"FALLING MAN" - the phony jumpers

The notion of 'thousands of victims' was crucial to generate universal public outrage. However, having 3000 angry families breathing down their necks was never part of the perps' demented plan. Our ongoing analyses and investigations suggest that NO one died on 9/11.

Re: FALLING MAN

Postby Equinox on April 22nd, 2012, 11:41 am

reel.deal wrote: funny you should mention it EQ; where did you get this ?
i just found that shot couple days ago while looking for
Tannenbaum 'survivors' shots...
2011, hmm ?...
looks like a new bunch of
HD 2011 remix jumpers, to me...
<_<




;)


Heya Reel Its a shot a grabbed from the above video you provided. It looks like we are both looking at the Tannenbaum footage. I have been looking at the imagery ever since the member Yankee showed up here. So what do you think of it. I seem to notice some sort of pixel cloud around the jumper.
Equinox
Member
 
Posts: 549
Joined: October 14th, 2010, 9:45 am

Re: FALLING MAN

Postby simonshack on April 22nd, 2012, 12:14 pm

simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6432
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: FALLING MAN

Postby IwasBettyOng on April 23rd, 2012, 1:09 am

What total crap the Esquire article is. I've studied this photo and, if you turn it upside down, it looks like someone jogging. The picture is so obviously faked.

What puzzles me is where was Richard Drew when he took this photo ? I guess we'll never know.
IwasBettyOng
Newbie
 
Posts: 9
Joined: April 19th, 2012, 12:09 am

Re: FALLING MAN

Postby Maat on May 1st, 2012, 10:53 am

Reel, have you seen this one before? Just found it in a Google search for 911 wtc images :rolleyes:

Image
@ http://barenakedislam.com/2011/09/10/91 ... er-forget/
No "photographer" or source credited, only this modification info per Exif data:

Modify date: 2010:08:15 04:22:58
Artist: Watts, Susan
Software: Adobe Photoshop CS4 Windows

And what the hell is going on with the 'building' façades here? :wacko:
Image
No data on it at all.
Maat
Moderator
 
Posts: 1423
Joined: September 9th, 2010, 2:14 am

Re: FALLING MAN

Postby truthseeker on May 1st, 2012, 3:43 pm

Maat wrote:Reel, have you seen this one before? Just found it in a Google search for 911 wtc images :rolleyes:

Image
@ http://barenakedislam.com/2011/09/10/91 ... er-forget/
No "photographer" or source credited, only this modification info per Exif data:

Modify date: 2010:08:15 04:22:58
Artist: Watts, Susan
Software: Adobe Photoshop CS4 Windows

And what the hell is going on with the 'building' façades here? :wacko:
Image
No data on it at all.

Is it enough just to post a jumper photo? Give me some critique ! Of the fake photo. I know it,s fake. BUT!
Tell us what makes it fake. Is not that the purpose of the forum?
Thanks... Truthseeker.
truthseeker
Member
 
Posts: 85
Joined: June 30th, 2011, 8:51 pm

Re: FALLING MAN

Postby Equinox on May 1st, 2012, 4:23 pm

Is it enough just to post a jumper photo? Give me some critique ! Of the fake photo. I know it,s fake. BUT!
Tell us what makes it fake. Is not that the purpose of the forum?
Thanks... Truthseeker.


Truthseeker you may have misunderstood... The forum member Maat was displaying the photo. As more of a question from our member Reel deal as that member has covered alot of the Jumper footage.

That is why " maat" asked and quote "
Reel, have you seen this one before? Just found it in a Google search for 911 wtc images


He was asking another member about some pictures he found, if they had any analysis on them...probably to save them being looked at over and over again if they have. Something I also do a fair bit of with reel deal.
Cheers EQ :)
Equinox
Member
 
Posts: 549
Joined: October 14th, 2010, 9:45 am

Re: FALLING MAN

Postby Equinox on May 1st, 2012, 5:40 pm

reel.deal wrote:Image
last time i jumped out the 98th floor of a skyscraper, i too took several precautions
before 'taking the plunge'. i spent 20 minutes bashing out all the jagged edge glass
in the window frame, just so i wouldnt cut myself & bleed everywhere. then i sat back
at my desk so i wouldnt dirty my brand new cream chinos with smoke, then i took my
shoes off cause they were new & my mrs would kill me if i got all burning kerosene
on them, but my feet didnt get burned or dirty at all. i was also in an immaculate
pristine condition last time i dived out of a towering inferno... no cuts, no blood,
no torn clothing, no dirt, no smoke, no sweat, no shoes, clean feet & ankles, chinos
...
no problem.
:huh:



Hey mate, same... when free falling of the 98th floor... I always try too "look my best" when looking directly at the camera all the way dooowwn on the street. :lol: :P
Equinox
Member
 
Posts: 549
Joined: October 14th, 2010, 9:45 am

Re: FALLING MAN

Postby Maat on May 1st, 2012, 6:33 pm

Equinox wrote:
truthseeker wrote:Is it enough just to post a jumper photo? Give me some critique ! Of the fake photo. I know it,s fake. BUT!
Tell us what makes it fake. Is not that the purpose of the forum?
Thanks... Truthseeker.


Truthseeker you may have misunderstood... The forum member Maat was displaying the photo. As more of a question from our member Reel deal as that member has covered alot of the Jumper footage.

