Cluesforum—Exposing Mass Deception

Seneca: the more I think about it, the more I realize your experiment would not be the last word. It would address the question about friction, I agree. But there are those who maintain the change in speed is due to changes in forces, for example centripetal or inertial, which 'return to normal' aft...

two vectors of force perpendicular to each other (like propulsion and gravity) result in two (simultaneous/successive?) movements No, we're not saying anything actually moves in a zigzag. That's a metaphor . You are confusing the equations of physics for the physical objects they describe. What we'...

A simple experiment would be the following. It is similar but simpler than the one posted on youtube. You only need one tube and one ball. Instead of a circle(spiral) you make only half a circle followed by a straight part. Like the letter U . At the end of the turn you measure a short length ( =l ...

[As I went to post this, I saw that VexMan had already answered. I will leave this as is, as I think our answers are complementary.] Well, I guess I'm just a bit dense - and will probably need another lifetime (or a brain transplant) in order to wrap my head around this Pi=4 thing... Meanwhile, I wo...

VexMan » October 7th, 2016, 8:33 am wrote: I just want to mention that such research work may show as neutral and may even actually correctly inform where to look next.

Yes, I agree, there is much that can be learned from such maps.

To be sure, if JOE (red dot in my below diagram) wishes to walk from A to C, he will get to C approx 21% earlier (if he walks along the curved green path) than if he chooses to walk from A to B to C: Well, MM's argument is that, no, they should arrive at the same time. The distance traveled as you ...

Now, would it be too much to ask of you two to elaborate in a - ehrm - scientific manner as to why B would be the correct answer? Thanks! Also, would daddie_o please contact MM by e-mail and ask him to comment on my above post? Thanks. I will contact him, but no guarantee that he'll answer. As for ...

Simon, that's an ingenious question! And just goes to show once again what a very useful engine that Thomas is. I think the answer has to be B according to the theory, but I can't say for certain.

Vexman: yeah, I had never really looked into him. But if somebody is interviewed on RT, that automatically disqualifies them in my view. So yeah, definitely 'proceed with caution.' The network diagrams you pasted in are interesting, but your point about his work that is that he only names pawns. And...

No, I wouldn't know the first thing about that. I saw it bandied about on "letstroll" 10 years ago. Sounds like bullshit to me! And where do you go if you click the latest post icon beside the poster's name in the right column? You think COINTELPRO is bullshit? Or shills? Ah! I knew I mus...

@daddie_o I clicked on the MM (Man or Myth) link from the front page quite by accident and this caught my eye Sorry! I did not mean to accuse you or brianv of being cointelpro shills. Oh really, did you?? What exactly IS a "cointelpro shill"? No, I said I did not accuse either of you. If ...

At the point where the straight path ball has traveled to the Pi marker, the circular path ball is just a little past the three-quarter point of the circular path. Bearing in mind that the two sections of tube in question were cut at the same length, the only reasonable explanation, as far as I can...

The balls are not self-propelled, so the circular path ball will slow down - it has no other energy to give away to the opposing force that is diverting it from its preferred straight path. ... The stills labelling the ball at 'quarter 1', 'quarter 2' etc show the ball is not actually bang on the q...

I appreciate the thoughtful and provocative discussion here. I think in this case the Rothschilds and the Pereire brothers seem to be orchestrating this. But of course we can't know. Nor can we know if they are really at the top of the pyramid. Peter Phillips, a sociology professor at Sonoma State U...

It's measured at the start, so there's no good reason not to measure it at the end as well. Actually there is a good reason: to make the tube go in a circle, it ends where the circle begins, so there's no where to add a straight section to then measure the speed again, unless you bent the tube up o...