Kentrailer wrote:I agree that there is fakery taking place, but in this series of videos, I'm trying to initiate the layman to the trickery without using some terms "vicsim".. it turns off a lot of people (but it's true). I am not sure "Jarred Lee Loughner is 100% vicsim, he may have been based on an actual reclusive guy from about 2.5 years ago). I think Tucson used a lot of actors, and some CGI.
I suppose you mean to say that Loughner was not 100% a simulated identity (as the term "vicsim" applies, obviously, to fake victims and not to anything else that is fake). Unfortunately, there is nothing to back up this claim of yours. And if you have some sort of evidence in this sense, you are warmly invited to share it with us, so that (very likely) we can tear it to pieces.
The fact that a fake identity borrows elements from reality is normal, always happens, and doesn't make the identity any less fake. There is no percentage to fakery in this sense. Loughner pictures are utterly faked, and his absence from the world scene equates to Breivik's absence. All evidence and lack thereof points to these entities being completely artificial, and with very little material to them.
No, all I'm saying is, I'm not totally sure.. are you 100% sure he couldn't have been a real person (maybe not named loughner) at some point in time?
If you ever watch football- You don't want to run the same play over and over again. It becomes very predictable. Same thing applies to these psycopaths doing these ops. you want to mix it up a bit- otherwise your magic tricks stop working. I am probably 90% sure he's 100% simulated, however, to the layman being introduced to the topic it's easier to show that the images are photoshopped and that the whole story stinks.
What I am 10% thinking is a possibility though is- that at one point in time there was a guy who may have or may have not been named Loughner. Said person could have been abducted and introduced into some sort of mind control program, or simply drugged and dropped off at the scene of the shooting to be framed.
I did say the Loughner pictures were photoshopped, meaning they aren't real. If you have watched my Anders Breivik videos, I pointed out who he was a faked identity, because I had absolute proof. With this Loughner character, I haven't seen absolute proof yet (besides the fact that it looks like he is), so I don't want to go there.
I will let the viewer research on their own further and draw their own conclusions about whether or not Loughner is completely fake, or just the photos have been photoshopped of him in the last 3 years or so. There appear to be a number of people interviewed who say they knew him.. but 2.5 or 3 years ago.. nobody who knew him recently. This is probably just part of their fake story, but, because I can't prove it completely yet with the evidence collected
I do find it very telling that "Loughner's" parents have not been seen, and have effectively been in hiding ever since this started (probably not real people) only to emerge wearing sunglasses:
Anyway, sorry if you misunderstood me. I just know a lot of things do not add up about the story, and I am trying to show the points which can be proven to contradict, instead of putting myself out on a limb saying he's never existed.
I think the most important thing is getting people to actually look into these events.. To look at the actual things that you can prove and actually uploading things on YouTube or other video sharing sites (where a large audience can be reached). I hope you nonhocapito can show me up, and make a convincing video for people to see that shows he's 100% digital. Please make your own video of the topic, and give it some good tags, and get it out there. I thought I did a pretty good job.