9/11 Institutions

The most common objection people have to our research: "Too many people would have been involved to pull off such a massive hoax." Well, with trillions of taxpayers' dollars at hand, this operation could certainly afford contracting many individuals (under a gag order and on a need-to-know basis). Meet the real - and unreal - persons, companies & entities assigned to carry out this gigantic, media & military-assisted psyop.

Postby simonshack on August 1st, 2010, 4:38 pm

*


THE WTC'S DECLINE AND EXODUS



Talking about "9/11 institutions", what of the WTC complex itself? What was it exactly? Most people in the world are still under the impression that those towering behemoths really were the pride of US bustling capitalism, with shiny modern offices and luscious furniture - and lots of happy tenants, all the way up to 2001. This is entirely false. Of course, the news media kept hammering into our minds that there were "50.000 people" in those buildings... Hence, in order for the public to start accepting that the WTC towers were actually empty (and hopefully everyone knows no one can die in an empty building), it is absolutely essential to destroy this basic myth.

Here are some extracts of "Divided we stand" by Eric Darton (1999) which should be quite illuminating for people who don't know - or cannot come to terms with the notion - that the towers were a redundant, decrepit and largely vacated ghost structure - perhaps long before 2001.

Image***Image

(from p.190)
DETAILS: THE PHYSICAL PLANT

Pacing out the periphery of the trade towers in the late 1990s, one nav-
igated a cracked badlands of sidewalk crudely patched with mismatch-
ing cement. The weathered, gray (originally white) Italian marble
paving on the plaza was a spiderweb of cracks, a condition that under-
mined the addition of benches and flowerbeds and the tinkling medley
of new-age harmonics emanating from a score of tiny speakers mounted
beneath Yamasaki's arcades. Construction equipment and barricades
around the site appeared to have been deployed and then abandoned
by a retreating army.

And up in the towers, where asbestos removal was still under way,
a host of details pointed toward a rift opening up within the trade cen-
ter itself. In 1985, when New York State moved most of its offices out,
Dean Witter consolidated its operations in twenty-four floors of Tower
2 under a twenty-year lease. Visiting the brokerage and investment
firm's offices and cafeterias, one invariably found them spotlessly
maintained. But on adjacent floors, particularly those with multiple
tenants, the paint was dingy, the carpets were stained, fixtures re-
mained broken, and burned-out fluorescent lights went unreplaced, as
did discolored ceiling tiles. And the listing of a company on the direc-
tory did not reliably indicate that a company was still there.


And who indeed was there, inhabiting the self-proclaimed heart of
world trade? In 1966, as the PA was bulldozing Radio Row, the City
Planning Commission reported that "the prime objective of the WTC is
to simplify and expand international trade by centralizing and consoli-
dating within the Center essential world trade services and activi-
ties.... The Center will contain only government agencies and private
firms which play a part in international marketing and in the adminis-
trative processing of world trade. "
Yet according to its own
1993 occupancy survey, the Port Authority found that trade service and
import-export tenants accounted for only 5 percent of its leases.

The Port Authority closed out the 1990s with a stream of press re-
leases announcing the rental of unimaginably huge quantities of trade
center office space
to "cutting-edge" firms like Sun Microsystems. Yet
around the complex a million square feet stood empty, and the build-
ings originally intended as great catalyzing chambers of world trade
were, by degrees, transforming into a kind of disjunctive real estate
layer-cake. One story above the carpeted, wood-paneled offices of a
Japanese securities firm, a group of artists filled bare walls with boldly
colored images and hung sculptures from the exposed ceiling girders of
a vast echoing cavern. As part of a Lower Manhattan Cultural Council
program that turned some of the vacant space in the towers over to
artists rent-free, 40,000 square feet of concrete floor lay paint-
spattered and strewn with the raw materials of a creative urge that has
never been easily reconciled with the imperatives of a bottom line.


On page 204, Eric Darton mentions what is defined as 'the modest economy boost'
of the WTC1993 bombings (I kid you not!) which allowed to relocate
350 bombed-out trade center tenants into vacant office space nearby...


from p. 204

In January 1996, Governor Pataki announced that he was moving
the trade center's last state tenant, the governor's office itself, to cheaper,
more convenient space in midtown.

ACCENTUATE THE POSITIVE

The February 1993 blast in the basement of the World Trade Center
killed 6 people, injured 1,000 others, displaced 50,000 workers, and
threw 900 Vista Hotel and Windows on the World employees out of
work, but it also provided a modest boost for the regional economy.
This, at any rate, was the conclusion the Port Authority came to in an
April 1993 report released six weeks after the bombing.

(...)

For the agency, this silver lining was due in part to the ease with
which the 350 bombed-out trade center tenants could be moved into
abundant vacant office space nearby.
Breathing an almost palpable
sigh of relief, then-PA chair Richard Leone noted that relocating ten-
ants would have been far more protracted and expensive had the ex-
plosion occurred in the boom year of 1985.



In other words, may I tentatively presume that the 1993 bombings helped scare the sh#t out of the last remaining WTC tenants and make them get the hell outta there? You should also know that the official line (post-2001) was that "in September 2001 the WTC towers were at 95% capacity and had 400 tenants". Could that possibly have been a ...ehrm...a lie? Well, "95%" cannot be the truth anyway - since even Wikipedia lists a large number of completely empty floors.

In any case, the material in Darton's book written in 1999 informs us of two extremely interesting factts:

- After the 1993 bombings, 50,000 workers were displaced and 350 tenants were relocated outside the WTC.

- At the end of the nineties, " a stream of press releases announced the rental of unimaginably huge quantities of trade center office space."


So, this begs the question: Could they possibly have "VIRTUALLY re-populated" the WTC towers - with a string of phony press releases?
http://www.septemberclues.info
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6408
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Postby hoi.polloi on August 2nd, 2010, 5:13 pm

Interesting speculating, Simon. I think you are on to something and they know that it would eventually come to this.

If we could reduce by deduction the number of real companies from the list of tenants supposedly involved at the time, and we were able to figure out who was able to create the other ones (companies that turn out to be fake, or have fake extensions/sub-companies/presences in the WTC) perhaps we could discover who was in charge of the vicsim creation program and the plan to remove the towers.

We know Peter Munk and Larry Silverstein had something to do with it, but maybe there is more information here through investigating the period from 1993 to 2001.
hoi.polloi
Administrator
 
Posts: 4856
Joined: November 14th, 2010, 8:24 pm

Postby antipodean on August 9th, 2010, 7:18 am

That 1999 published book 'Divided We Stand', by Eric Darton was a good find.
http://www.padrak.com/dividedwestand/

Here's a piece from page 149 for any lurking 'plane huggers'


To create completely columnless floors, Yamasaki and Roth de-
signed the exterior walls to bear the building's weight load. Thus we
find eighteen inches of structural steel alternating with every twenty
two inches of glass. With panes set back twelve inches to provide a
modicum of shade, a succession of vertical bars fractures our attempt
to construct an unbroken vista. The eye simply cannot make sense of
this repetitive alternation between fields of focus: opaque and trans-
parent, foreground and background, surface and depth. The promise of
limitless observation from a supreme height is canceled in the foreclo-
sure of visual coherence.



All the heart string pulling stories, about the 'Falling Man', 'Edna Cintron'etc were probably primarily invented, to fool us all into thinking that the Towers were indeed tenanted.

If all the 'Windows on the World' employees were out of a job, so much for it hosting the Risk Waters conference, & Silverstein being in the habit of all ways having his breakfast there.

This link below may have already been posted before, but it gives a good oversight to the bogus companies who were alleged WTC 1&2 tenants.
As well as documenting supposed vacant office space.
http://tbtf.com/unblinking/arc/2001-09c.htm#1world
antipodean
Member
 
Posts: 578
Joined: October 20th, 2009, 2:53 am

Postby simonshack on August 10th, 2010, 4:07 pm

*

ABOUT THE "WTC TENANTS"

Antipodean,

That "Unblinking" page stinks to high heaven.
http://tbtf.com/unblinking/arc/2001-09a.htm

The whole idea that "NO-ONE-REALLY-KNOWS" exactly how many tenants or businesses operated within the WTC is preposterous - as if the WTC was some sort of Moroccan souk /market place... :rolleyes: The "Unblinking" people boast of being experts at searching the internet for info that mere mortals usually won't find...

Apparently, the smartass "Unblinking" folks got their tenant list from "the CoStar Group - The world leader for commercial real estate intelligence"
http://www.costar.com/about/article.aspx?id=4817

You've gotta love this disclaimer they have regarding their WTC tenant list:


Although CoStar makes efforts to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its information, CoStar makes no representation or warranty regarding the quality, accuracy, timeliness or completeness of such information. CoStar cannot guarantee that its tenant specific data is 100 percent accurate or complete, and errors and omissions do occur. Accordingly, CoStar is not responsible if its information is not accurate, complete or current, and CoStar has no responsibility for any consequence relating directly or indirectly to any action or inaction that you (or a third party) take based upon the tenant specific data presented here.




Also very much worth reading is the "Unblinking" site's discussion of how they 'solved the mystery' of finding (through BELL yellow-page searches..) about 20 companies seemingly renting space in the WTC in the same suite n?7967:

"MYSTERY SOLVED" (scroll down page a little)
http://tbtf.com/unblinking/arc/2001-09b.htm#1world

See, no mystery there, folks: they were all simply renting "VIRTUAL OFFICE SPACE" from the Alliance Business Centers Network ! Here's what they do:
http://virtualofficesdenver.com/index.cfm
One may well wonder...how many of the other "WTC tenants" were - likewise - 'virtually renting' office space in the WTC towers?

*******************************************************************

TENANT LIST OF WTC1 on WickedPedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_te ... ade_Center

TENANT LIST OF WTC2 on WickedPedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_te ... ade_Center


PS: Warmest thanks also to Postal44 for input on this matter.
http://www.septemberclues.info
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6408
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Postby Postal44 on August 10th, 2010, 6:17 pm

I'd like to start off by thanking Simon and all the other Admins for my Contributor status. It was quite unexpected. I usually "think" I have figured out something, only to find out that you guys have known for quite a while, but it seems I may have actually put 2 and 2 together this time.

I went to http://tbtf.com/unblinking/arc/2001-09c.htm#1world that antipodean posted and took a look around. I started off making a list of the available space on the various floors to see just how much was vacant, but even without adding anything, I could see that it would "appear" that much of the office space was occupied.

I then checked the link on the second box down, the Twin Towers Tenant List, which takes you to http://tbtf.com/unblinking/arc/2001-09a.htm As I browsed the list, something caught my eye and I made an almost immediate connection. There were several networks that may have had offices on the 110th floor of WTC1 on the morning of 9/11, yet I can't remember ever hearing any network ever say that they lost anyone on 9/11, which they must have, since I do remember hearing that no one escaped the building from above the impact zone. Here's the list of networks that may have had a presence in WTC1 on 9/11, taken from the Unblinking page:

Tenant Floor Year
Channel (WPIX) 110 2001
Channel 2 CBS (WCBS) 110 2001
Channel 31 (WBIS) 110 2001
Channel 4 NBC 104 2001
Channel 47 (WNJU) Telemundo Noticiero 110 2001
Channel 5 Fox (WNYW) 110 2001
CNN (Turner Broadcasting / Cable Network News) 110

The way I see it, news of some sort is being broadcast around the clock. We don't know what kind of offices these were, but my guess is that since they were directly under the large broadcasting tower on WTC1 (except for NBC), they may have had something to do with getting the signal out. Either way, since the news is always going out, someone must have been in the those offices, perhaps 'round the clock.

While we've been told that most people where "just arriving" or perhaps "on there way" to work at the WTC, I think that those news offices probably had lots of people in them because of the way news works. It's always happening somewhere and whether it's radio or tv, it's always being reported. And if no one above the impact area made it out alive, there could have been hundreds of people in the those offices at the time of the "first impact", yet never any mention by any one of those networks about the people they lost that day? No memorials? Nothing?

Yesterday, it got a little more interesting. I went back to the site above and clicked on the link 240 Phone Listings, which takes you here http://tbtf.com/unblinking/arc/2001-09b.htm Here we find out, again, if the info is accurate, that there was atleast one company who's sole purpose was to make it look like other companies occupied space in the WTC's. They set you up with addresses, phone numbers and the like, and now you are in the WTC, even though you aren't even renting office space.

