well this is another topic that I'm really interested in.
Media told us at 9/11 that the weather was clear and indeed on no available footage you will see any cloud. I know there is indeed no proof that it was a sunny day but it shouldn't be a big deal to find that out.
So this brings me to my question:
What if there was rain? Or even worse: strong winds and storms.
Going through the idea that on 9/11 there could have been storms, what would have the media told us?
Flying an airplane at almost sealevel is one thing, flying there with strong winds is another. So the fact that it could have been raining that day would have made the media story even more pathetic than it already is.
I just recently heard of the hurricane Erin that was active since the beginning of September 2001 and there was indeed the possibility that parts of it could have come in contact with New York.
So, what I'm thinking of atm is following:
- The story would have been just pathetic if there was rain and storms in New York on 9/11. Did the perps have a plan B or what would have they done in this scenario?
- Faking the live footage would have been more difficult (I'm not a pro in this but it's my guess). All the clouds in the background and so on.
- Now imagine there were serious storms that day: Noone would believe the story of unskilled alCIAda-ALLAH-ALLAH-bin-laden terrorists flying a huge plan under these circumstances. Did they have a plan B again?
- Was there even the possibility to render 3d graphics showing such huge clouds?
Now considering that the whole media hoax was calculated for the specific date, 9/11, it was pretty risky for them to have weather issues, don't you think?
I found the following during my little research:
“Due to a Tornado in the area we cannot connect your call”
said by a guy that tried to call someone in New York that day, here's the source
Could this even have something to do with the "electronic jamming" that we are discussing in another thread?
What are your opinions about the weather issue?