CC, it's not enough to just believe or declare a photo fake, we have to be able to demonstrate it clearly & unequivocally — with images of the same scene from the same or very similar perspective. Those you posted are really all too different; in elevation, distance, angles etc. Yes, your last post with the Leaning Towers of Taipei is very weird; but could you explain exactly why you believe it couldn't be a real photo to a guest just reading this topic?Cobra Commander wrote:Maat,Maat wrote: One can't really determine what discrepancies there might be in images with entirely different view perspectives, CC. Zoom lenses can also make distant objects seem closer (would need more views from that bridge to compare). What does seem odd, though, if that debris and "wing" part is supposed to be right at the spot it "crashed" through, there's not even a mark on the barrier — but it "vaporised" a light pole?
I understand and took that into consideration (Verrazano 9/11 debate), but the additional structures around that factory structure is inconsistent in multiple pictures tells me these are fake backgrounds.
That is clearly the same building in both photos.
The background images just keep changing, and that building with the aluminum chimney stack is missing from the second pic, as is the building directly to the left of the building in both pics. Also, where is that bridge that we see on the other side of the river, as posted in my previous post?
Anyway, the buildings still seem way too close even with the zoom issue and different lenses in the first pic.
I see this as smoking gun photo fakery for the Taipei psy-op, and that's not even counting the tampered with debris in my last post.
If anybody can find the higher resolution and larger pic of the 2nd photo, please post it for me. I've seen it before, but can't find it again.
Re the images of debris on the road, from different directions — there's no way to know what the timeline was supposed to be, so how would one prove it wasn't moved, run over, taken or messed with by passers by, for example. The evidence has to be irrefutable & undebunkable before we can call anything a "smoking gun".
To find other sizes of images, just drag & drop it into Google search & then "search by image"; e.g. that Getty image of the river (can't be hotlinked): http://www.gettyimages.com/editorial/cl ... r-pictures