Oh, absolutely dear UNreal - your 3d Option is very good indeed - and goes hand in hand with my Option2. The only reason why I chose to focus on the mockery aspect (in my Option2) is because I can't imagine those NASA video-artists being unaware of the utter lameness & mediocrity of their animations. Therefore, I feel that their antics betray a strong component of arrogance and "in-your-face mockery" - seeing that they seemingly don't care 'getting caught' repeatedly inserting those inane, creepy winged bugs in their rocket launch animations.UNreal » September 7th, 2016, 12:28 am wrote:-
Maybe a 3d alternative ?
-
OPTION 3 : - The images of winged creatures passing in front of the camera lenses is a product of CGI enhancement meant to enhance the natural effect of the video and hence camouflage the fact that all the footage is CGI.The bugs are a proof of the mediocrity of NASA video-artists and poor 3d models.
Then again, I also once inserted a creepy winged insect in a home-made video of mine... but at least I'm not claiming it's a REAL animal !
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8WxIqYHymM