THE NUKE HOAX

[reel.deal]

NUKE-PROOF CLOUDS





guess thats the 'clouds too high' theory finished then...

[lux]

Doesn't seem like much damage to the ships either.

[Heiwa]

Yes, you wonder what happened to the ships!

Source: http://www.ctbto.org/nuclear-testing/hi ... ons-tests/

[Heiwa]

Peaceful nuclear test explosions!

Source: http://www.ctbto.org/nuclear-testing/hi ... ns/page-1/

OK, it is just a hole in a sandy beach, BUT it was caused by a nuclear explosive device, we must believe!

[lux]

We're told that just prior to the Trinity test there was the "100 ton test." This was said to be a stack of 100+ tons of TNT on a tower which was sprinkled with radioactive material and detonated, done to calibrate measuring equipment and test fallout dispersal patterns. I've not been able to find a photographic or motion picture record of this test. Has anyone seen this?

[Heiwa]

Source: http://www.ctbto.org/nuclear-testing/th ... programme/
where you find all about US nuclear tests!

[Heiwa]

Frigate Bird nuclear test explosion seen through the periscope of the submarine USS Carbonero (SS-337), Johnston Atoll, Central Pacific Ocean, 1962.
Source: http://www.ctbto.org/nuclear-testing/th ... -overview/
looks very much like:

Ivy Mike, the world's first thermonuclear test, conducted by the United States on 1 November 1952.
Source: http://www.ctbto.org/nuclear-testing/th ... programme/

[Heiwa]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6t0IpDN-jg shows alleged nuclear bomb damage at Hiroshima and Nagasaki that could as well has been caused by ordinary napalm and explosives. The footage is apparently from one or two monthes after the incidents and the movie itself two years later, i.e. plenty of time to edit to suit.

[CryptoAnarchist]

This is a great thread. I had never really considered this one, but I remember when I was 16 a Japanese exchange student told me and my friends that they never got hit by an atomic bomb, and we all thought he was crazy!

[lux]

I suspect there are many undiscovered hoaxes involved with the official "history" of WWII.

[hoi.polloi]

We're told that just prior to the Trinity test there was the "100 ton test." This was said to be a stack of 100+ tons of TNT on a tower which was sprinkled with radioactive material and detonated, done to calibrate measuring equipment and test fallout dispersal patterns. I've not been able to find a photographic or motion picture record of this test. Has anyone seen this?

Sounds like you're talking about what the "atom bomb" might really have been all along!

[corsarino]

I suspect there are many undiscovered hoaxes involved with the official "history" of WWII.

WWII is the greatest hoax of the 20th century!

Look at Dunkerque (fair play), Malta (never conquered by italians), the "sitting war" and so on...

[Rerevisionist]

I've just rechecked this site, after making a list of Google sources to a forum I manage. (If you see what I mean). The recent additions here are very high quality.

Can I ask anyone interested in what we may now call the nuke hoax to look at http://www.nukelies.com/forum where we have what I hope is a user-friendly & clear layout, which allows each part of the jigsaw to be examined - the history etc. And the most recent addition is a section on strategies to phase out the fraud - for example the 'Monterey Institute'. We also have a section on nuclear energy, which seems to be a phoney, too. And sections on the remoter implications of 'nukes' and science fraud.

Heiwa already posts with us; we'd be happy for any of you people to join and post. As Simonshack appears to do, we have a low tolerance for spam/ troll/ absurd indignation/ fake sceptics.

'Rerevisionist'

[Rerevisionist]

This is a great thread. I had never really considered this one, but I remember when I was 16 a Japanese exchange student told me and my friends that they never got hit by an atomic bomb, and we all thought he was crazy!

Probably part of the reason for making up the myth was to scare people in south east Asia. The Bitish brass were annoyed that SIngapore 'fell' quickley. And there was Malaya. In the Korean War (started 1953 I think) there was much fuss over nukes being taken there. However, it seemed to have no effect on the Chinese and/or Koreans. There was debate (if you can call controlled media grabage that) that during the Vietnam War about nukes.

BUT if you recall, after 1945 British and Japanese troops acted with the French against the Vietnamese. I suspect your Japanese exchange student was one of many who told the Chinese, Koreans, and Vietnamese that Japan had not been nuked. Maybe we are the last with the news.

[simonshack]

I've just rechecked this site, after making a list of Google sources to a forum I manage. (If you see what I mean). The recent additions here are very high quality.

Can I ask anyone interested in what we may now call the nuke hoax to look at http://www.nukelies.com/forum where we have what I hope is a user-friendly & clear layout, which allows each part of the jigsaw to be examined - the history etc. And the most recent addition is a section on strategies to phase out the fraud - for example the 'Monterey Institute'. We also have a section on nuclear energy, which seems to be a phoney, too. And sections on the remoter implications of 'nukes' and science fraud.

Heiwa already posts with us; we'd be happy for any of you people to join and post. As Simonshack appears to do, we have a low tolerance for spam/ troll/ absurd indignation/ fake sceptics.

'Rerevisionist'

Dear Rerevisionist,

I think I've been recommending your forum to our readers in the past - but perhaps my memory betrays me.
In any case, to anyone interested in the nuke hoax, I would certainly encourage everyone visiting the NUKE LIES website:

http://www.big-lies.org/NUKE-LIES/www.n ... com/forum/