First off (not "of"), "Henrik" LIED again! Why would 'he' be "unable to post" in the "introduce yourself" thread, since that's one of the few places newly registered users are supposed to post in first now?Makkonen wrote:Hello everyone,
I got a PM allegedly from Henrik Lied relating to this post: http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.ph ... 0#p2357540 . Posted with permission.
Re: OSLO and UTØYA, 7/22 2011
Sent: August 24th, 2011, 3:47 pm
Hi, Makkonen -
I was unable to post in the "Introduce Yourself" thread, and therefore also in every other thread on this forum, but I felt like I should at least send you a PM even if I'm unable to post directly to the utøya-thread.
I got a message from a friend that a photo I had taken was shown on a popular conspiracy forum, and I thought I might be able to clear some things up for you.
First of: This whole thing happened. It's completely horrifying, and it has shaken Norway to the bone. Which is why I find it very odd and quite insensitive to speculate in the fashion that's being done in this thread.
Second point, which is what I gather you're trying to illustrate by using mine and this other fellow's image, is that the two photos are taken at two different locations. Mine isn't taken near the memorial.
Please ask me anything. I'll probably be able to clear stuff up. :-)
What does everyone think?
Answer: 'he' wanted to try to slither in the "back door" instead
Secondly, trying to shill for what we repeatedly demonstrate and expose by every faked 'official' photo, bogus story and atrocious acting over & over did not happen, is pretty desperate of this pathetic perp puppet.
I especially love the avoidance of what we really do here by calling it a "conspiracy forum" instead of media fakery/hoax investigation & exposure
If 'he' really photographed the images shown on that Flickr account, I'd like to know what the hell is wrong with all the perps' "cameras" that the gamma balance is always buggered!
Even the wikimedia ones with Exif data are darkened.
I've come to realize that "Exif data" is pretty meaningless in these cases, since if it can be removed it can also be changed — or simply circumvented by using a genuine camera shot as a template without recording any 'modifications'. (Remember all locks were only made to keep honest people out )