THE "CHATBOX"

[reel.deal]

.

[SmokingGunII]

Simon, remember the mails we had re Naudet analysis by Leslie Raphael? Well, he has just appeared on a related thread over at LR, where I notice you are still active.

http://letsrollforums.com/proof-naudet- ... 911p2.html

Perhaps it is worth asking him whether he thinks a plane still hit the towers?

No need now Simon - Heiwa's already obliged!

[simonshack]

Simon, remember the mails we had re Naudet analysis by Leslie Raphael? Well, he has just appeared on a related thread over at LR, where I notice you are still active.

http://letsrollforums.com/proof-naudet- ... 911p2.html

Perhaps it is worth asking him whether he thinks a plane still hit the towers?

No need now Simon - Heiwa's already obliged!

I am actually quite curious to see how Leslie Raphael will reply to Heiwa's simple questions. Let's wait and see.

[brianv]

I would ask him too, if he thought it was possible that it was shot in a Model Studio like this one?




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsfzAvOrjrc

[SmokingGunII]

Leslie Raphael's answers to Heiwa at LR:

I have some simple questions here:
1. Do you really think airplanes collided with WTC1/2 on 911?
2. If you refer to various footage of planes colliding with WTCs, do you think the footage is real?
3. Have you ever heard of propaganda, planting false info in the mind of people?
4. Do you think skyscrapers globally collapse into a little rubble heap by gravity after a little fire up top?

In a PM I have got the following answers from Les:
1. Yes I do - on balance.
2. Yes.
3. Yes - the official 9/11 story, for example.
4. No


1. Not sure I know he means?
2. Oh dear.
3. That's good.
4. Excellent answer.

Now, Heiwa, if he believes, on balance, that planes hit the twin towers and the aluminium wings managed to cut through steel beams, can he explain why the softest part of the plane ( the nose cone) managed to smash through the reinforced Pentagon walls, whilst the strongest parts (the engines) never even scratched the surface and in fact, were nowhere to be seen on the lawn?

[Heiwa]

Now, Heiwa, if he believes, on balance, that planes hit the twin towers and the aluminium wings managed to cut through steel beams, can he explain why the softest part of the plane ( the nose cone) managed to smash through the reinforced Pentagon walls, whilst the strongest parts (the engines) never even scratched the surface and in fact, were nowhere to be seen on the lawn?

I asked him in a polite way ... and no reply so far. But he lives at some remote village in Scotland and is maybe snowed in? Global warming?

[simonshack]

Leslie Raphael's answers to Heiwa at LR:

HEIWA ASKED
I have some simple questions here:
1. Do you really think airplanes collided with WTC1/2 on 911?
2. If you refer to various footage of planes colliding with WTCs, do you think the footage is real?
3. Have you ever heard of propaganda, planting false info in the mind of people?
4. Do you think skyscrapers globally collapse into a little rubble heap by gravity after a little fire up top?

LES RAPHAEL ANSWERED:
1. Yes I do - on balance.
2. Yes.
3. Yes - the official 9/11 story, for example.
4. No

Heiwa's question:
2. If you refer to various footage of planes colliding with WTCs, do you think the footage is real?

Leslie Raphael's reply:
2. Yes.

This is most interesting. So Leslie Raphael actually believes the 9/11 footage (of the Naudet brothers and all) is REAL AND LEGIT?

Interesting - to say the least ! We might need to dig out Leslie from the snow!

[jaytotale]

.

[maggie]

This parody of the film "Incredibly Loud and Extremely Close" struck me as very funny:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNV8JGyiQuA

It isn't research material as such, so I hope it's okay to park this here.

[muckletoon]

.

[pov603]

This parody of the film "Incredibly Loud and Extremely Close" struck me as very funny:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNV8JGyiQuA

It isn't research material as such, so I hope it's okay to park this here.

Very funny and hopefully informative to some of those who still remain oblivious to what really happened!

[hoi.polloi]

Wow Tom Hanks loves him some jingoistic sympathy-propaganda shit. What is this - like the fourth or fifth movie he's done about 9/11 and the Moon Landings from the propaganda perspective?

[nonhocapito]

Wow Tom Hanks loves him some jingoistic sympathy-propaganda shit. What is this - like the fourth or fifth movie he's done about 9/11 and the Moon Landings from the propaganda perspective?

On the subject: http://perezhilton.com/2012-01-21-extre ... yRJvuSy5Wf
video: http://landing.newsinc.com/shared/video ... D=23563588

I have that book somewhere waiting to be read, by the way, from before I knew it was even about 9/11. But I guess I'll just skip through the movie now, who needs the grief?

[pov603]

At least we now know who the perps are on about when they give THanks.

[SmokingGunII]

Wow. Synchronicity. Today I sat down with my children to watch Toy Story 2. Featuring the voices of Tom Hanks (Woody), John Ratzenburger (Ham) & the additional voice of Kelsey Grammar (Stinky Pete)!

It seems these guys move in the same circles.