THE "CHATBOX"

A place to relax and socialize - to muse, think aloud and suggest
MsQ
Member
Posts: 101
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 4:40 am

Re: THE "CHATBOX"

Unread post by MsQ »

Clues forum gets another mention in he latest Hacker Factor blog about Fotofornsics...

Besides links on my blog, FotoForensics does not advertise. People find out about it through word-of-mouth. So... when people come to FotoForensics, where do they come from? The top 10 sites that have referred people to FotoForensics are:

Reddit.com (224,120 references -- WOW!)
Facebook (83,168 references)
Google (58,483 references)
HackerFactor.com (54,584)
CluesForum.info (53,351)
Bing.com (22,958)
Baidu.com (22,182)
forum.bodybuilding.com (18,372)
imgops.com (15,500)
blog.rjssoftware.com (15,012


Cluesforum is a conspiracy and anti-conspiracy site. So it makes sense that they would want to evaluate questionable images.

http://www.hackerfactor.com/blog/index. ... nsics.html
Equinox
Banned
Posts: 549
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:45 am
Contact:

Re: THE "CHATBOX"

Unread post by Equinox »

Nice one Missq,
I notice a simple google image search of the most basic 9/11 words, will bring up a ton of research from here.
I don’t know if everyone’s searches are the same, but when I Google image search the words
“Fox 5 9/11,”
a whopping 17 images originally from this research forum appear in less than the first page.
Image
I recall reel deel, chatting to me about it in a PM, it happened all the time to him.
Equinox
Banned
Posts: 549
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:45 am
Contact:

Re: THE "CHATBOX"

Unread post by Equinox »

Ha, on a funny note.
An American TV station's regular programming has been interrupted by news of a zombie apocalypse.-

Article- http://news.sky.com/story/1050880/zombi ... television

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEcew38PU8c
MsQ
Member
Posts: 101
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 4:40 am

Re: THE "CHATBOX"

Unread post by MsQ »

Equinox wrote:Nice one Missq,
I notice a simple google image search of the most basic 9/11 words, will bring up a ton of research from here.
I don’t know if everyone’s searches are the same, but when I Google image search the words “Fox 5 9/11,”
a whopping 17 images originally from this research forum appear in less than the first page.
I just tried the same google image search. I've never googled "Fox 5 9/11" before, or "Fox 5", and don't search for anything relating to 9/11 very often either. I counted at least 11 ( B) ) Clues Forum images. I gave up counting at that point as my ADD kicked in :D
lux
Member
Posts: 1913
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 10:46 pm

Re: THE "CHATBOX"

Unread post by lux »

Have a blast -- and, some Tang!


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TWghCdIqedA
icarusinbound
Member
Posts: 393
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 8:49 am

Re: THE "CHATBOX"

Unread post by icarusinbound »

lux wrote:Have a blast -- and, some Tang!
You've given me an idea- I'm not sure if there's ever been a total listing of all commercial product placing that was squeezed out of the Gemini and Apollo programmes.

Unlike the Saturn or any unmanned missions where the advertising was just a military-industrial catwalk for the aerospace companies, the manned missions became a consumer assault campaign on a massive scale.

Omega watches, WD40 oil, Fisher 'space' pens, Hasselblad cameras...America's sugar-pill after 'winning' so unconvincingly in south-east Asia was the glittering techporn consumer gadget campaign Apollo...''One small dollar from man...one giant fleece for mankind''
lux
Member
Posts: 1913
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 10:46 pm

Re: THE "CHATBOX"

Unread post by lux »

^ I was thinking along similar lines when I found the above commercial. I'm old enough to remember a lot of this corny stuff myself. Mercury, Gemini, Apollo -- these were all over the media back in the 1960s.

Funny thing -- Kodak never tried to market "the film that went to the moon" even though it would seem an obvious product tie-in. I guess the perps didn't want the public asking too many questions about such a magical film that could survive hundreds of degrees of temperature variance and lab technicians who processed such a film would see there was no difference between "moon film" and regular film. :lol:
MrSinclair
Member
Posts: 402
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 1:29 am

Re: THE "CHATBOX"

Unread post by MrSinclair »

I too remember much of those times. It seems that a common meme that was propagated back then was how the space program would pay immeasurable benefits throughout society. As good little American children we were imbibed to the point of heady intoxication with the notion that the space program would reward us all like some interplanetary Santa Claus.

Now we look at the paucity of the whole charade and see how little was there in the first place... :blink:
icarusinbound
Member
Posts: 393
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 8:49 am

Re: THE "CHATBOX"

Unread post by icarusinbound »

MrSinclair wrote:I too remember much of those times. It seems that a common meme that was propagated back then was how the space program would pay immeasurable benefits throughout society.
I also was born into the early days of the Agency's mission to save the world through lateral technology placement. Have a look at http://spinoff.nasa.gov/spinoff/database - just leave the filters blank, and hit the search function. There's an astounding range of claimed cross-benefit technical discoveries, well over a thousand surreal claims of vindication-through-alternative-application.

There's an interesting disclaimers section within the 'Spinoffs' FAQ section where although having invented 'the ever-popular memory foam found in many consumer applications', they admit to not having invented the following- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), cordless power tools, barcodes, quartz clocks, or smoke detectors, Tang(!), Teflon, and even Velcro (Kubrick's reputed anti-gravity visual aid in '2001'), all in a kind-of self 'Mythbusters lite' vein.

This is all quietly shouted from deep within the layered mystery that is The Agency. NASA frequently reminds me of Pratchett's "Unseen University"...anyone else follow my comparison?
pov603
Member
Posts: 870
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 8:02 pm

Re: THE "CHATBOX"

Unread post by pov603 »

I wonder if anyone else on any non-mainstream sites is noticing anything such as the following?
A website forum I use regarding football [soccer] has now had 'admin' notices posted regarding complaints they are receiving from (unnamed) 'major' news agency/ies about copyright infringements because of posters 'lifting' content of news items from their webpages.
(the web site is http://www.ja606.co.uk)
It may possibly be a storm-in-a-teacup at present but I do wonder if it will start to impinge on other sites [especially this one or others like it (if there are any!)] to try and limit the ability of others to point out how inconsistent and wrong or manipulative the news agencies actually are.

Edit: Just added that you may have to 'dig' into one of the streams to see the actual notice from the admins as they have 'multi-boarded' it. So, if you are going to delve deeper, please choose one of the lesser known clubs, say,...Birmingham City?...in the Championship?...just a thought...
hoi.polloi
Member
Posts: 5060
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:24 pm

Re: THE "CHATBOX"

Unread post by hoi.polloi »

Thank you for keeping your wits about you on this matter; they will certainly flex their digital legal muscle to quiet the open, easily accessible discussion on these things.
simonshack
Administrator
Posts: 7341
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy
Contact:

Re: THE "CHATBOX"

Unread post by simonshack »

lux wrote: Funny thing -- Kodak never tried to market "the film that went to the moon" even though it would seem an obvious product tie-in. I guess the perps didn't want the public asking too many questions about such a magical film that could survive hundreds of degrees of temperature variance and lab technicians who processed such a film would see there was no difference between "moon film" and regular film. :lol:
Excellent point. In fact, this single point - all by itself - suffices to debunk NASA's Apollo fables. No film rolls could possibly have survived a trip to the moon. Period.
Equinox
Banned
Posts: 549
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:45 am
Contact:

Re: THE "CHATBOX"

Unread post by Equinox »

Simon,
Can you please check your facebook inbox, when you get a chance?
Cheers :)
Equinox
Banned
Posts: 549
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:45 am
Contact:

Re: THE "CHATBOX"

Unread post by Equinox »

.
Last edited by Equinox on Sun Feb 17, 2013 7:37 am, edited 2 times in total.
Equinox
Banned
Posts: 549
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:45 am
Contact:

Re: THE "CHATBOX"

Unread post by Equinox »

hoi.polloi wrote:Hey, Equinox, would you mind posting this on Facebook for us, please?

You're such an enormous help in every way, we could really use your help spreading the word and blocking the shills who question you for posting this! I think admitting you are partially simulated by 9/11 technology would actually be a really great wake up call for Facebook readers. I am asking, in the spirit of Simon's diplomacy, and despite my protestations, for a sort of temporary 'truce' between us - you can represent the "simulation" investigating itself from the inside, and we can represent genuine humanity watching artificial intelligence advance. How about that?

Here's your first assignment, post this on your Facebook and explain how you're a really advanced sim.

Thanks a bunch, you're so helpful! :wub:



Image



Image
Left eye higher than right. Left eye lower than right?

Ahh, Hoi she is actually squinting in one photo, probably because of the flash?
But she and many people squint in photos, all the time! That’s why one photo the eye is rounder and appears higher. And the other it is squinted and appears lower.
Circle -
Those wrinkles missing around the temples, are fact of life. They are called “crows feet”
Research it- https://www.google.com.au/search?q=crow ... kQW7koHABw

You can call crow's feet "laugh lines" or "character lines, they appear when people smile and squint their eyes, the more you smile the more the lines appear.
One way to avoid crow's feet would be to never smile, laugh, frown or squint. :o



Spiky one second, curly the next? :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
How can people take you seriously with all of this.
YES hoi, its a little thing called, "wetting my hair under a bathroom sink!" Nothing wrong with trying to look fresh on a date in the big apple. Both photos were taken some time apart. Is that what we call pro analysis? Left eye, lower than right? lol :rolleyes: Oh, this is exact stuff I am talking about! It looks so bad to the reader!

This is disgusting! placing long term members girlfriends photos, compiling in a dodgy analysis and then claiming they are sims. <_<

It is an insult to 9/11 research and justice as a whole.

-- FAIL --
Look at my videos from the same camera!!!!!
YOUR SAYING THE VIDEOS OF US ARE FAKE AS WELL!!!!
Image
Image


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lGyK8pYti8


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Yk6UWgYgy4



fail... :lol:
Hoi you believe I'am a sim
Hoping to lead the investigation and run it into the ground
I run this page for two years with 800 fans....
The man that produced September Clues supports it.

http://www.facebook.com/pages/September ... 7375501007

People comment on there all of the time, every few minutes........

Image

Actually the personal messages I'm getting from people on there since you placed up the dodgy analysis, seem to say YOUR the one running it into the ground, some say its shill behaviour, It's not good at all Hoi....... <_<
Post Reply