Anthony Lawson...BUSTED!

How the controlled opposition was designed to be part of the 9/11 hoax

Anthony Lawson...BUSTED!

Postby hoi.polloi on April 20th, 2010, 10:04 am

simonshack 4 Apr 20 2010, 08:13 AM wrote:
D.Duck 4 Apr 13 2010, 10:01 AM wrote:

The only thing shills can do these days is to make shitty talk shows trying to spread confusion and distraction...





...and then disappear... :rolleyes:

http://www.youtube.com/user/911thology

Didn't last half as long as his roommate Anthony Lawson. :lol:


Was it you who told me or did I tell you about Anthony Lawson, the UK asset protection firm?

I found the corporate site a while ago, but after you thoroughly dismantled his "anti-nose-out" garbage, it disappeared. Now all I can find is an address.

I figure Anthony Lawson is just the maritime legal name for a hired asset-protection corporation disguised as an individual human web content creator.


Anthony Lawson

Contact Details
121 Chase Side
Southgate
London
N14 5HD
Tel: 020 8882 1700
Fax: 020 8882 2700

About
Anthony Lawson are Southgate based accountants offering accounting services throughout London and surrounding areas. Information on the range of services offered by Anthony Lawson can be obtained by phoning 020 8882 1700 or visiting them at 121 Chase Side



If you try going to the old site http://www.anthonylawson.co.uk it says site is "temporarily unavailable"

Should we give them a call and ask the name of our lovely voice actor on that simply brilliant video that "debunked" Simon Shack? :D
hoi.polloi
Administrator
 
Posts: 4856
Joined: November 14th, 2010, 8:24 pm

Postby hoi.polloi on April 20th, 2010, 10:15 am

A map - appearing to pinpoint the place if it really does exist in North London.

http://www.find-uk-accountant.co.uk/lon ... awson.html

http://www.bizwiki.co.uk/accounting-ser ... lawson.htm
hoi.polloi
Administrator
 
Posts: 4856
Joined: November 14th, 2010, 8:24 pm

Postby antipodean on April 20th, 2010, 11:26 am

Not that long ago he used to live in Thailand, I wonder what the attraction was.

http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewto ... 297#100297
antipodean
Member
 
Posts: 578
Joined: October 20th, 2009, 2:53 am

Postby simonshack on June 28th, 2010, 2:24 pm

According to Anthony Lawson, a "Boeing 747-sized engine" was found in Murray and Church street. Funny that we never see that huge piece of machinery sailing down to the streets from the impact hole...But wait! Perhaps it's at the tip of that white smoke trail? :lol:

Image





Anthony Lawson says:
@dnbmonster1: I've blocked you, but for your own benefit, explain to yourself what a Boeing 747-sized engine was doing coming out of a missile and landing in Murray and Church St. Shack has never addressed this embarrassing FACT, he only deals in unsubstantiated theories. A big aircraft engine, which hits a tall building on its way down from the South Tower is not a myth, or the result of CGI. Learn to look into things for yourself.

"SEPTEMBER CLUES BUSTED"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6jS2Ah2 ... re=related




They are sure giving the man a run for his money over at "September Clues Busted". Read the comments he's getting - and post some yourself if you're in the mood...
http://www.septemberclues.info
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6408
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Postby nameofthepen on July 22nd, 2010, 5:27 am

simonshack 4 Jun 28 2010, 02:24 PM wrote:According to Anthony Lawson, a "Boeing 747-sized engine" was found in Murray and Church street.



Ha ha...I went over to "SEPTEMBER CLUES BUSTED"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6jS2Ah2 ... re=related


alawson911
5 days ago
@vaughnjb: Thank you. I could hear the lions roaring in a zoo, about 4 miles from where I once lived, too. So Theresa Renaud would have definitely heard the explosion caused by the first hit



On a still night the sound of lions roaring can carry five miles or more and can serve as an acoustic signpost...
http://nationalzoo.si.edu/Publications/ ... nsroar.cfm

Good grief! :D I don't know the name of this kind of "What's that got to do with it?" logical fallacy, but...doh!
nameofthepen
Member
 
Posts: 28
Joined: July 9th, 2010, 6:02 pm

Anthony Lawson...BUSTED!

Postby allancw on July 18th, 2011, 1:56 pm

I just posted this re Lawson:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CagzVi0JzD0

allan
allancw
Member
 
Posts: 40
Joined: July 18th, 2011, 1:54 pm

Re: Debunking Lawson, new video

Postby simonshack on July 18th, 2011, 6:10 pm

*

Well done, Allan! :)

I have always wondered why the obvious, conflicting shadows issue hasn't been taken up my more people along the years...

Image

The shadow issue is also treated on http://septemberclues.info/wtc_airplanes.htm
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6408
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: Debunking Lawson, new video

Postby simonshack on July 19th, 2011, 9:32 am

*

I learned today (from the man himself) that Master SeptClues-Buster Extraordinaire - aka "Anthony Lawson"...

