicles of fake lives, are really out there? :blink:

Lazlo
Member
Posts: 220
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 4:13 pm

Re: SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012

Unread post by Lazlo » Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:27 pm

nonhocapito wrote:
Lazlo wrote:New? Logo for the Sandy Hook Hair Company

http://sandyhookhairco.com/
I don't understand. Where does this information come from? Where does it say that this is a new logo?

It is of possible interest that the website is registered to one Dawn Wright-Olivares http://whois.domaintools.com/sandyhookhairco.com a marketing expert who was also involved in some sort of Ponzi scheme story back in September: http://behindmlm.com/companies/zeek-rew ... t-the-sec/
http://iszeekrewardsascam.com/?faq=who- ... t-olivares
http://www.hpe.com/news/x2083612222/Zee ... about-scam
It involves this financial company "Zeek Rewards" that was shut down amid allegations of fraud. It would be interesting if Zeek turned out to be a front for the whole Lanza operation, although, well, there is no evidence for it yet. :)

Strangely enough anyway (but still nothing to do with the Lanza story) if you look into the HTML source of http://sandyhookhairco.com/ you will find at the top hidden links to a money lender website: http://paydayloans10tilp.com/cash-advan ... h-advances
It seems that "Sandy Hook Hair co" is really a front for another Ponzi scheme or similar affair.
Sorry, my bad! I made an atribution error. The statement that this was a "new" logo came from the video in which I found this information. That is why I put New? in the title. The person in the video claimed it was a new logo and my investigation, however brief, led me to think otherwise. Anyway what you found is intriguing so it wasn't a wash, I don't think. I will continue to search for the video. Thanks

Utah
Member
Posts: 112
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 5:43 am

Re: SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012

Unread post by Utah » Sun Jan 20, 2013 7:28 am

simonshack wrote:*
Utah wrote: Plenty of backstory here, on the Parker Family blog. Archives, linked on the bottom right of page, go back to 2008:
http://parkerfour.blogspot.com/
Image

Utah, what exactly is your friggin' agenda?
Simon,
I am not sure why my posting a link to that blog has got you questioning my motives, nor do I understand the significance of the image from the blog that you posted. I understand you have had issues with infiltrators stirring up trouble in the past, but give me a break! Is your issue with my contention that Robbie Parker and family are likely 'real people' ? I have in no way endorsed the Sandy Hoax; merely pointed out that I believe there are some 'real life' players in the mix. Is that not allowed?
brianv wrote:
simonshack wrote:*

Utah, what exactly is your friggin' agenda?
That's pretty obvious! What a pile of fake crap on that blog, but we must not mention it.
If it is so obvious, please explain it to Simon. Apparently, he has some questions...

But, seriously, in what way did I say not to mention it? Personally, I don't do image analysis, never have. I really just don't have the skills or background. I have no idea how real or fake the images on that blog are. I thought the existence of presumably older images of the Parkers was a worthy find, so I posted it, so you image analyzer types could check it out. I am more of a search engine/database guy, myself.

I did urge caution, with respect to red herrings, when I linked to Robbie Parker's Facebook page, because I hold the apparently forbidden view that Robbie Parker is most likely a real person. What I did not want to see happen is cluesforum look foolish by insisting everyone is fake, if the perps have, as I suspect, inserted a few 'real life' players into this latest simulation.

Didn't MrSinclair point out (on page 3) that another 'parent of a victim' (Jimmy Greene) was certainly a real person, based on his personal experience, without stirring up a bunch of hostility?

Utah
Member
Posts: 112
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 5:43 am

Re: SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012

Unread post by Utah » Sun Jan 20, 2013 8:10 am

nonhocapito wrote:
Despite having been allegedly online since 2008, at this stage a search on google for this web address returns no significant result. NONE. This being a blogspot blog hosted by google, this is sort of, well, impossible.
Actually, it is not at all impossible. I am surprised to see the most consistently spot-on and logical poster on this forum be so totally off the mark on this one!

