Major Damning evidence against Luke Rudkowski

[nonhocapito]

http://cryptome.org/0002/luke-rudkowski.htm

not that I am surprised...

[simonshack]

*
Very interesting indeed. So it's really "LUKASZ" ? Lukasz Rudowski?

When a donation is made the receipt says donation to Lukasz Rudkowski.
http://cryptome.org/0002/luke-rudkowski.htm"

When I found "Lukasz Milewski" in the CNN memorial, I theorized that he was a 'humorous' alter ego of Luke Rudowski:
LUKASZ MILEWSKI (2001?) ----------------- LUKASZ RUDOWSKI (2009?)



http://edition.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/me ... /3664.html"

At the time, I pointed out this fact :

This is what "MILE"means in Polish:

1."pleasantly"
2."kindly"
3."affably"
4."heartily"

MILEWSKI - RUDOWSKI ....get it ? :P B)

Nice boy vs Rude boy.

Of course, there still remained the difference between the first name "Lukasz" and "Luke".
But now we know that Luke Rudowski's real first name is in fact "Lukasz" (just as "Lukasz Milewski").

Here's Lukasz Milewski's phony story as told on Legacy/CNN:

His First Job in America

On July 11, Lukasz Milewski landed in the United States for the first time. His parents, who immigrated from Poland to New York City just a year ago, had left him and his sister, Kamila Milewska, behind to finish college.

Mr. Milewski, 21, found a summer job serving food at the Cantor Fitzgerald canteen. "He was the only Polish guy, and soon everybody knew him," said Ms. Milewska, who had come to the United States with her brother. "He was the best brother in the world. Last year, we only had each other. When I broke up with my boyfriend of six years, only he could find a way to help me. He told me that life was too short to worry."

Proud to be working in the World Trade Center, Mr. Lukasz sent many photos of himself in front of the towers to his girlfriend in Poland. He told his sister that he would keep going to school and find a permanent job in the trade center.

The family is returning to Poland this month to plan for his funeral. "We will put in the coffin his favorite CDs and T-shirts, letters from me, his girlfriend and our parents, photos and teddy bears," Ms. Milewska said. "In a way, I don't want them to find his body. I want to remember him handsome and smiling."

http://www.legacy.com/Sept11/Story.aspx?PersonID=126367

This whole affair is just a massive, pathetic joke.

[hoi.polloi]

Nicely encapsulated gents.

[nonhocapito]

Here is an email I just sent to Cryptome (just in case they are honestly interested in the matter, you never know):

Dear Cryptome,

since you are looking into the matter of Lukasz Rudkowski, it might interests you that one alias to Rudkowski is also listed among the 9/11 victims.

All evidence points to the fact that Rudkowski's identity has been used to "create" 9/11 victim "Lukasz Milewski". Unless you want to call a coincidence the slightly morphed image and the slightly changed name:

http://edition.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/me ... /3664.html

http://www.legacy.com/Sept11/Story.aspx?PersonID=126367

Many other protagonists of the 9/11 "truth movement" seem to be strangely featured among the 9/11 victims, with morphed photos or modified names.

Maybe it is about time for Cryptome to look into the lists: to see how many of the names and identities listed are real, and how many are in fact vic-sims: simulated victims used in a giant money-making scam.

http://septemberclues.info/vicsims_photo-analyses.htm

[warning: knowledge of photoshop trickery required to digest the above info]

Sincerely,
nonhocapito

will keep you posted on possible replies.

[brianv]

Cryptome is spook central. I'll be very surprised if they come back to you at all! Who knows? Stranger things have happened at sea!

[creat3d]

Hi,
I'm the one that sent the article to Cryptome, hoping Mr. Young would post it.
I do not know if he is personally looking into it.

This is a video I have released today to sort of summarize things up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUvgWaoo0GQ


The documents have been downloaded less than 90 times at the moment... while hundreds of people are accusing us of making this up, being cointelpro, shills etc...

Thanks for not dismissing it right off the bat.

[simonshack]

Hi,
I'm the one that sent the article to Cryptome, hoping Mr. Young would post it.

Hi creat3d,

Love your screen name. :)

I take it that you're aware of the evidence provided by our research - that the narrative of the 9/11 event is basically upheld by 3d creations - and that the 9/11 victims are fictitious identities generated with digital means. Surely, you know now that a 21-year-old "Lukasz Milewski" supposedly died in the WTC towers. You must also have noticed his resemblance to Lukasz Rudowski (or "Rudkowski" - depending on which articles you read).