So now you have to wonder, what companies were actually in the WTC and which ones were just pretending to be in the WTC? Could office space have been rented for companies by a third party, but was actually vacant, but wouldn't show up on a list of vacancies making it appear that the building were mostly "full"?

So, did the networks actually have offices on the 110th floor with people working in them? If they did, then who were they and why no mention of them on any memorials. Or were they fake offices with no one in them? Either way, there should be atleast one name on atleast one memorial of "someone" who "worked" at one of those networks who didn't make it out that day, real or vicsim. Or perahps like the BATF in Oklahoma City, were they told not to come to work that day?
Postal44
Member
 
Posts: 43
Joined: February 11th, 2010, 8:42 am

Postby Postal44 on August 10th, 2010, 9:21 pm

I used Simon's link, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_te ... ade_Center, for the tenant list of WTC1 to see what "companies" had "offices" in the impact zone or above it. As you can see, 2 companies, Marsh USA and Cantor Fitzgerald "occupied" most of the floors I'm concetrating on. This is interesting since you'd only have to have these 2 companies in your pocket to "account" for almost all of the "causualties" in that area. I wonder what the chances are that the impact zone alone would only immediately effect ONE company.

Using that list, I went to the wiki page for the WTC, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Center, and found that "The damage caused to the north tower by Flight 11 destroyed any means of escape from above the impact zone, trapping 1,344 people.[113]", which was gotten from, "# ^ Dwyer, Jim; Lipton, Eric et al. (May 26, 2002). "102 Minutes: Last Words at the Trade Center; Fighting to Live as the Towers Die". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 10, 2008. http://www.webcitation.org/5bTftBx4s. Retrieved May 23, 2008. ".

So now I know how many "people" I'm looking for. I then went to Marsh's online memorial, http://memorial.mmc.com/, and added up all the names, which comes out to 332 vicsims, which is a little short of the figure on the wiki page noted above, which says they only lost 295 employees plus 60 contractors, which equals 355 total.

I then headed over to the Cantor-Fitzgerald memorial, http://www.cantorfamilies.com/cantor/jsp/index.jsp, added up all the names on there for a total of 347.

Next I did a search for victims who may have been in the Windows on the World restaurant complex, found another wiki page, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_on_the_World, and got a total of 165 "people" who died.

I subtracted these figures from the 1344 total from the first wiki page, and got a number of 500. So who are these 500 vicsims?

I just found this here, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WNBC, "During the September 11, 2001, attacks, the transmitter facilities of WNBC, as well as eight other local television stations and several radio stations, were destroyed when two hijacked airplanes crashed into and destroyed the World Trade Center in New York City. WNBC broadcast engineer Bill Steckman died in the tragedy, along with six other engineers from other television stations. After resuming over-the-air transmissions, the station broadcast from the Armstrong Tower in Alpine, New Jersey. Since 2005, WNBC is broadcasting its signal from the Empire State Building in New York City.".

I also found this wiki page, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WPIX, which says, "On September 11, 2001, the transmitter facilities of WPIX as well as eight other New York City television stations and several radio stations were destroyed when two hijacked airplanes crashed into and destroyed the World Trade Center towers. The station's lead engineer, Steve Jacobson, was among those who were lost in the tragedy. WPIX's satellite feed froze on the last video frame received from the WTC mast, an image of the Twin Towers burning; the image remained on the screen for much of the day until WPIX was able to set up alternate transmission facilities (the microwave relay for WPIX's satellite feed was also up there). Since then, WPIX has transmitted its signal from the Empire State Building.".

It would appear that the rest of the "tenants" of the 110th floor of WTC1, in a word, weren't. There is either no mention of them having anything to with WTC, or they merely had a transmitter on the roof.

So now we have 2 names of people having something to do with broadcasting having died on 9/11, and a mention of 6 others. I guess they didn't have names or something. Even if we take the 2 names + 6 other engineers, which equals 8, we are left with a gaping hole of 492 missing names. Ofcourse, I don't know how anyone would know the exact number of people in or above the impact zone anyway, and this is assuming that anyone was in there to begin with. As we've seen with the vicsim list, we haven't been able to verify anyone.
Postal44
Member
 
Posts: 43
Joined: February 11th, 2010, 8:42 am

Postby antipodean on August 13th, 2010, 6:48 am

Thanks to Postal44, I'd like to nominate NABET/CWA LOCAL11. National Association of Broadcasting Employees and Technicians,
as 9/11's most pernicious institution.

Among major employers of NABET/CWA members are the NBC and ABC networks, and independent companies in broadcast, cable, video and audio production


http://www.nabetlocal11.org/About%20Us.html

Unbelievable ! not only do the Architects of 9/11 hijack all the major news networks, they snare the Union of their very own employees. The likely first port of call for any whistle blowers.

On page 3 of NABET's October 2001 News letter, (reach for the sick bucket) the Union's President boasts about his 2 sons serving in the military. Then calls for his Union's members to back Bush's invasion plans.
http://www.wrkl.org/vol3issue7.pdf

According to page 13 of the above News Letter, this is the list of their unfortunate members who perished on 9/11.

Donna Bowen 42, Pentagon

Patricia Cushing 69, UA93

Donald DiFranco 42, WTC1

Mary Jones 72, WTC1

Alfred Marchand 45, American Flight 175 ;)

Jane Orth 49, AA11

Thomas Pecorelli 31, AA11

William Steckman 56, WTC1

Lisa Treretola 36, WTC1.

Yet a stoney silence can be heard from NABET over compensation demands for any of it's members, who died whilst on the job during 9/11.

It wouldn't be to presumptious to think that some WTC1&2 workers on 9/11, would have been members of New York's largest Union.
http://www.dc37.net/index.html

They laudably are keen to represent any of their sick first responder members.
http://www.dc37.net/about/OSHA/9_11workerscomp.html

But they don't appear to be having to represent any members going about their normal working day, who perished on 9/11,
http://www.dc37.net/search/search.aspx

Search this web site



Help
Search On : Phrase All Words Any Words
Results 0-4 of about 4

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PEP, October-November 2009: DC 37 wreath honors victims of 9/11 disaster
DC 37 laid a wreath at union headquarters to commemorate the victims of the 9/11 tragedy
http://www.dc37.net/news/PEP/10_2009/9_11victims.html


News Release, June 24, 2009: Statement from DC 37 Executive Director Lillian Roberts re introduction of James Zagroda 9/11 Health and Compensation Act
The James Zagroda 9/11 Health and Compensation Act will assist victims and rescue workers at Ground Zero
http://www.dc37.net/news/newsreleases/2009/nr6_24.html


PEP, May 2009: DC 37 presses for 9/11 bill in Congressional hearing
New York State Congress members are trying to pass legislation on behalf of victims of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
http://www.dc37.net/news/PEP/5_2009/9_11bill.html


News Release, March 9, 2006: DC 37 applauds release of first 75 million in federal money for treatment of 9/11 injured workers
DC lobbied hard to have vital funding restored for treating victims of September 11 attacks
http://www.dc37.net/news/newsreleases/2006/nr3_9.html
antipodean
Member
 
Posts: 578
Joined: October 20th, 2009, 2:53 am

Postby antipodean on August 14th, 2010, 5:36 am

Being a bit new to Skype, can someone explain to me why all those Broadcasting companies that may have had a presence in WTC1, that are mentioned in Postal44's above post, have Uruguayan listed Skype numbers.

Tenant Floor Year
Channel (WPIX) 110 2001
Channel 2 CBS (WCBS) 110 2001
Channel 31 (WBIS) 110 2001
Channel 4 NBC 104 2001
Channel 47 (WNJU) Telemundo Noticiero 110 2001
Channel 5 Fox (WNYW) 110 2001
CNN (Turner Broadcasting / Cable Network News) 110
antipodean
Member
 
Posts: 578
Joined: October 20th, 2009, 2:53 am

Postby simonshack on August 14th, 2010, 6:37 pm

Uruguyan ? :huh:
No idea. Any skype sleuth on board?
http://www.septemberclues.info
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6408
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Postby hoi.polloi on August 14th, 2010, 7:23 pm

Could you be more specific? Uruguayan country code is 598.

