Reel - Is that supposed to be "another" engine part that's smashed through the sidewalk?
Seriously- is it??? At what purported location?
The photographer looks up, at the... WTC....?
The sidewalk paving slab is gone completely
. A missing horizontal plane...as it were.
What vertical edge is visible, bounded by the two down-arrows? The paving stone thickness is too deep to be a cast concrete artifice, so is it an edging stone? There is a suggestion that the sidewalk slab behind the engine-impacted one is also missing. Or is it meant to be a square manhole cover? An impact trajectory towards us would have displaced the slabs in front
of it, in a ripple. Assuming earth or sand under the slabs, where is the ejected material?
Where was the jeans-walker's previous step-pace starting-point for his right foot? His gait is wrong- a natural swing is always
limb-opposed, left arm with right leg, right arm with left jeg. And this would be explained by him carrying cases...is that really a pair of caseless handles he's got in each hand...and isn't his right leg 'edged' by a missing something? (see my dotted vertical leg-line)
How can this picture be so...oddly flawed? Is it a deliberate misdirection?
I cannot tolerate being lied to ineffectvely- I want the reality that's being sold to me to be realistic
fgs! There's nothing worse than patronising propaganda....
(ps also...are these orphan shoes *never* in pairs???? I did think the two on the street, bounded by the white line, might have been brother+sister....but maybe not..)
(pps also.....the green 'man-bag' slung over the officer's pistol holster...what??)
- no, tell me I'm wrong... the relative location of this debris....it's just like the one at Murray+Church!
Say 15m up from a street junction. Close to the sidewalk edge. Beside/impacting a pedestrian crossing.....!?!
Where did this picture come from? What is the stated location?? [/edit]