You can easily prevent a blogspot blog from being cached by google, by adjusting the search visibility settings. According to Google, a blog won't appear in search results if you've set a preference to exclude it from search engines http://support.google.com/blogger/bin/a ... swer=87065
brianv wrote:
Maybe Utah will tell us how he found said blog!
I wish I could say that I found it with my superior search engine abilities, the truth is, I found it posted anonymously on a Newtown-related thread on godlikeproductions.com. Generally, a pretty lame site, but you will stumble across the occasional gem there.

The original post seems to have been deleted, but it has since been reposted on davidicke and lunatic outpost, which you probably could confirm with google.

By the way, the blog in question was the top result when I tried the same search on Duck Duck Go. :rolleyes:

teriyaki taryaki
Member
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 1:27 am

Re: SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012

Unread post by teriyaki taryaki » Sun Jan 20, 2013 12:22 pm

Utah wrote:

Didn't MrSinclair point out (on page 3) that another 'parent of a victim' (Jimmy Greene) was certainly a real person, based on his personal experience, without stirring up a bunch of hostility?

A 'real person' in what way ? Is 'the man with no name' in "For A Few Dollars More" a 'real' person ? Of course not.

But it IS the flesh & blood actor Clint Eastwood.

Here the man named 'Robbie the Robot douchebag Parker' is a character in a movie called 'Sandy Captain Hook.'

Is this a real person ?

How could he possibly be if he's a character in this absurd farce ?

Is Robbie Parker his real name ?

Who cares ?

Is he 'flesh and blood' in real life ?

Most probably, but again, who cares ? The 'man with no name' is also 'flesh and blood' off the screen.

If the character in 'For A Few Dollars More' was named 'Clint Eastwood' instead of 'the Man with No Name,' would this mean it was 'a real life person' ?

Of course not ! It would still be an actor playing a character only named the same as the actor playing him, an entirely fictitious creation, who only shot and killed 30 people on the screen and not in 'real life.'

If there are any actual 'real life documentary events' depicted and mixed into this absurd farce of a movie called 'Sandy Hook' that were not in the original script, you would have to prove them first, and even if you did, what percentage mixed in would have to be 'actual events' before any difference would be made to the authenticity or credibility of a story already so ridiculously fictional ?

In other words, would it make a difference if you shot a movie entirely on location, in city streets, with real life people going on their way with their real lives, while you were playing your fiction for the cameras ?

Of course not !! Hundreds of filmmakers have done that and no one calls something like that 'cinema verite' or even a 'documentary.' It would still be a fake and fictional creation with some documentary locations or elements in the background. Now, the more you interacted with the real people on location, OUTSIDE of your script, the more 'real events' would be added to your fiction and if you make your entire film that of your interactions with people in a real location, then you will have arrived at the documentary stage or 'the fiction of the streets,' a level more authentic and closer to real events in real lives, although, of course, still not necessarily the 'truth' of anything.

Image

brianv
Member
Posts: 3959
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:19 pm
Contact:

Re: SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012

Unread post by brianv » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:07 pm

"I found it posted anonymously on a Newtown-related thread on godlikeproductions.com."

What do you mean anonymously?

Care to post a link?

Then you found it listed on some obscure search engine??

warriorhun
Member
Posts: 514
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 9:26 pm

Re: SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012

Unread post by warriorhun » Sun Jan 20, 2013 7:13 pm

Dear simonshack,

As lux already pointed out in an excellent previous post, I also think this faked event is indeed a milestone. Never before was the topic of the possibility of media fakery discussed out in the open by the MSM!

Seriously, I have never expected such a thing to ever happen! Not even in a negative way, meaning in outright denial and outrage over the mentioned possibility of it! Because this is a very dangerous if not suicidal topic for the Media, because if the idea that faked news may exist takes root in the minds of the masses, that can cause a serious un-controlled paradigm-shift in the way people treat media information (not believing the shit rammed down their throats and manipulating them 24/7 any more).

The two things I noticed speak for themselves, two recurring phenomenons we have long ago noticed here in our forum discussions about faked news psy-opses:

1. They use the "conspiracy-theorist" branding on anybody who dares to utter that this may be a faked event. As we very well know, "conspiracy-theorist" is a psychological trigger-word they built up recently. They conditioned the viewers that when they hear this word from the mouth of "respectable authority figures" aka. Media anchors, the viewers will automatically ignore the person who is branded as such, equating it with "crazy", no matter what the person says.

2. They use the psychological barrier of dead children and grieving relatives, as the "final frontier". If you question the existence of them, you are kind of equal to a "Holocaust-denier", and you are "spitting on the graves of dead children and in the face of their grieving parents". Its a pathetic last resort, but on the other hand a very strong one, taking advantage over our best, most human feelings. The outrage over the possibility of offending the memory of dead children and offending their grieving parents, is similar to the outrage one feels over the original "shooting".

So, what do you think: what gave the Media such courage to address the media fakery issue in this case instead of being ominously silent on it?
Was it a pre-planned thing all along, or maybe they just couldn't avoid the issue, given the fast spread of "sandy hook truthing" over the internet?
Maybe they are simply trying nipping such ideas like media fakery in the bud, branding people like us as crazy motherfuckers barking at the Moon, for once and for all, in the minds of the TV-viewer masses?
What's your views on that issue?

Brutal Metal
Member
Posts: 401
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:58 am
Contact:

Re: SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012

Unread post by Brutal Metal » Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:06 pm

^ I think there's a method to the mainstream media madness! Now the sheep can really think the conspiracy theorists are WHACKOS! Once again 90% of comments regarding Sandy Hook fakery sound like this "HOW DARE YOU TALK ABOUT THOSE DEAD PRECIOUS CHILDREN AND TEACHERS LIKE THIS!"
A brand new SH analysis vid... This Phelps/Sexton deal is Strange? Someone needs to find this couple for a followup interview, are they currently residing in Florida or Conn? Where's Magnum P.I. when you need him? :D
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_nUOBSN03TU

resolution
Member
Posts: 162
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 5:15 am

Re: SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012

Unread post by resolution » Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:28 pm

Brutal Metal wrote:Where's Magnum P.I. when you need him? :D
Living in Hawaii.

Farcevalue
Member
Posts: 390
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 11:21 am

Re: SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012

Unread post by Farcevalue » Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:32 pm

It is my suspicion that the hoax hangout is built into this psyop, due to the apparent carelessness of the faked images, the transparency of the actors, the planted conspiracy fodder like the warlock hand signs, etc. It has been suggested, if not confirmed, even as recently as last week (although the lookupanyone database alteration is only circumstantial, see: http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.ph ... 5#p2380250) that Clues Forum is monitored by TPTB. If this is indeed the case, they must surely have been aware of the minimal effort that would be required to expose this as a virtual event.

The sloppiness could be unintentional of course, and all the attention given to Professor Tracy and Anderson Cooper's outrage could be damage control, but it's more likely that it's a test of the gullibility of the public at large, or a honeypot designed to lure the skeptics into the open for a humiliating reveal.

A common rebuttal of any argument that references facts or lack of facts is, "The government is too incompetent to pull off such a complex maneuver." People are adaptable to that which creates positive outcomes for them, if creating media driven virtual events serves a particular set of individuals, with practice they will become more skilled at performing them. I find it somewhat of an inconsistency that in the 11 years since 9/11, they would have digressed in the techniques of the charade.

The story may not be over yet. I was trying to create a bit of curiosity in someone the other day by asking what they knew of the reports, such as how many "shots" were fired. The replied: "A lot, because he used an assault rifle." So who knows, maybe their work is done.

Post Reply