Thanks for commenting/responding cogently in relation to the facts listed above - and for not dismissing them right off the bat.

Perhaps you could also ask "Lukasz Rudowski" if he has ever heard of "Lukasz Milewski". By the way, do you know how old "Lukas R" is supposed to be? Was he 21 years old in 2001, by any chance?

[Equinox]

Conversation taken from here... http://letsrollforums.com/9-11-worlds-b ... 24585.html

24th June he was in the Netherlands, someone from here has seen him.

Sure like to know his findings?!?!

Well I am the one who met Luke Milewski/Rudkowski over here in the Netherlands. I went to the Architects and engineers for 9/11 "truth" presentation by Richard Gage. (who is obvious controlled opposition)

When I arrived at the "crime scene" I was shocked to see Luke sitting outside smoking a cigarette. I couldn't believe my eyes but it really was the (in)famous Luke, the founder of We are change. I immediately walked up to him to ask him some question about Tv Fakery. At first I just introduced myself and asked him some regular questions so he thought I was part of his groupie like followers. He said he was 24 years old which I couldn't believe for a second. He told me he's doing this for 8 years so that means he was at the age of 16 starting with his activism. That is not impossible but to me that seems very far fetched.

When I started to ask him some serious question he immediately changed his attitude; he wasn't so eager talking to me anymore. According to Luke, WAC and Alex Jones are not censoring Tv Fakery; they just don't talk about it.
Luke said he did not care about Tv Fakery because he's a "journalist" and activist now.
Luke thinks it's only important that people know about 9/11 being an inside job and the all the "theories" don't matter. This to me is a big red flag; that's gatekeeping.
He replied in the same manner when I asked him about his buddy Richard Gage and Steven "Los Alamos" Jones.

After that I asked Luke about the 9/11 "victim" Lukasz Milewski who is, in my opinion, an obvious morph of Lukasw Rudowski.
Luke immediately started to laugh and he right away knew what I was talking about. There were some people listening in to our conversation so Luke decided to ridicule me in front of those people. He told them I was asking some crazy questions and laughed it off. He than started using straw man arguments like his daddy Alex Jones taught him to do.

That made me decide to call him out for what he is; a shill. I asked whether he really was 24 years old. At that point I just knew he wasn't; he didn't dare looking me straight into the eyes anymore. I could tell by his reaction that he was caught in a lie. On his youtube channel it says he's 31 years old. That's of course no solid proof but to me that's closer to the truth than Luke claiming to be 24 years old. Besides, why would he make such a big deal out of his age if he hasn't got anything to hide?

I was already convinced about Luke being a shill. After meeting him in person my opinion about Luke being a phony has only become stronger.
I wanted to write a short reaction but it turned out bigger that I had anticipated[/code]

[CryptoAnarchist]

Conversation taken from here... http://letsrollforums.com/9-11-worlds-b ... 24585.html

24th June he was in the Netherlands, someone from here has seen him.

Sure like to know his findings?!?!

Well I am the one who met Luke Milewski/Rudkowski over here in the Netherlands. I went to the Architects and engineers for 9/11 "truth" presentation by Richard Gage. (who is obvious controlled opposition)

When I arrived at the "crime scene" I was shocked to see Luke sitting outside smoking a cigarette. I couldn't believe my eyes but it really was the (in)famous Luke, the founder of We are change. I immediately walked up to him to ask him some question about Tv Fakery. At first I just introduced myself and asked him some regular questions so he thought I was part of his groupie like followers. He said he was 24 years old which I couldn't believe for a second. He told me he's doing this for 8 years so that means he was at the age of 16 starting with his activism. That is not impossible but to me that seems very far fetched.

When I started to ask him some serious question he immediately changed his attitude; he wasn't so eager talking to me anymore. According to Luke, WAC and Alex Jones are not censoring Tv Fakery; they just don't talk about it.
Luke said he did not care about Tv Fakery because he's a "journalist" and activist now.
Luke thinks it's only important that people know about 9/11 being an inside job and the all the "theories" don't matter. This to me is a big red flag; that's gatekeeping.
He replied in the same manner when I asked him about his buddy Richard Gage and Steven "Los Alamos" Jones.

After that I asked Luke about the 9/11 "victim" Lukasz Milewski who is, in my opinion, an obvious morph of Lukasw Rudowski.
Luke immediately started to laugh and he right away knew what I was talking about. There were some people listening in to our conversation so Luke decided to ridicule me in front of those people. He told them I was asking some crazy questions and laughed it off. He than started using straw man arguments like his daddy Alex Jones taught him to do.

That made me decide to call him out for what he is; a shill. I asked whether he really was 24 years old. At that point I just knew he wasn't; he didn't dare looking me straight into the eyes anymore. I could tell by his reaction that he was caught in a lie. On his youtube channel it says he's 31 years old. That's ofcourse no solid proof but to me that's closer to the truth than Luke claiming to be 24 years old. Besides, why would he make such a big deal out of his age if he hasn't got anything to hide?

I was already convinced about Luke being a shill. After meeting him in person my opinion about Luke being a phony has only become stronger.
I wanted to write a short reaction but it turned out bigger that I had anticipated[/code]

Whoa! Take a look at the end of that thread on the Let's Roll blog: http://letsrollforums.com/9-11-worlds-biggest-t24585p3.html

Now tell me the moderator didn't use the same face photo glued onto different bodies. Is he kidding?!?!

[maggie]

Luke is absolutely a shill because anyone in the spotlight, like him, Alex Jones, just anyone resisting the New World Order movement are feeding the Beast of reaction to the relentless movement toward the NWO agenda, just playing into the hands of a movement to replace existing governments with more draconian ones.
The Occupy Anything movement is all part of the scenario to ensure more crackdowns on people, and to have any population screaming to accept anything offering better than the disorder existing now: Order Out of Chaos.

[simonshack]

Conversation taken from here... http://letsrollforums.com/9-11-worlds-b ... 24585.html

Just to put the record straight regarding the Milewski/Rudowski finding.

I first posted this - back in September 16, 2010:
MILEWSKI/RUD(k)OWSKI http://z6.invisionfree.com/Reality_Shac ... &p=2209140

I later made this side-by-side comparison - on February 15, 2011:
THE "9/11 TRUTHERS" VICSIM LOOK-ALIKES http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.ph ... 6#p2350616


Then, the letsrollforums member "Fubar" posted this 'modified' version on their forum - on February 21, 2011:

Note the "letsrollforum.com" signature added at bottom right. I wonder why that was added ?
Wouldn't it have been nicer of Fubar to cite the source of my picture comparison? http://www.septclues.com/VICSIMS/Lukasz ... dowski.JPG

...and here is Phil Jayhan's triumphant comment - on that same letsrollforums thread:

"We are picking these guys off like flies on shit."
http://letsrollforums.com/showpost.php? ... stcount=13

Perhaps I should start putting a "cluesforum.info" signature on ALL of my research images...

[hoi.polloi]

Not a bad idea, Simon.

[whatsgoingon]

q

[hoi.polloi]

Not that it matters who pointed this out first; anyone can trace the info back if they want to.

But just to be clear, it's obvious this is Simon's image stolen/recreated for a number of reasons:

1. we saw Simon make his and post it back on the 16th of September. The EXIF data shows a number of dates before LetsRoll's.

2. the image quality of their version is lower - yet it claims to be at 100% quality, meaning they edited existing JPGs and then resaved it.

3. why they modified it to have a white blotch in the lower right corner of their new crop might be beyond anyone's guess but the original picture Simon found didn't have it. Nor did Simon's export.

However, knowledge is knowledge and it's not like they're claiming to have discovered it for themselves. Let the dude be exposed all over the net and let everyone put their own little signature on it. Who cares?!

[nonhocapito]

I'm not sure, but I think they simply implemented a script that automatically adds a watermark to any picture they show, without consideration as to the origins of this or that picture (using one of these techniques, probably). Such a script would work actively and retroactively for any picture loaded on any page of letsroll, so individual members who posted the pictures might even be unaware of it. This is probably part of Jayhan's pathetic efforts to prove his forum matters so that he manages to sell it for a million dollars (sarcasm). The situation over there is so lame that cluesforum cannot be linked to or even be mentioned, only referred to as "the other forum". Pretty unbelievable if you ask me. I wouldn't be too worried about what happens over there.