What's up with the apparent hole in the center of his forehead seen below (in the shape of a scuba-diving facemask), or the green-pixels square on his groin?simonshack wrote:
http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?i ... 9365.87336
What's up with the apparent hole in the center of his forehead seen below (in the shape of a scuba-diving facemask), or the green-pixels square on his groin?simonshack wrote:
Det må da være mulig å spamme ned dette idiotiske forumet her:
http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.ph ... start=2715
"That fool Simon Hytten or whatever his name is, has even managed to publish a picture of his own family. Go figure what they'll think of that, if they actually exist? But it's a fascinating freak show to follow, Cluesforum, that is."Den tullingen Simon Hytten eller hva han nå heter, har til og med klart å publisere et bilde av sin egen familie. Mon tro hva de synes om det, om de i det hele tatt eksisterer? Men det er er et fascinerende freakshow å følge. Cluesforum, altså.
Yes, you must only be a victim with a fuckface.com account to post photographs of your family!"That fool Simon Hytten or whatever his name is, has even managed to publish a picture of his own family. Go figure what they'll think of that, if they actually exist? But it's a fascinating freak show to follow, Cluesforum, that is."
Yes! Isn't it marvellously ironic?beyondafringe wrote:So, are you being accused, Simon, of doing what you/CF membership/I - accuse the fake victims of doing? (posting fake family photo's)
But the making of said accusations, while identifying you/CF/me as being 'crazy', is not the case in reverse?
I am not sure I elucidate coherently, even after several re-writes, so I non-rhetorically ask - do you understand what I'm trying to say?
The only rebuttal to the 'crazy' accusations of family and friend fakery, is a counter-accusation of family-fakery? F-d up.
Marvelously ironic, it is!simonshack wrote:
In other words, these opponents (of our efforts on this forum) could truly be labelled as "wacky conspiracy theorists"! They actually question my very existence - while attempting to ridicule our research on the basis of the very same paradigm!
Yeah, they are trying (very); but thank heavens some can still resist ithoi.polloi wrote:Tabloids... Inoculating and curing people of critical thinking since 1801.
So there we are: this is the background - not to call it the 'bloodline' - of the current Norwegian prime minister. Now just how close, you may ask, was Thorvald Stoltenberg with Jens Hauge? Well, as some Norwegian bloggers have it, he named his son after his old CIA 'mentor'..."I en dagbok skriver Hauge detaljert om atombyen, «et imponerende anlegg» som han godt vet formålet til. Men i en rapport til Utenriksdepartementet i 1961 skriver han om et uskyldig anlegg som han ikke besøkte: «Jeg besøkte ikke anlegget» skriver han."
http://www.tv2.no/nyheter/innenriks/hau ... 96628.html
"In a diary, Hauge wrote in detail about the atomtown, «an impressive plant» which he well knew the purpose of. But in a report to the Foreign Office Dept in 1961 he wrote about an innocent plant which he did not visit: «I never visited the plant» he wrote."
Gosh...Rudy Algera wrote:Interesting! A fictitious person wishes to study at the university of Oslo.
https://www.google.com/#bav=on.2,or.r_c ... rsity+oslo
You're welcome Makko - and thanks for pointing to that shameless article...Makkonen wrote:Thanks for the great summary of the thread, Simon.
It seems like this "event" will be milked for all eternity by the associates. Here is a new, shameless article: http://www.psykologtidsskriftet.no/inde ... 425120&a=3