Image
Anthony Lawson

...has not yet watched the 2008 version of September Clues ! :lol: :rolleyes:


Anthony Lawson wrote (on July 19, 2011): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6jS2Ah22us

Your condescending manner is not encouraging, so try to go easy on it. I have been made aware that you reinstated the words you edited from Theresa Reynaud's statement. But have you ever explained why you took them out in the first place? Tampering with evidence is rather like opening Pandora's box; once such a lie is established, in people's minds, retracting it doesn't do much food. And why would I want to watch the 2008 version? What other changes have you made?



The lazy old fart ! :P
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6408
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: Anthony Lawson...BUSTED!

Postby simonshack on July 19th, 2011, 2:20 pm

*

I solemnly declare Anthony Lawson and his "September Clues Busted!" hit piece, definitively buried in the dungeons of shillery.


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6jS2Ah22us

For more info about the burial, please follow the current conversation on Youtube between fraudster Law-son and yours truly:
SEPTEMBER CLUES BUSTED! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6jS2Ah22us

Just for the record (in case he deletes my posts) here is what I finally decided to get out of my guts:

my comments to Anthony Lawson on his 'BUSTED' comment page(July, 19 2011)

Ok - enough is enough: It's about time to call out Lawson for the all-out fraudster that he is. Please stop this video at 8:12 - As you see, Lawson puts a white arrow on a black blob (supposed to be 'the plane'). Now, I have 4 versions of this FOX clip (from different sources) - all in similar or higher resolution. THERE'S SIMPLY NO BLACK BLOB to be seen in mine. Yes, I do realize this is a case of my word /against Lawson's word. All I can say is: do your OWN research, people!

And if anyone wonders why I didn't point this out a long time ago, it has just been a choice of mine not to indulge into such 'pixel fights'. Since the army of shills deployed against September Clues just love to start controversy and infighting. Moreover, of course, September Clues is certainly not only about FOX's nose-out disaster. So I've kept silent (maybe for too long) about Lawson's silly little black blob insertion. But the time has come to say: enough is enough. You're busted, Lawson.


NO PLANE IN WIDE SHOT! ANTHONY LAWSON INSERTED IT HIMSELF ! :lol:
Image
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6408
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: Anthony Lawson...BUSTED!

Postby nonhocapito on July 19th, 2011, 3:22 pm

Lawson exercise doesn't deserve the time of the day. Aside of being completely not up-to-date with the research (fake victims included):

1) So an eye witness contradicts an anchor, or another anchor contradicts for a moment the script. So what. These details were not "conveniently ignored" by Simon Shack, as much as they were meant from the beginning exactly to prevent arguments of a future Simon Shack. Lawson does not consider the simple proved fact that contradictions and slip-ups where buried into the story from the beginning. By keeping researchers scratching their heads about details and contradictions, they made sure we would not consider for a long time the simple possibility that the whole thing was fake, TV fake, because it had elements into it in support of one conspiracy theory or the other.

2) The nose-out does not perfectly match? It matches enough to be completely unreal. In any case, it is completely unreal for an aluminum plane to go through a steel tower. I repeat, a steel tower, not a glass tower. One of the historical contributions of September Clues is to allow us to get "out of the box" and start to rationally and accurately consider the possibility of fakery. Of course the 9/11 fakery has an almost infinite number of elements to it that cannot all be considered in one video. How about getting up-to-date with the research, Lawson?

3) So one douchebag anchor gives us an explanation for alleged power disruptions during the nose out incidents. How is this to be trusted, when we assume they are all onto the scam? The douchebag anchor is just trying to cover for the previous mistake is all.

4) As to the blob of pixel that might or might not be there in the zoom out (I don't have the original official footage of that, and I can't find it in the 9/11 tv web archive), it is being argued enough by Simon on the youtube page, but I don't see any difference anyway since the whole footage is fake. Even if it was there, it could have been added graphically anyway, so what's the deal? Lawson blabs about the "overlay only being viable" when the camera zooms in, but this argument could be sort of valid only at an early stage of the research, when it was assumed that the film of the towers could be real, and the planes superimposed. It is much more logic to think, in fact, that the towers and the smoke were a composite as well as the planes, and the errors were only due to the need to create the composite image live (with a 17 seconds delay, actually) in synch with real explosives or directions of wind. So the point is irrelevant anyway.
nonhocapito
Administrator
 
Posts: 2503
Joined: July 10th, 2010, 6:38 am
Location: Italy

Re: Anthony Lawson...BUSTED!

Postby Brutal Metal on July 27th, 2011, 7:36 am

NonCap Lawson isn't worthy of your excellent insights above, he's just another Cog in the broken wheel of disinformation (His 911 beliefs are on par with the Jones'z and Avery'z... OH NO that Sept Clues research is hogwash, same old broken record!)The guys DORKY voice alone is enough for a Skull Bashing :lol: He conveniently leaves out Mountains of evidence for no planes and fake victims!
Like we've discussed before the LCD (lowest common denominator) in the USA is about 75% of it's citizens, sad but true these are the ones that believe all that is told to them in the media and their government. SO getting them to rise up and grasp what Sept Clues
is trying to convey is just too much.. It SUCKS!! I hold grudges for a LONG Time so count me in for future dogfights
Brutal Metal
Member
 
Posts: 401
Joined: July 22nd, 2010, 4:58 am

Re: Anthony Lawson...BUSTED!

Postby BNSF9647 on July 31st, 2011, 12:11 am

He also believes a 767-200 and F4 Phantom have the same flight characteristics... Now everyone is a aviation expert after 911. I would love to see a 767-200 do over 400 knots at '700 above sea level, matter of fact I would sell my seat in hell to view that miracle :rolleyes:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L978nIT-AY4
BNSF9647
Member
 
Posts: 18
Joined: February 20th, 2011, 6:18 am

Re: Anthony Lawson...BUSTED!

Postby simonshack on May 23rd, 2012, 5:35 pm

*


Today I've been 'challenged' by Mr. Lawson about the Verrazano bridge issue. Lawson wrote, on his Youtube channel:

Anthony Lawson wrote:By the way are you still touting your absurd video about the moving bridge? Have you worked out why that optical illusion could have occurred, by looking up some information on the visual distortions caused by long lens photography, and a very simple-to-understand phenomenon known as motion parallax? Or do you still think some inept graphics operators made a mistake and caused the bridge to move in that sequence?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYSGv5HNPxQ


I have invited Mr. Lawson to come here and defend his theory. ( Needless to say, Lawson's theory is that the imagery aired by the TV NETWORKS on 9/11 was absolutely real, legit and authentic. ) <_<


THE VERRAZANO BRIDGE ISSUE


To the left: The Verrazano bridge as aired on 9/11 on ABC TV (and later on the History Channel)
To the right: The Verazzano bridge as depicted in a private pre-9/11 aerial video.

Image

It has been argued that this ridiculously big aspect of the Verrazano seen on LIVE TV on 9/11 could be easily explained by a well-known optical phenomena called 'lens distorsion' - or by parallax-related issues. Sure enough, when using a powerful telephoto zoom lens, objects in the backdrop will appear larger than with a 'shorter' lens (such as a standard 50mm or a 24mm wide angle lens) - no question about that. The question is - BY HOW MUCH? And is it conceivable that the 2 shots above were shot with totally different lenses? In the above comparison, the Verrazano bridge in the ABC shot appears roughly 3.3 times larger/wider than in the private pre-9/11 shot - yet the foregrounds of the 2 shots are framed in almost identical fashion.

Here is now a sequence from the 9/11 LIVE TV broadcasts, showing the bridge drifting in the backdrop. It has been argued this could be explained by the TV helicopter camera's zoom out motion/and sideways drift of the chopper which supposedly carried the TV cameraman :
Image

The problem is: at the end of this sequence, the zoom-out motion stops. Yet, the bridge continues to drift sideways at brisk rate - while the 'helicopter' appears to be almost stationary (see foreground buildings).

Furthermore, please consider these facts:
- The distance of the Verrazano bridge from the WTC is/was almost 12km.
- The height of its pillars is 211m - roughly half the height of the WTC towers - 417m.

Now, imagine for a minute that the bridge pillars were as tall as the towers themselves. Here is what it would look like:

Image

The challenge is open for anyone wishing to take it:


Choose two equally tall buildings (A -in foreground ; and B - in backdrop) placed 12kilometers apart. Use whichever existing lens you wish - and choose to stand at whichever distance you wish (from A) with your camera. See if you can get B to look as tall as we see it in the image above.

Good luck! :)
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6408
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: Anthony Lawson...BUSTED!

Postby whatsgoingon on May 23rd, 2012, 7:06 pm

a
Last edited by whatsgoingon on May 24th, 2013, 10:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
whatsgoingon
DELETED THEIR OWN POSTS :(
 
Posts: 578
Joined: October 13th, 2011, 8:56 pm

Re: Anthony Lawson...BUSTED!

Postby simonshack on May 23rd, 2012, 7:27 pm

Dear whatsgoingon,

Here are the last 7 seconds of "FLIGHT 175" - according to 2 different, officially released videos:

The one at left is the so-called "ALQAEDA shot" - which the FBI told us was found on an AL QAEDA website...
The one at right is the so-called "DIVEBOMBER shot" - as aired on CBS.

Image

I don't think there can be any debate here as to the fakeness of AT LEAST ONE of the 2 videos above. But let' see what Mr Lawson has to say.
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6408
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Next

Return to Truthers and shills

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest