Search found 67 matches
- Tue Oct 11, 2016 8:14 pm
- Forum: The Question of Fakery
- Topic: Discussing Miles W. Mathis
- Replies: 250
- Views: 443559
Re:
3 - The whole basis of the idea that “pi=4 in kinematic situations” stems from an incredibly unconvincing source; Wernher von Braun (via another well-known liar; Richard C. Hoagland). What Mathis describes is that “rockets were pictured in the wrong place; 21% off” giving Mathis the insight to this...
- Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:53 pm
- Forum: The Question of Fakery
- Topic: Discussing Miles W. Mathis
- Replies: 250
- Views: 443559
Re: Discussing Miles W. Mathis
SacredCowSlayer Also, it's times like this where I miss Painterman. He could always peg the exact forum disruption tactics with precision, and I enjoyed reading his layout of such. But I digress. Do you? Besides all you've written in that particular post, which is just more fog in my humble opinion...
- Mon Oct 10, 2016 1:47 pm
- Forum: The Question of Fakery
- Topic: Physical π : Pi's relationship to 4
- Replies: 139
- Views: 168581
Re: Physical π : Pi's relationship to 4
Seneca, I understand your view. I still think eliminating friction would be a good thing to do in any such setup. And I do think it would influence the experiment, to be exact, it would influence the measurement of time at the end of A section / beginning of B section. So at the start of section B, ...
- Mon Oct 10, 2016 8:21 am
- Forum: The Question of Fakery
- Topic: Physical π : Pi's relationship to 4
- Replies: 139
- Views: 168581
Re: Physical π : Pi's relationship to 4
daddie_o, Vexman, if you are so sure you are right, couldn't you do this simple, inexpensive experiment? You have to admit the proof would be more overwhelming. You wouldn't have to use terms like "exactly as" to describe it (when other people see it is not exactly at the same time). That...
- Mon Oct 10, 2016 5:17 am
- Forum: The Question of Fakery
- Topic: Physical π : Pi's relationship to 4
- Replies: 139
- Views: 168581
Re: Physical π : Pi's relationship to 4
[...]I'm not sure you belong on clues forum. Based on your responses to bongostaple, you are to a greater or lesser extent insinuating that those unwilling to call a circle a square (Simon, brianv, SCS, Kham, aa5, myself and likely many others) are either stupid, lazy, poor readers, time wasters, p...
- Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:51 am
- Forum: The Question of Fakery
- Topic: Physical π : Pi's relationship to 4
- Replies: 139
- Views: 168581
Re: Physical π : Pi's relationship to 4
aa5, I'm excited to see someone else who is making logical assumptions to this extent you've come to. I was in the same process a while ago, trying to answer myself a question since the mainstream is more used to inventing forces and facts to match the data. Here enters CHARGE and charge is the re-d...
- Sun Oct 09, 2016 7:42 pm
- Forum: The Question of Fakery
- Topic: Physical π : Pi's relationship to 4
- Replies: 139
- Views: 168581
Re: Physical π : Pi's relationship to 4
Fair enough.
Can I kindly ask you to answer my question from previous post to you?
Can I kindly ask you to answer my question from previous post to you?
- Sun Oct 09, 2016 7:16 pm
- Forum: The Question of Fakery
- Topic: Physical π : Pi's relationship to 4
- Replies: 139
- Views: 168581
Re: Physical π : Pi's relationship to 4
Is it a typo ?daddie_o » October 9th, 2016, 7:32 pm wrote: In my response to mongo,....
- Sun Oct 09, 2016 7:13 pm
- Forum: The Question of Fakery
- Topic: Physical π : Pi's relationship to 4
- Replies: 139
- Views: 168581
Re: Physical π : Pi's relationship to 4
There absolutely is an appreciable lag - in both cases. At the first quarter mark, the circle path ball has travelled a quarter of a revolution of the circular path, and the straight path ball has travelled a quarter of the line from '0' to '4'. These two markers are not in any way equivalent in di...
- Sun Oct 09, 2016 5:50 am
- Forum: The Question of Fakery
- Topic: Physical π : Pi's relationship to 4
- Replies: 139
- Views: 168581
Re: Physical π : Pi's relationship to 4
Interesting enough you've mentioned debunkers. What seems to me is that most of people on CF that are perfectly able to comprehend the unthinkable deception, fakery and hoaxes on one hand, are completely unable to comprehend that physics (and science in general) is most probably faked and hoaxed in ...
- Sat Oct 08, 2016 7:54 pm
- Forum: The Question of Fakery
- Topic: Physical π : Pi's relationship to 4
- Replies: 139
- Views: 168581
Re: Physical π : Pi's relationship to 4
Gee, Kham, you offer so little yet so much with it. I'd be delighted if it was about science though. I'm seeing a lot of math being thrown around that has nothing to do with the issue at hand,… Obfuscation. The equation most often offered on this thread is 2*R*Pi , on one occasion there were the equ...
- Sat Oct 08, 2016 5:03 pm
- Forum: The Question of Fakery
- Topic: Physical π : Pi's relationship to 4
- Replies: 139
- Views: 168581
Re: Physical π : Pi's relationship to 4
I am still waiting for an answer to Simons question of how can a length of 21 billiard balls shrink down to a length of 17 billiard balls? Are you reading Simon's mind? It sure looks like it, or you're just putting words in his mouth he never pronounced himself.... I was accused of nitpicking and k...
- Sat Oct 08, 2016 9:35 am
- Forum: The Question of Fakery
- Topic: Physical π : Pi's relationship to 4
- Replies: 139
- Views: 168581
Re: Physical π : Pi's relationship to 4
Kham, there is a huge point you did not include when trying to explain what you call a math trick. If I quote Mathis again ( http://milesmathis.com/manh.pdf : Problem is, we have two variant methods of approaching the circle, one with polygons and one with steps. You would think they would converge ...
- Fri Oct 07, 2016 2:53 pm
- Forum: The Question of Fakery
- Topic: Physical π : Pi's relationship to 4
- Replies: 139
- Views: 168581
Re: Physical π : Pi's relationship to 4
I don't get it, honestly... you pointed to your picture with billiard balls, 21 vs 17 . If you by any chance see this a nitpicking, that was not my intention in any possible way. If I can I most certainly would take time and patience to try and help anybody. So, can I kindly ask you to rephrase your...
- Fri Oct 07, 2016 2:25 pm
- Forum: The Question of Fakery
- Topic: Physical π : Pi's relationship to 4
- Replies: 139
- Views: 168581
Re: Physical π : Pi's relationship to 4
Simon, I just got confused with your question.... :wacko: Why or what is it with the billiard balls that is in question? The only thing that is out of order with billiard balls (BB) is that the ratio between them isn't proper. I guess due to less accurate positioning you did. If in the first picture...