Jared Loner wrote:Burningame wrote:reel.deal wrote:
For me 911 was about adults behaving badly. But with the Moon Hoax, with its denial of the science, its stripping away of what should be Mankind’s greatest glory, it’s something that also intrinsically affects children, or to be more precise, the child-like nature of humanity itself. There seems to be a lot of “Emperor’s New Clothes” syndrome around a lot lately.
man never went to the moon…
911 was also a "denial of science". From my understanding of physics, it would be impossible for an aluminum plane to "cut" through a steel and concrete building. But wait, we all saw it on tv, so it must be true! Lol.
Yesterday I was chatting to a university entry level high school science teacher, about the complexities of Physics & Newton's laws of motion & gravity, so as to lead into a discussion about the Moon landings.
Oh ! he says, thats easy for every action there is an equal & opposite reaction, if you hit something using an object the damage to what's been hit is relative to any damage to the object used, for every action there is an opposite equal reaction..
Then I asked him about Newton's law of Motion when applied to the moon landings,
"oh when the space craft leaves the Earth's atmosphere it travels through space, at the same speed in which it exits the earth's atmosphere, without the need to burn any more fuel until it reaches the orbit of another planet (moon)".
I said, "well if the space craft can travel through space at thousands of miles an hour, what are the chances of being hit by a piece of speeding space debris also travelling at thousands of MPH"
"Oh! they would have had computors that would have worked all that out in advance" he repied.
Now for the good bit. I said " if you apply Newton's law of motion to 9/11, how did 2 aluminium planes each disappear into the WTC towers with steel columns spaced less than one metre apart."
"Because the towers were stationary, and the 2 planes had the momentum to cut through the steel columns" Was his reply.
I managed to keep my cool, then went on to explain UA93 burrowing into the ground, "Oh ! I never knew that."
Do Newton's law of motion & gravity really exist in the way we have been taught at school, or is it a form of straight jacketing brain washing ?
What's the energy source for gravity itself,is it just the magnetic pull of the earth's atmosphere ?
As well as all the faked footage, amusingly & well debunked here. I still find the Van Allen radiation belt the most undebunkable aspect of the whole depressing moon hoax.
This could well be some form of limited hang out set up by the hoaxers.
I've always wondered why so many astronots were used for the 7 moon trips, that's 18 more people who could become potential whistle blowers, not to mention the invaluable experience of those who had allegedly made the trip. It wouldn't surprise me if they were all just a close nit bunch of freemasons.
But what if the Van Allen belt itself could be used to debunk the debunkers.
NASA saying, we decided to use different astronots for each trip because of the dangers of over exposure to the radiation of the Van Allen belts.
We could not let onto the astronots about any of the dangers travelling through the VA belts' high radiation, because none of them would have then been prepared to go to the moon.
I think this is still one of the best moon hoax sites, what I wouldn't give to get hold of that footage.
http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicapollo.html
In western Australia during the live broadcast of the Apollo 11 moon landing, several people saw a very unusual occurrence. One viewer, Una Ronald watched the telecast and was astonished with what she saw.
The residents of Honeysuckle Creek, Australia, actually saw a different broadcast to the rest of the World. Just shortly before Armstrong stepped onto the Moons surface, a change could be seen where the picture goes from a stark black to a brighter picture. Honeysuckle Creek stayed with the picture and although the voice transmissions were broadcast from Goldstone, the actual film footage was broadcast from Australia. As Una watched Armstrong walking on the surface of the Moon she spotted a Coke bottle that was kicked in the right hand side of the picture. This was in the early hours of the morning and she phoned her friends to see if they had seen the same thing, unfortunately they had missed it but were going to watch the rebroadcast the next day. Needless to say, the footage had been edited and the offending Coke bottle had been cut out of the film. But several other viewers had seen the bottle and many articles appeared in The West Australian newspaper
Edit, just revisited that site for the first time in a couple of years, I'd forgotten about the bullshit UFO inference at the beginning.
Also the bit about Honeysuckle creek is a bit odd because it's near Canberra, thousands of miles and a 3 hour time zone from Western Australia. Maybe it's a hoax hoax disinformation site.
Edit : just found this
Some viewers claim they had seen the Coke bottle, and several articles about this appeared in the newspaper West Australian. Western Australia received their coverage in a different way than the rest of the World, and this was the only area where there was not a delay in the so-called live transmission
http://flash1.gravlab.com/biblefirst/fa ... anding.htm
