This is only a brief, introductory thread. For our full LONDON 7/7 investigations, please go here :
http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f= ... 1#p2274851
JOHN HOWARD SAID: "52 DIED IN LONDON YESTERDAY"
Goofy Australian Prime Minister exposes the 7/7 terror psyop from the word go!
In August 2010, our forum member Timothy Murphy received this letter from former Australian Prime Minister JOHN HOWARD (in response to Timothy's letter to Mr Howard's concerning his 'supernatural foreknowledge' of the "52" victims casualty figure - see details below) :
John "Goofy" Howard
What's this all about, you may ask? Well, John Howard had beaten the BBC to the "52" figure by about 3 days. In fact, the BBC announced the final / confirmed death-toll of "52" only on July 11, 2005.
John Howard's statement of the 52 figure was published on the 7/7 'hour-by-hour timelines' of "Der Spiegel" and "La Repubblica". Both timelines of these two major European newspapers reported - respectively at 5:33a.m. and at 8:09a.m. of July8 - John Howard's announcement that "52 persons" ("including 7 Australians") had perished.
The fact is that there was no plausible / possible way that John Howard could have known the final death toll at that moment in time. That is, unless John Howard has psychic powers - or was fully aware that 7/7 was a pre-programmed psyop - involving 52 fictitious victims. Let's have a look at the incontrovertible evidence at hand, the core question being : why did John Howard announce (in the early morning hours of July 8, 2005) that 52 people had died - at a time when the UK police had just released a figure of only 37 victims?
Here's the letter that Timothy Murphy sent to Der Spiegel, La Repubblica - and to Prime Minister JOHN HOWARD :
Re:
The Australian Prime Minister's July 8 statement on the 7/7 bombings
Sirs,
This letter describes an incongruity in two newspapers' official 7/7 timelines. Therein, Australian Prime Minister John Howard appears to be credited with supernatural foreknowledge: On the official timelines for July 8 2005, DER SPIEGEL and LA REPUBBLICA cite statements by the Australian government and the Australian Prime Minister about the London Bombings.
In these statements, a death toll of 52 is reported:
DER SPIEGEL - July 8, 2005 http://www.spiegel.de/international/liv ... 64153.html
+++ Number of Deaths climbs to 52 +++
(5:33 a.m. CET) According to statements made by the Australian government, the number of dead has risen to 52. Further deaths are feared, said Australia's Prime Minister, John Howard. In Great Britain, 37 deaths have so far been confirmed.
LA REPUBBLICA - July 8, 2005 http://www.repubblica.it/2005/g/dirette ... ref=search
08:09 - 8 luglio 2005 Premier australiano: "I morti sono 52"
"Secondo il primo ministro australiano John Howard, il bilancio delle vittime è di 52 persone, di cui 7 cittadini australiani. La cifra fornita da Howard contrasta con quella ufficiale della polizia londinese (37) ma il premier non ha spiegato ai giornalisti da dove provengano le sue informazioni."
Translation:
8:09 a.m. July 8, 2005
"According to Prime Minister John Howard, the death-toll is of 52 persons, including 7 Australian citizens. The figure reported by Howard conflicts with the official figure of the London Police (37) but the prime minister has not specified to the press the source of his informations."
back up of la Repubblica article
However, on the evening of July 7, the BBC had reported a death toll of only 37 victims:In fact, the first BBC report to mention the final. alleged death toll of 52BBC:
The known death toll at the end of the first day is 37 with more than 700 injured.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4694069.stm
New York Times - July 8, 2005:
"Subway and Bus Blasts in London Kill at Least 37"
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/08/inter ... d=all&_r=0
was not released until four days after the "terror attack", on July 11:The timelines constructed by Der Spiegel and La Repubblica imply that John Howard - the Australian Prime Minister - had more information than the UK police, the BBC and Scotland Yard. Therefore his statements do not make sense in the context of those timelines.BBC NEWS - Monday, 11 July, 2005, 18:18 GMT 19:18 UK
The first victim of the London bombings is named as the confirmed number of dead reaches 52.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4671993.stm
Why did John Howard, on the morning of July 8, have more information than the UK police? And why does he prophetically choose the figure that is now emblematic of the tragedy of 7/7 ? "52" - the figure that is enshrined in the 7/7 memorial and in most reflections upon that day?
We demand a joint clarification from Der Spiegel, La Repubblica and the Australian government, of John Howard’s prophetic statement, and its incongruous place within the official London Bombings timelines of these two respected European newspapers.
As you can see in John Howard's letter pictured above, his best 'response' to this epic cock-up is:
"I'm sorry that I cannot precisely source that advice"
*****************************************************************************************************************************************************
Moreover, why did JOHN HOWARD state (at 5:33 on July 8, 2005) that 7 Australians were among the "52 victims"?
As it turned out, only ONE Australian 7/7 victim was eventually reported - and he allegedly died in hospital, a FULL WEEK later!
SAM LY ("Some lie?")
"The only Australian killed in the bombings, was in the UK on a working holiday with his long-term girlfriend, Mandy Ha."
"The 28-year-old computer worker was recovered from the wreckage of the bus with serious injuries. His father and nephew flew to London to be at his hospital bedside, but he died a week later on 14 July 2005."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12207397
Now, try guessing the first name of Sam Ly's mourning father - quick !
'Some lie high lies'. Indeed."In a statement given to the police in 2005, his father, Hi Ly, said Sam was thoughtful and considerate and had encouraged him to remarry..."
In any case, the fact remains that JOHN HOWARD uttered the final death-toll of "52" in the early morning hours of July 8, 2005. The odds of this being "pure coincidence" are astronomical - and tantamount to winning the National Lottery.