9/11 SIMCITY

[simonshack]

The NBC Ball shot is most laughable video when compared to a scaled Boeing 767-200.

Yes, Equinox - the BALL is quite hilarious.

Today, I just happened to bump into the Youtube channel of "911TruthVideos". The guy is now "humbly apologetic about his initial support of the no plane theory"... To understand what I'm talking about, please first watch his video here - and read his comments in the video description: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B65M_smGewo (682.000+ views! )

I then took a closer look at the guy's (very blurry) version of NBC's clip of "Flight 175 striking WTC2". As you surely know, September Clues also features a blurry version of that clip - which shows some odd markers flickering up and down the left edge of WTC2. Now, this guy's version does NOT have these markers - but instead...



Just as a reminder, here's a gif of my an old version of that NBC clip (which I downloaded years ago from two different private VHS tapes of the 9/11 broadcasts) :


Anyhow - WHAT ARE THE ODDS of both these blurry versions showing 'funny things' going on with the left edge of WTC2? (Note: the current NBC archives do not feature the above oddities - but we have shown time and again how the current official archives have been 'cleansed' and re-edited. Watch my "FOXED OUT part1 & part2 on Youtube).

[Equinox]

Anyhow - WHAT ARE THE ODDS of both these blurry versions showing 'funny things' going on with the left edge of WTC2?

The NBC WTC is really shaky in the Nist footage even… It squirms and moves around… It stands out as fake easily.

9/11 Truth should really be asking… No matter what version Of the NBC footage they are looking it all comes down too this…. Is this footage fake? Can it be proven … Well lets look at the NBC plane and actually properly use the 3d model of the same aircraft!?


Step one – Grab the best Possible Shot available of the plane closest to the face of the Wtc to use as a size comparison... –

Zoomed/sharpened


2nd shot for clarity sake… Match up the plane in the footage, with the size of the 3d model which is actual size of the side of the WTC. (Like as you suggested in September clues.)


Whilst some of the actual other 2nd hit videos it comes up as reasonable match. The Plane in the NBC shot is no where close... It’s busted as a fake even in the finest of finest clarity available...

The speeds are just fantasy.

The airspeed of 400 knots at sea level is well outside the maximum operating speed of the Boeing 767-200 and therefore the perps would run the risk of either total structural failure or localized structural failures, namely wing fairings breaking off, engine cowlings breaking off, control surfaces breaking off or becoming inoperative and handling difficulties.

Above all it’s impossible for those speeds to be reached at that sea level.

The masking lines are really evident in the footage...




full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJi6ma7nrU8

[fbenario]

Page 29 of this thread takes far, far, FAR too long to load. No more please, I'm begging for mercy. (I've got the standard US speed of 6.0.)

Lock this page, we'll start page 30 of the thread.

[Equinox]

Just as a reminder, here's a gif of my old, blurry version of that NBC clip (which I remember downloading years ago from someone who had taped on VHS the 9/11 broadcasts). Yes, I know: I should have kept a record of that 'someone' - my bad!

I located and found the markers and are here mate..


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjUUSbWk60M

Hyper jump straight to it with this link--- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjUUSbWk60M#t=1m51s

[simonshack]

* Bumping to page 30

[simonshack]

* Bumping to page 30

[simonshack]

* Bumping to page 30

[fbenario]

Page 29 of this thread takes far, far, FAR too long to load. No more please, I'm begging for mercy. (I've got the standard U.S. speed of 6.0.)

Lock this page, we'll start page 30 of the thread.

Oh my god. Today when I opened this thread on the current page (unfortunately still page 29, thanks for trying Simon, but your efforts didn't work) it froze my computer completely for 15 minutes, and I had to do a hard shut-down. It is now the worst page in the history of the forum, and obviously now the longest time to load.

Unfortunately, to my computer this page is now malware.

Equinox, how could you possibly post even more images/videos after reading my prior June 23 comment? I know to a nearly 100% certainty that you are a good guy and a highly valued member of this forum by many of us, and this doesn't affect any of that. Why did you do this?

Admins, I don't think you have any more choice. Please do whatever it takes to lock this page forevermore, and start page 30.

[fbenario]

Wow, it looks as if my prior post itself started page 30. Thank God.

Is there a way to post a warning about page 29?

[Equinox]

I took all the gifs and should run fine, sorry about not noticing your post before I was on my way out the door and only had 2 seconds to post up.... Anyway it should run fine now

[simonshack]

Wow, it looks as if my prior post itself started page 30. Thank God.

Is there a way to post a warning about page 29?

Dear FredB,

It must be some issue on your side. I've trimmed page 29 a little - and it now opens & uploads all gifs and pics in less than 10 seconds for me.

[sentientlinergy]

Freeze! Give me all your tapes!


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uv87j-e8w7A

[diagonal2]

Freeze! Give me all your tapes!


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uv87j-e8w7A

03:02
Proof that they used missiles... and proof that the entire thing was a hoax, props to whoever released this tape.

[Equinox]

Freeze! Give me all your tapes!


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uv87j-e8w7A

03:02
Proof that they used missiles... and proof that the entire thing was a hoax, props to whoever released this tape.

Its just trying to use video footage as evidence to support a “theory” that missiles were used on 9/11. By looking at the explosions of the world trade centre on 9/11 and to assert with the video footage,that missiles were used.

Well truth of the matter is, we have gone through ALL of those videos that were featured in that movie, and found there lies a pile of flaws that is higher than any theory to do with missile... The footage is fake and made in a studio… Simon looked at the missile theory many years ago, with September clues.. and much of us have looked at it later in the past year or so…

Is it logical missiles were used? Well in my mind … YES (and more than likely were) .. BUT…. At the end of the day. To be correct It’s a fair call to state we cannot make any assessment off what hit the Trade Centre, because there is more than enough flaws in the footage that gives more than enough reason to state it is fake..

Here are just three found in some of those videos posted… I can get the rest if you need more..
As all of those videos in that movie are just fakes...

http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f= ... 0#p2368341





Cheers
Eq

[diagonal2]

The missile theory is plausible: http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/bomber/acm.htm

It could explain why the "air plane" was so small, cruise missiles are small and look very much like a plane.

http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/bombe ... 29a_01.jpg
http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/bombe ... 29a_02.jpg

Didn't the "air plane" fly up-side down in one of the vidoes?

It looked very much like this: http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/bomber/acm_03.gif

!