Okay, I apologise and retract the accusations but will let my post stand merely as a possible interpretation of your previous post.MartinL wrote:Feel free to apologize for making these poorly researched and baseless accusations at your own leisure.
I was looking back through the tons of research you have posted here and found this post of yours from 10 Mar 2010. I like it:
*MartinL wrote:Hey guys, since we started pushing the latest discoveries in the vicsim research there has been started a massive discrediting campaing where slander is chosen over evidence when they are promoting their little psy-op.
I don't think their shill tactics will work on people who are awake. Most people I have shown this to realizes that TV fakery, and now fabricated identities who never existed is of massive importance.
Shills always accuse me of "causing division in the truth movement", so let's put an end to it and have everyone gather around the real evidence.
The 911 perpetrators are crashing and burning as we speak, so let's turn on the heat.
Edit: Posted 9 Feb 2011:
I have a question for you: given the above quoted post, if you believe with 80% certainty that you saw with your own eyes an individual who you feel could be connected to the Breivik incident, why are you not willing to do any further research on the matter?MartinL wrote:There will always be a new half faked/fully faked news event, but if a person understands ONE fake event (9/11) their fakery immune system will be able to fend off coming TV-fakery on the news.
Bottom line is that we are straying away from the original purpose of this research which was 9/11 and it's not helping anyone.
I will read through the posts in this thread with great attention when I get the time, but the above is my statement on the state-of-affairs at the Reality Shack forum. We wanna stick to reality - then lets focus on the real reality of the people behind the curtains.
There is an elephant in the room, and us TV-fakery researchers should be able to spot it, in the same way we were able to spot the 9/11 bullshit.
Edit 2: Okay, I now see that the majority of the tons of posts you have made in the past were an attempt to steer the research on 9/11 towards the "influences of Israel and Zionism."
You make a post on 4 July 2011 and then return a month later (2 Aug 2011) following the Breivik incident of 22 July 2011. Unsurprisingly you tie the Breivik incident in with your focus on the "Jewish conspiracy":
After that, as I have previously noted, it all gets a bit silly.MartinL wrote:Surely, you have understood by now how this is a vast international jewish-masonic conspiracy against mankind?
"Let them drown in their own blood" - comment on an israeli website after the attack on Norway.
This was caused by jewish zionist poison http://www.jpost.com/International/Arti ... ?id=230762
2 days before the attack, this appeared in the jewish magazine Frontpage:
The infamous Norwegian Vidkun Quisling, who assisted Nazi Germany as it conquered his own country, must be applauding in his grave.
During the Nazi occupation of Norway, nearly all Jews were either deported to death camps or fled to Sweden and beyond. Today, Norway is effectively under the occupation of anti-Semitic leftists and radical Muslims, and appears willing to help enable the destruction of the Jewish state of Israel.
For example, one of Norway’s leading intellectuals, Jostein Gaarder, published an op-ed article in a major Norwegian daily newspaper in 2006 arguing against recognizing the state of Israel in its current form and claiming that Judaism is “an archaic national and warlike religion.”
http://frontpagemag.com/2011/07/20/the- ... of-norway/
"Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed"