Naudet Original Broadcast

by **simonshack** on October 29th, 2010, 4:14 pm

Either way , I don't see the point in discussing a ridiculously low-quality version of the Naudet's 1st hit. By the same logic, should we start discussing why this other version has 2 bangs in it? Hope not.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCGNZzdwEiM

The top-resolution DVD version has been proven fake in every imaginable way. What more can be 'discovered' about the Naudet 1st sh#t ?

IMHO - We have better things to do, gentlemen.

by **hoi.polloi** on October 29th, 2010, 4:24 pm

Yes!

If your attention is turned toward such things, do it.

Research! Research! Research!

My attitude is, "Let's find out what we can discover," not "I have made up my mind about this so it's not worth anyone discussing at all."

No plane theory is the most compelling discovery that led to all of our research. I am impressed that you are saying digging through rubble pics might be "more important". Who is to say?

by **simonshack** on October 29th, 2010, 5:18 pm

hoi.polloi 4 Oct 29 2010, 03:24 PM wrote: Yes!

If your attention is turned toward such things, do it.

Research! Research! Research!

My attitude is, "Let's find out what we can discover," not "I have made up my mind about this so it's not worth anyone discussing at all."

No plane theory is the most compelling discovery that led to all of our research. I am impressed that you are saying digging through rubble pics might be "more important". Who is to say?

I was only referring to the value of spending time debating the lowest-resolution version available of the Naudet clip - nothing more.
I certainly do not discourage the 'act' of researching! :lol:

by **Veritasirl** on October 29th, 2010, 5:53 pm

There seems to me at least to be a bit of personal sniping going on at times between long time members here. This is detrimental to the research. Surely the path of research is not set rigidly set in stone. So what if someone occasionally ventures down a side path to discuss something that is deemed of lesser importance by others. Who is to say that something of importance may not emerge from that discussion? Is it not the sum of the total research that counts not just the importance of individual areas of research? Surely there can be disagreement without personalising it. To have internecine infighting here is just what the enemies of this forum would enjoy and while they circle like vultures waiting for its demise.
Just my observation as a newcomer here.

by **hoi.polloi** on October 29th, 2010, 6:44 pm

Don't worry about the perps. They get off on all sorts of things that are none of our business. :P

Thanks for the support of researching where research goes though. :)

by **Veritasirl** on October 29th, 2010, 7:13 pm

Hoi, An uncanny likeness between Gouliani and his alleged bodyguard! What could be the purpose of this?

by **hoi.polloi** on October 30th, 2010, 5:52 pm

Alright, I'm ready to get debunked! Have at me! :D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0A4BdlPmAA

by **hoi.polloi** on October 31st, 2010, 5:27 pm

nonhocapito, do you think you can transform that Gamma Press first hit into an AVI or MOV or something please?

I want to see if it's closer to the frames of the CBS version or DVD version or something else. It looks like it doesn't even have a PAL framerate of 25...

by **reel.deal** on November 1st, 2010, 12:21 am

by **simonshack** on November 1st, 2010, 7:49 pm

Indeed excellent, Hoi! Sorry - can't debunk it. ;)

by **reel.deal** on November 3rd, 2010, 5:40 pm

by **hoi.polloi** on November 3rd, 2010, 5:59 pm

Aha! There just happened to be a camera there taking the exact same picture that the Naudets captured. Fascinating.

YEAAAH RIIIIIGGHT! :lol:

by **reel.deal** on November 3rd, 2010, 7:29 pm

by **fakers911** on November 3rd, 2010, 9:03 pm

@Reel.Deal: Can you provide the source of that 3rd image please?

by **reel.deal** on November 3rd, 2010, 9:29 pm

Naudet Original Broadcast

Who is online