Area code 212 is Manhattan. What does Skype get confused by, antipodean?
hoi.polloi
Administrator
 
Posts: 4856
Joined: November 14th, 2010, 8:24 pm

Postby antipodean on August 14th, 2010, 10:43 pm

hoi.polloi @ Aug 14 2010, 07:23 PM wrote: Could you be more specific? Uruguayan country code is 598.

Area code 212 is Manhattan. What does Skype get confused by, antipodean?


Yeah I see that Manhattan is 212, but why would these listed numbers need to be called in Uruguay.
I've noticed a lot of other Skype numbers have this. It could be nothing but I'm just curious.
antipodean
Member
 
Posts: 578
Joined: October 20th, 2009, 2:53 am

Postby simonshack on August 15th, 2010, 7:36 pm

*

The Honorable Tony Blair guest at the "Always Remember Gala"

(Mary Fetchet's Voice of September looking ever more like the central 9/11 hoax cove - the hub of the hoaxers ):

http://www.voicesofseptember11.org/dev/ ... /index.php

Image


"In May 2008 he launched the Tony Blair Faith Foundation which promotes
respect and understanding between the major religions and makes the case
for faith as force for good in the modern world."



Can you hear the doves squealing ?


And don't miss out on Mary Fetchet's TV interview HERE :
(scroll down to bottom video "MAKING A DIFFERENCE")
http://voicesofseptember11.org/dev/vide ... nefitVideo
http://www.septemberclues.info
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6408
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Postby D.Duck on August 15th, 2010, 9:17 pm

Simon,

Mary Fetchet is one of my favorites or lets say 3 of my favorites cos there are 3 different persons playing the part of Mary.

AND HERE COMES MAAAAAAAARY:

Mary Nr.1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XngogqNY-ts

Mary Nr.2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7Y49xIK ... re=related

Mary Nr.3 http://voicesofseptember11.org/dev/videos.php



Mary 1.

Image


Mary 2.

Image


Mary 3.

Image

http://www.life.com/image/51805843


D.Duck
D.Duck
Member
 
Posts: 295
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:08 pm

Postby antipodean on August 16th, 2010, 9:08 am

I believe these 2 women could be the same actress.
Dawn Robinson of Fat woman escapes down stairwell fame.
Image
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HnzxYEXwfiA

And Nellie Braginskaya who made a special guest appearance at the recent, "No Mosque at Ground Zero" protests.
http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=2J ... &vq=medium
Image
She being the mother of vicsim Alex Braginsky, in such a hurry to get some mileage out of this, they couldn't get her sim surname correct.

Edit. Does this Nellie Braginskaya look old enough to have a son who would now be 47. Maybe she use's the same fountain of youth as Donna Marsh O'Connor.

Alex Braginsky attended the Risk Waters Conference at Windows, apparantly representing Reuters, check out his tributes on legacy, he gets a glowing reference from his old boss at UBS (scroll down), specialists in pedalling "I know someone who died in the Towers" stories.
http://www.legacy.com/guestbook/guestbo ... 910&page=6
antipodean
Member
 
Posts: 578
Joined: October 20th, 2009, 2:53 am

Postby nonhocapito on September 16th, 2010, 8:14 pm

September 11th Widows and Victims Families 2008
http://cryptome.org/0002/911families-2008.zip

National 911 Memorial Museum Tax Report 2006
http://cryptome.org/0002/911memorial-2006.zip

National 911 Memorial Museum Tax Report 2007
http://cryptome.org/0002/911memorial-2007.zip

National 911 Memorial Museum Tax Report 2008
http://cryptome.org/0002/911memorial-2008.zip

how much did the museum spend in 2008?
5 million dollars.
Net assets? 422 millions...

The families' association assets?
4 and a half millions... You may think it is a lot, but in fact it seems very little to me.
Proof that the money just passes through the association, going somewhere else... 'cause the scam is still solid :D
nonhocapito
Administrator
 
Posts: 2503
Joined: July 10th, 2010, 6:38 am
Location: Italy

PreviousNext

Return to THE 9/11 HOAX infrastructure - and its operatives: too many people involved?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests