It is not "real" right?
[EDIT] With my sincere excuse to "brianv" I have found a source of this idiotic picture. I would like to express, that if "brianv" actually had made the pic himself, it would likely looked Real! I would also like to express a note to the newpaper ... eh ...
It is NRK Nyheter Norge Norge Television that published this! Hhhhaaaa!! Gnn!Now, with reference to this "long" version of a Norwegan Wiking on site of the car bomb site You-Tube Video
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAj6oVRPMzQ
YES ! It is a real gem!
If we compare the Norge-TV version with this "original" we see that on the TV two short parts are used from the longer version. When he walks towards the square, he momentarily pan right, where there is a lot of people, a police officer/rescue worker, and a guy in a red shirt that comes running. This was cut, so the TV version don't show a lot of people on the square.
The TV version show a short cut with the black "car", that incidentally did not had its roof blown off like in the 7-7-05 London Terrorist Exercise. (An engine and a license plate would be nice, please!) He then pan upwards towards the building, and the cut in the TV version was made immediately prior to this.
We also notice, that the TV-copy is to a minimum of 4x better quality compared to the you-tube version. This must be due to "video compression"
you may watch a music video on you-tube for comparison.Yes! Then!
What other videos do we see? The name of his channel is PirateBay, sorry, Pirateay
We find a non-conspiratorial Apollo mission video ... who would air a NON-conspiratorial moon landing video? (There is something seriously wrong here...) Yes, and the Apollo video is also a re-cut from different missions, in addition to including the land-rower-in -atmosphere-cut as well as the astronaut jumping down a hill supported by a wire-shot.
Yes!
And then there is one or two videos about TELEVISION, where it comes from, and how they worked in the old days.
So, when it comes to evaluation of this particular camera-amateur, there is missing fire trucks, there is too much people, the video was cut not to show the people, published on a channel possibly even as ridiculous as the Tina cart channel, the TV have a much higher resolution version so I guess that this was not taken by any
cell-phone (?? possibly a very new cell-phone!) I would like to put in a question about the voice of the amateur on the film: If there is something wrong with the video, it is likely that the video is separate from the Talking, that is from a studio.
A lot of people is going like on a garbage dump, when, evidently, several more bombs could be set to go off at any minute. The psychology is also important: He walks right up to the exploded car, and actually pass by this car three times before the video go out. He must have bee told that the car is SAFE! The colour of the car is black, and no identifying object of any kind is seen.
[Edit:]
Makkonen wrote:"Marxist Hunter"WHO WRITES/CREATES THIS CRAP AND WHO IS BUYING IT!?
Agree with Makkonen!

WHO WRITES/CREATES THIS CRAP AND WHO IS BUYING IT!? 











