Cluesforum—Exposing Mass Deception

I read this and I just don't know. The links and conspiracy in the Laurel Canyon music scene is similar in this way. There are all these connections but could it be that everyone in the 30's-60's were so wrapped up in wars and nukes and fear that everyone for the most part was "involved" b...

It also explains the "Population Hoax". If the world is already believed to be jam-packed and truly defined, more fear, more drama, less thinking, no need to look elsewhere to populate except "space". :lol: Google: there's more land than what they say... "There's no more lan...

I'd like to put this out there, maybe it belongs in derailing but I think not. I'm starting to steer my research more and more into the why of the whole fakery business. It's obvious to many that there is a massive hijack in place. It's the past and current researchers who put their findings out the...

Hoi wrote: It's like the old saying, "if soldiers stopped signing up ...Well, how about if media folks were willing to actually do research and insist — as a front united by its humanity — on putting claimants in their place? Public detectives is more like what we need in place of these useles...

There is no reason to believe any video in this day and age given the CGI tech. Well, you have ammunition for that belief, that's true. I would say there is no reason to believe a video is undoctored these days, and different video artifacts reveal different types of video changes. Some are indicat...

Hawking is a litmus test. War of the Worlds-esque. Belief is a motherfucker to reason & observation. Belief is reality to those who believe. That's the crux. It's ultimately a matter of human behavior and programming. The firewall of programming is a default to labels & name-calling. The dro...

So...does that drone hover in a stable, non-moving hover position? Doesn't make sense. Is it a drone we're seeing on the 9/11 heli vids? Nope. So why here? Why does CGI need a drone? It's obviously CGI, no? Drone explanation seems more like a reason to believe than a logical filming perspective. Jus...

Things that defy gravity (haha) in this case: a) Who is filming this? Up close camera, distant camera (with cows on the property!), OVERHEAD cam...wtf? b) Cows? c) Now typical bird flyby d) Open air fins & the "aerodynamics" of the cgi rocket. (I half expected it to ass over teakettle ...

Fetzer in today's Minneapolis Star Tribune. Interesting to me how belief is always at the core of censure. Funny that it's Fetzer who gets scrutinized...over his holocaust findings. egad. http://www.startribune.com/local/south/289227381.html Norman Butler, owner of a small Northfield pub that holds ...

The market in "Asia" may not be cost effective for chemtrail use. Let's say for argument sake that TeleVision is the main reason for chemtrails and GPS is either right up there with it or a secondary beneficiary. Given that European nations have been reported to have chemtrails, it may mea...

Intel has been providing his software for the past 20 years. Here is another interesting patent (see link for more: http://patents.justia.com/patent/6510413): Distributed synthetic speech generation Patent (Patent # 6,510,413) Jun 29, 2000 - Intel Text that is to be synthesized into human speech is ...

I find Stephen Hawking and the technology he uses for speech synthesis keys to the hoax. The patents on his Speech Plus software reveal their true nature: (see below, emphasis mine). The main point is remote control . Verbal computer terminal system Patent number: 4716583 Abstract: A telephonic data...

I'd like to comment on "Operation Smoke Puff". The puzzle is coming together. In a simple If/Then scenario we can explain the how AND why the perps do what they do. I think it's safe to say that for most of the hoaxes, we have come to see media & government corporations (i.e. mitre, di...

Seven guys+ shoot every target, only one shooter/bullet hits the target in every case. All others hit the hill behind or shoot past/miss the target. Also, I tend to ask, "who is filming this?". I look at how many camera angles are shown. Seems so many of these have the feel of production r...

For me, it's the editing cuts. Same with NASA footage of the Challenger disaster. The video is supposed to have the feel of a self-taped message but the cuts reveal edits, changes in perspective and there are curious near-subliminal edit/cut frames that cause the viewer to blink. It seems like trigg...