reel.deal wrote:EquinoX... this was a PM but you got PM blocked, so putting this here, hope you dig !
Lovin' the video deception thread you got going on LetsRoll, props to ya dude!
I have an addition that i would love to see Matt (911ConspiracyTV / 911CTV)
try and talk his way out of !!!
Ask him to make another youtube debunk-vid out of this one ! ...hahaha !!!
from a German Documentary that examines OBVIOUS BLATANT "LIVE" 9/11 CGI-NY, on CNN...
originally linked on RealityShack by Lyrix...
I made the gif... this is killer !!!
GAME OVER !!!
WHATS THIS THEN ? ...'REAL-TIME' 'LIVE BROADCAST' ...NOT CGI-NY NO WAY ?
NOT A 'LIVE' 'REAL-TIME' CNN CGI-NYC MASK-LAYER ? ...SO ITS 'REAL LIVE 9/11 (1/2 GONE !!!) NYC' ?!?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fu7z0zaYKw ...@ 2:47 > 3:34
"... I SAW THIS CGI HALF-MANHATTAN COME OUT OF NOWHERE AND JUST REAM RIGHT UP TO THE SITE OF THE CGI-TOWERS, RE-COMPOSITING THROUGH THE OTHER SIDE, AND THEN I WITNESSED CGI HALF-MANHATTAN COLLAPSE, ONE FIRST AND THEN THE SECOND, MOSTLY DUE TO CGI COMPOSITE-LAYER STRUCTURAL FAILURE, BECAUSE THE CGI HALF-MANHATTAN COMPOSITE-LAYER WAS JUST TOO EVIDENT... "
Reel, I had a break from 9/11 but I’m back. I was just to busy with my own life… But I never ever gave up on this… And now my break is finished, More enthused than ever and I can function a whole heap better on this now. I only have noticed this post addressed to me back just under 1 year ago to date.
Yes this, find is killa! Nice work playa!
It’s a real great find. And I am going to reference and also mirror what I see you are demonstrating.
Of course it has to be CGI 100%. I could delve deeper into this monstrous forgery. But the principles and parameters of this find are quite evident.
So as there in an apparent zoom out in the CNN footage. An observation is made @ aprox... @ 3.06 a static glitch of indefinite duration makes a Visual physical appearance. At the bottom of the Zoom out.
The observation to make to determine the hypothesis that this is actually computer generated imagery. Is the fact that whilst the bottom section of the actual shot has paused and no longer working. The actual concurrent zoom (reverse) is still taking place. Whilst this is concurrently occurring the actual picture is remains static.
Static visual computer generated composites are simplistic in making, and a glitch can quite often occur, proving the fraud of the computer generated imagery. Quite often Hollywood fake camera zoom- in are used to attribute a real life scenario to the fake computer generated composite.
In the CNN a zoom out is taken place, as the actual shot is view of the shot is moving backwards in concurrence with the zoom.
However it is observed that the glitch occurs at the bottom of the screen. But in stead of the glitch canceling the shot all together. The Actually Zoom out continues actually zooming out on the glitch.
This does defiantly not make and sense of a real camera as the reverse zoom and the visual aspect of the shot would be working in sync considering the alleged shot would have been live.
A further zoom back of the glitch does not make any logical sense and a conclusion that actual footage is not real world but is instead computer generated imagery, obviously prefabricated at an earlier point in time and being shown live on TV as a current real world visual recording.
REEL and Simon (n others) please keep on contributing great amazing finds such as these. I will archive and put them to good use.
Source--- CNN Sept. 11, 2001 9.29 am - 10.11 am @ 3.07 minutes.