hoi.polloi @ Jul 1 2010, 09:46 PM wrote: Another interesting take!
Still, it does look an awful lot like the official JFK fellow. My guess is that his death was faked and he himself was a part of the act. Video and closed off streets are safe enough




ozzybinoswald @ Jun 25 2010, 01:46 AM wrote: This is what JFK said in his Secret Society speech:
"For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covet means for expanding it's sphere of influence..." etc.
If these were his own heartfelt sentiments it's unlikely he'd mistakenly say "covet" rather than "covert" when the entire intention and the context of the message is about an international subversive element. He's reading a script somebody handed him without even being conscious of the content.
And he's talking about Commies.
hoi.polloi @ Dec 13 2009, 09:33 PM wrote:clemmie71 4 Dec 12 2009, 06:53 PM wrote: Someone will have fun chasing the truth down on this case. It’s obvious that Oswald was not JFK’s killer and the guilty party couldn’t afford to give him time to tell his story.
I spent a few minutes looking at Jack Ruby references online. Didn’t have time to download the Warren Commission report, but if someone has it, maybe they could look for JR’s SSN.
Jack Ruby was reported variously to have been born on 25 March 1911, or 25 April 1910, or 25 April 1911. Reportedly he was named Jacob Leon Rubenstein at birth. Reportedly he died on 3 January 1967. Some sources say he died in prison, some say he died in a hospital. Many sources ask the question, who was he, really?
The Ask.com search results page shows a Wikipedia link followed by a few words stating his birth name to be Jacob Rubenstein, but on the Wikipedia page itself his birth name is stated as Jack Leon Rubenstein. So, sometime after Ask.com’s robot last crawled over the Wikipedia page, the page was revised. Wonder why.
There is no SSDI record for a Jack Ruby, Jacob Rubenstein or Jack Rubenstein who died in 1967 or in Texas. Curiously, one Jacob Rubenstein born 1 July 0000 (year of birth unknown) died in March 1963 in an unspecified location per report issued from the District of Columbia.
Two different mug shots of Jack Ruby, one from the police and one from the sheriff, had the eyes subtly obscured or blurred.
In the late 1960’s, European newspapers printed an interview with an employee of the prison where JR was supposedly incarcerated (I realize this is anecdotal evidence and I don’t have a citation, sorry). He stated that JR didn’t actually serve his time in prison and that he was freed under a different name. This tallies with the story told by former CIA employee Frank Sneppes, author of Decent Interval, who said that Jack Ruby did not die in 1967 and that he had been given a new identity by the CIA (cited from the Covert History blog).
Too interesting!!!
That is interesting. Was LHO a sim??
SimonJCP @ Jan 18 2010, 08:16 PM wrote: Lee Harvey Oswald spoke at a Jesuit study house in Alabama during the summer of 1963. He was invited by his cousin, Eugene Murret -- a Jesuit. The "Murret" side of Oswald's family was staunchly Roman Catholic.
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/parnell/ce2649.htm
Here, Oswald spoke about favorably of Russia. Were the Jesuits setting him up? Considering that Oswald was not particularly religious, he seems to be an odd choice as a speaker. Did the Jesuits order Eugene Murret to have Oswald speak favorably of Russian Communism at their fortress in Alabama? This would further establish him as a "leftist nut".
At this point, it has been proven that Oswald was an agent of the ONI, CIA, FBI, and US Customs. All four agencies being created and run by Jesuit agents, I think it's quite clear that Oswald was manipulated by the Jesuit Order and it's intelligence community all his life.
He was also "handled" by:
James Angleton (Knight of Malta, Jesuit agent, CIA Chief, CIA-Mossad liason)
David Ferrie (Jesuit-schooled, Jesuit agent, CIA asset/operative, Marcello Henchman)
Clay Shaw (Knight of Malta, Jesuit agent, CIA officer, Former Trade Mart director)
W. Guy Banister (Freemason, JBS member, Minuteman, FBI/CIA/ONI, Jesuit agent)
The Paines (Had intimate links to the Jesuit Intelligence Community)
George De Mohrenschildt (Tied to the Jesuit Intelligence Community and Jesuit Bush)
Oswald was stationed at Atsugi Air Force Base, a hot-spot for the CIA and the CIA/Military's MKULTRA projects.
freewayrickyross @ Jun 24 2010, 10:45 PM wrote: here`s a book i found that postulates that kennedy`s assassination was a hoax that kennedy himself was in on, a slight of hand abdication
its called My God, I`m Hit: A Sherlock Holmes Approach to the Kennedy Incident on Elm Street here`s the website for the revised edition
http://mygodimhit.com/
Culto 4 Jul 21 2010, 10:23 AM wrote:Still, it does look an awful lot like the official JFK fellow. My guess is that his death was faked and he himself was a part of the act. Video and closed off streets are safe enough
The interactions between the 6 people in the limo are probably the key to debunking the JFK 'assassination'-hoax.
Here are 2 of the many visible interesting interactions:
1.) In Zapruder frames Z259 - Z267
It's best visible in this Youtube: move between 2.52 - 2.54,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MLc0udf_74
Nellie Connally opens some sort of bottle or 'cartridge' which causes a small flame (or an 'ignition') just behind John Connally's backhead.
Then a red fluid is ejected out of this 'bottle' and is sprayed upon John Connally's back.
In Z346 - Z358 Connally's 'blood-covered' back is visible as he turns towards Nellie.
It seems like this was to simulate John Connally's 'wounding', in similar way it has been done in the 'attack' on Berlusconi and Neda's 'shooting' in Iran.
2.) In Zapruder frames Z312 - Z328.
This fascinating GIF I took from The Assassination-Forum.
http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/in ... 018.0.html
The purpose of this GIF was to analyse the infamous 'White Blob', visible in the yellow marker.
However, it also shows some very interesting interactions between JFK and Jackie.
At the start of this GIF, at Z312, clearly visible is a dark-coloured 'device' on JFK's cheek. Between Z312 and Z313 this device explodes.
It's obviously an explosion, because of the appearance of:
- a very clear flash right in front of Jackie's face
- a bright flame right between Jackie and John Connally, which clearly comes from the direction of the explosion
- a cloud of white/grey smoke, or the alleged infamous 'Brain Matter'.
Jackie's left hand is suspiciously close to that 'device' at the very moment of the explosion. Looks like she is holding it to JFK's cheek.
Probably it's a so-called 'squib', especially prepared for this very event.
Right after the explosion the device kind of 'rolls up' from JFK's cheek to his temple.
This device is supposed to simulate JFK's 'headwound'. At the same time, Jackie moves her right hand quickly to JFK's neck.
At the last frame (Z328) it's clearly visible that Jackie holds some kind of white 'cord' in her right hand.
Probably this cord is meant to secure the 'headwound'-device before JFK 'slumps' to the left.
So this was an astonishing crappy way to simulate the 'headwound'.
CONCLUSION
Both 9-11 and the JFK-'murder' were simulated events. There are numerous similarities in both events:
9-11:
Plane-shaped holes and lots of 'eye-witnesses' created the illusion of 2 planes hitting the WTC.
JFK:
Some red fluid, some squibs and lots of 'eye-witnesses' created the illusion of 2 bullets hitting JFK and Connally.
In both cases an immense quantity of disinfo and all kinds of decoy-stories tend to keep people away from The Big Lie, which is:
JFK was also a Vicsim....
pegcarter 4 Nov 2 2009, 02:15 AM wrote:
The argument that the families would agitate for Justice doesn't necessarily hold up: Look at the Kennedys! Somebody got paid off!
Yeah of COURSE this clip is a simulated event cause it's been FAKED!
A real version of the Kill exists,
Culto 4 Jul 22 2010, 06:58 PM wrote: Brutal Metal Posted: Jul 22 2010, 06:24 AMYeah of COURSE this clip is a simulated event cause it's been FAKED!
A real version of the Kill exists,
What could have been, according to you, the purpose of publishing this world-famous FAKED clip
which blatantly shows the JFK 'assassination-event' was a grotesque hoax?
Return to The Nuke Hoax & the Cold War
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest