Discussing the most relevant "sequels" or "reminders" of 9/11. The so-called "War On Terror" is a global scam finalized to manipulate this world's population with crass fear-mongering tactics designed to scare you shitless.
beforewedie wrote:I think a lot of the reason as to why some people believe in this hoax is because of the people who were shot. I know a lot of people who passed (Norway is a small country, few inhabitants) so there were for sure deaths. A friend of my sisters survived the "attack" and she's still disturbed and broken. So isn't it possible that Breivik actually did all this - but with help and thourough planning because of the bigger agenda the government has?
According to you THERE WERE DEAD. Could you show a picture of a victim whom you "knew", so I can believe you, laugh and investigate?
BTW, have you read the last 178 pages of this thread to say that?
is there any way to possible write in a way where you can respect other people for what they believe? There was a funeral. There was a body. I can tell you her name on a private message. I knew the girl. Meaning I didn't "knew" her. I KNEW her.I know her adress. I know her parents. I know the family photos in her home. I know how she sat in class with my sister everyday, I know how she waves to say hello as I pass. I know how she dressed like at parties. I know how white her body was on July 22. I know how her hugs feel. I know Breivik is just another lame excuse for directing a larger agenda from the government - but it isn't impossible that they (him) did kill those youths. What are a few deaths compared to tall the mass control they will be getting over us? do you get it? do you get that I have read ALL the 178 pages and STILL am allowed to wonder about those things? are you gonna stoop to the level of those who blindly accept everything and wont allow anything else, any other opinion, to enter the debate? is it ok with you that I ask those questions? can you live with it? did you have a good laugh? was it a loud one? a quiet one?
beforewedie wrote:I think a lot of the reason as to why some people believe in this hoax is because of the people who were shot. I know a lot of people who passed (Norway is a small country, few inhabitants) so there were for sure deaths. A friend of my sisters survived the "attack" and she's still disturbed and broken.
Before posting such unsupported malarkey masquerading as personal testimony, why didn't you make even the slightest little bit of an effort? There are only 170 prior pages of this forum. Did you have a hard time finding any of them?
I'm really having a difficult time understanding how I can't ask questions. I read all the pages. She's still in the coffin.
This discussion is here to make us all aware and show the hoax. Because there was one for sure. But that can't mean that EVERYTHING else that ANYONE else says, is a false or an unsupported malarkey I mean what the f? How can we get all the facts if we decide that little me didn't actually experience all of this because she can't possible be dead. She IS dead - and of course I have to get this out BECAUSE of the 170 pages prior to this? Why the hell not? What happened to investigating, to figuring out, to see ALL the parts of the hoax? Do you live here? Would you like to come visit? My house? We can drive to her home, I have a car. I can have you visit all her friends. I can find her note books and photos and absolutely everything. We can dig up the coffin, see her body and touch it. We can understand that the case of 22/7 is an attempt from the government to control us, we can realise that most of the videos and photos from that day has been manipulated, and we can TRY........... just TRY (it seems to be reeeeeally hard but I'm sure you can do it!) to understand that the government MAYBE would have set up a REAL killing spree so that people would really get scared! So that the reality bit would affect us on a deep level, so that fear would set in and we would naturally buy everything else the media says about the case. This is the ultimate in all terror cases, i all mass manipulation, a REAL staged event (with 77 dead kids just for the fear to kick in) to keep controlling us.
Why - just why can't I ask those questions without being ridiculed?
beforewedie wrote: I know a lot of people who passed (Norway is a small country, few inhabitants) so there were for sure deaths. A friend of my sisters survived the "attack" and she's still disturbed and broken. So isn't it possible that Breivik actually did all this - but with help and thourough planning because of the bigger agenda the government has?
You actually know a lot of people who passed? Personally? Can you list the names of these people, please? Thanks.
If you don't mind, please also let us know the name of your sister's friend. I don't think this is asking too much, is it? This wouldn't be any sort of invasion of privacy, would it? Thanks.
sent you a PM. No it's not an invasion of my privacy to ask for details about a dead friend as I'm sure you'd love for me to ask you about the same thing if you have a dead friend that I don't believe has passed, but I assume you already know that it's OK with me - seeing you wrote "thanks" without me be able to answer first.
beforewedie wrote: I know a lot of people who passed (Norway is a small country, few inhabitants) so there were for sure deaths. A friend of my sisters survived the "attack" and she's still disturbed and broken. So isn't it possible that Breivik actually did all this - but with help and thourough planning because of the bigger agenda the government has?
You actually know a lot of people who passed? Personally? Can you list the names of these people, please? Thanks.
If you don't mind, please also let us know the name of your sister's friend. I don't think this is asking too much, is it? This wouldn't be any sort of invasion of privacy, would it? Thanks.
beforewedie wrote:
sent you a PM. No it's not an invasion of my privacy to ask for details about a dead friend as I'm sure you'd love for me to ask you about the same thing if you have a dead friend that I don't believe has passed, but I assume you already know that it's OK with me - seeing you wrote "thanks" without me be able to answer first.
Så vær så god!
Beforewedie,
I retract my anticipated, courteous thanks - since I now have every reason to believe that you are nothing but an umpteenth troll spamming this forum with bullcrap. However, if you wish to prove me wrong - and have any wish to work up any sort of credibility with us, I will ask you again to provide the name of this person you claim to have known so well. There is no rational/imaginable reason whatsoever for you to withhold the name of an alleged Breivik victim - all of which have been publicly released for the whole world to read about.
I have no wish to entertain/exchange private messages with you. Since you decided to join this discussion forum - and submitted your tale to all of its readers, it is now up to you to publicly try and convince anyone of your claims. In doing so, I advise you to refrain from 'spicing up' your writings with tacky, emotional garbage - lest you wish being laughed out of this forum at short notice.
Why are the trolls so persistent? I guess since so much of the media focus is now on "Breivik", and that the Breivik imagery is all shown to be fabricated, the trolls try the other way of 'authenticating' this shameful play: 'first hand' 'knowledge' of victims. Pretty desperate stuff, lol.
Rather than invite members of this forum to dig up and touch your sister's friends body - which seems a little disrespectful, how about you ask sis to post say 6 photos of her friend? Ones that we won't find elsewhere on the internet.
As the probability has now become stronger that even the Breivik court hearings are digital constructs, I decided to go back in time a little - and found this AlJazeera video, called:
It seems that the whole Utoya/Breivik farce has been and continues to be an important work for the PsyOphood in terms of getting more and more stuff created completely digitally.
PLEASE STOP THIS NOW- Years of your hard work and the increasing authority/credibility with reference to 9/11 is being pissed away in keystrokes on the back of this thread and Simon I quote you and appeal to you directly:
''I was more keen to believe they were using some kind of actor for the continuation of the psyop into the trial: but I am starting to see that they instead seem to be doing fine with a created 3D character like the early pictures suggested. Pretty amazing.''
I could go on and rebuke and cite your sycophants but my intent is not to kick the hornets nest...
This is not a personal attack Simon - but where you lead many others on this forum follow - not to mention the increasing numbers who stumble/are actively directed to watch your film September Clues.
I personally do believe that you and others (word up reel.d') have whittled (with reference to your film and some resultant threads on this forum) the 'stick' to near Truth with reference to 9/11 (which is the genesis of this forum) - so please relax, breathe, reflect and logically and honestly adhere to the oft' repeated clarion call of Ockham's razor with reference to OSLO and UTØYA, 7/22 2011...
Dandy wrote: - so please relax, breathe, reflect and logically and honestly adhere to the oft' repeated clarion call of Ockham's razor with reference to OSLO and UTØYA, 7/22 2011...
Dandy,
I feel very relaxed, thank you very much. I strive to progress carefully, step by step, with every new analysis that I undertake. The issue at hand right now is the judge's "rocking" chair (as posted above). Do you have any explanation for it, Dandy?
It seems to me that YOU - with your prompt response to the above - are getting twitchy. Btw, where have you been all this time? You have made a total of 8 posts on this forum. One that I well remember is this one: http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.ph ... 7#p2349087
It seems like you're in love with the "sycophant" word!
Simon - I am getting twitchy that you are pissing away the credibility of your 9/11 research (and the resultant credibility of others advocating it) with the posited notion that the Breivik trail and resultant imagery is a digital and simulated construct. My 'prompt' response was not as you presumed catalysed by your ROCKING CHAIR post as I freely admit to have not read/seen it (prior to my post) and yes it is very odd and no I cannot provide an explanation for it...