That is why " maat" asked and quote "
Reel, have you seen this one before? Just found it in a Google search for 911 wtc images


...was asking another member ... if they had any analysis on them...probably to save them being looked at over and over again if they have. Something I also do a fair bit of with reel deal.
Cheers EQ :)

Exactly, EQ :) Thanks! Although I couldn't recall seeing it posted before, I didn't want to presume and rehash any of Reel's excellent work — 'cause I'm a lady, I am Image

reel.deal wrote:last time i jumped out the 98th floor of a skyscraper, i too took several precautions
before 'taking the plunge'. i spent 20 minutes bashing out all the jagged edge glass
in the window frame, just so i wouldnt cut myself & bleed everywhere. then i sat back
at my desk so i wouldnt dirty my brand new cream chinos with smoke, then i took my
shoes off cause they were new & my mrs would kill me if i got all burning kerosene
on them, but my feet didnt get burned or dirty at all. i was also in an immaculate
pristine condition last time i dived out of a towering inferno... no cuts, no blood,
no torn clothing, no dirt, no smoke, no sweat, no shoes, clean feet & ankles, chinos...

no problem. :huh:

:lol: Yep, that 'barefoot' thing with these shoops has always puzzled me — how & why would/could anyone 'lose' or 'remove' their shoes (& socks!) to supposedly scramble over blasted, smoking, hot metal, wood & glass to 'jump' from an opening? It's totally nucking futs :rolleyes:

Of course I realize they expected their 9-11 'blockbuster' to 'blow our socks off', but that's ridiculous! :lol:
Maat
Moderator
 
Posts: 1423
Joined: September 9th, 2010, 2:14 am

Re: FALLING MAN

Postby lux on May 1st, 2012, 9:00 pm

I find it odd that these figures are always shown so far away from the building.

I mean, wouldn't some at least attempt to cling to the sides of the building as they dropped in some desperate hope that they might avoid plunging to certain death? Why leap away from the building? It seems to contradict basic self-preservation behavior.
lux
Member
 
Posts: 1914
Joined: October 1st, 2011, 11:46 pm

Re: FALLING MAN

Postby MrSinclair on May 2nd, 2012, 3:31 am

It is a real photo, I remember an interview with Barbie talking about Ken being missing. :P
MrSinclair
Member
 
Posts: 389
Joined: December 23rd, 2011, 2:29 am

Re: FALLING MAN

Postby pov603 on May 2nd, 2012, 8:08 pm

Pity the poor lost soles...
pov603
Member
 
Posts: 737
Joined: June 30th, 2011, 9:02 pm

Re: FALLING MAN - A Tribute

Postby XQB on May 7th, 2012, 7:52 am

Each time I lace up my Jordans, I observe a moment of silence in honor of Mr. Jumpman who tragically fell to his gruesome death on 9/11. Maybe Mr. Jumpan really thought he could fly? Poor guy.

Image
XQB
Member
 
Posts: 62
Joined: April 23rd, 2012, 7:43 am

Re: FALLING MAN

Postby CTGal1011 on May 8th, 2012, 2:23 pm

Chino pant guy's positioning reminds me of someone going down one of those massive slides at your local carney.
Or a total non athlete on a trampoline. Oooo, maybe bouncing inside one of those kiddy blow up houses you see at rich 5 year old's birthday party.
CTGal1011
Member
 
Posts: 97
Joined: March 13th, 2012, 5:02 pm

Re: 9/11 Memorial Scams, Vicsims, Etc

Postby burlington on May 12th, 2012, 10:58 pm

Hi, I'm new here. I've done my intro, and now I'd like to show you my examination of "the falling man". (I hope I am not repeating what someone else already found!)

If you were told a photo of a man falling might be your relative, wouldn't you turn it upside down, to really get a good look at him? What do you notice about his right arm(s), his shoulder and his bottom when he is turned right-side-up?

Image
By losarahk at 2012-05-12

On the photo below I have circled the white, bare arm that hangs right behind the jacketed arm. At first I thought he had been cropped from a photo where someone had their arm around him, but then I realized that the bare arm was the REAL arm, which rested casually on the bent leg. There is also something under his behind with a piece of silver pole. Assuming publishers had a much bigger version of the photo, why didn't they spot the bad photo-shopping, eh?

Image
By losarahk at 2012-05-12

Realizing the person underneath the photoshopped torso and head had a white arm and a short-sleeved dark top on, I coloured over the light jacket to recreate the short sleeved top. As soon as I did, it became obvious to me that the leg positions were explained by the resting position of the real right hand. Whoever that person was, they were sitting casually, with one foot higher than another, as if resting on the rung of a stool or chair. I added (loosely) a stool and replaced the missing foot, which I think was cropped by accident, or to make his sitting posture less obvious.

Image
By losarahk at 2012-05-12
burlington
Member
 
Posts: 18
Joined: May 12th, 2012, 10:03 pm

Re: 9/11 Memorial Scams, Vicsims, Etc

Postby Maat on May 13th, 2012, 1:19 am

burlington wrote:Hi, I'm new here. I've done my intro, and now I'd like to show you my examination of "the falling man". (I hope I am not repeating what someone else already found!)

If you were told a photo of a man falling might be your relative, wouldn't you turn it upside down, to really get a good look at him? What do you notice about his right arm(s), his shoulder and his bottom when he is turned right-side-up?

Hi burlington, welcome to the forum :) Thank you for sharing your thoughtful insights.

To see what has already been discussed on this subject, you can search [see upper right] and read the relevant posts in the Falling Man topic.

That image is only one frame of the 'fall' sequence credited to 'photographer' Richard Drew, ref:
viewtopic.php?p=2348886#p2348886

The source link to the site page an original image was found is preferred (i.e. the hosting site for your annotated analyses etc. is not necessary as it's already on the image url ). Thanks.
Maat
Moderator
 
Posts: 1423
Joined: September 9th, 2010, 2:14 am

PreviousNext

Return to VICSIMS: the simulated victims of 9/11

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests