Boston Marathon- alLEGed "terror attack"- Apr15, 2013

Discussing the most relevant "sequels" or "reminders" of 9/11. The so-called "War On Terror" is a global scam finalized to manipulate this world's population with crass fear-mongering tactics designed to scare you shitless.

Re: Boston Marathon - alleged "terror attack" - April 15, 20

Postby anonjedi2 on April 26th, 2013, 7:36 pm

the unidentified photos in animated gif sequence:

Image
anonjedi2
Member
 
Posts: 698
Joined: December 31st, 2012, 6:50 am

Re: Boston Marathon - alleged "terror attack" - April 15, 20

Postby agraposo on April 26th, 2013, 7:39 pm

hoi.polloi wrote:I don't suppose anyone was at work? This place looks a bit creepy. Simmy, I mean. And not an easy way to just download the vicsim-like boxy pictures, which by the way aren't all there in more ways than one.

Nearly 100 employees work at the staffing firm’s Back Bay office at 711 Boylston St., and with its clear view of the finish line, most who were there on Patriots Day witnessed the explosions and their immediate aftermath.

http://www.bizjournals.com/boston/news/2013/04/22/aquent-president-says-firm-relying-on.html

More images from the company's President:
ImageImage
http://www.bizjournals.com/boston/print-edition/2013/04/26/aquent-employees-keep-firm-running.html
agraposo
Member
 
Posts: 241
Joined: June 10th, 2011, 10:48 pm

Re: Boston Marathon - alleged "terror attack" - April 15, 20

Postby Maat on April 26th, 2013, 7:59 pm

Yes Hoi, it is weird. Refreshing the main page http://www.aquent.com/ gets different slogans, e.g.

"Hire Designers Who Totally Get What You Meme", "Hire Writers Who Create With Sharpened Pixels" or "Hire Developers With Their Heads In The Cloud"

Very interesting: http://www.aquent.com/hire-talent/interactive-ux-graphic-design-na.htm

"Founded in 1986", according to Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aquent

http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Aquent :-
Aquent [′ā·kwənt]
(geology)
A suborder of the soil order Entisol, bluish gray or greenish gray in color; under water until very recent times; located at the margins of oceans, lakes, or seas.

Entisol [′ent·ə‚sȯl]
(geology)
An order of soil having few or faint horizons.

Named after an obscure kind of dirt? :blink:
Maat
Moderator
 
Posts: 1423
Joined: September 9th, 2010, 2:14 am

Re: Boston Marathon - alleged "terror attack" - April 15, 20

Postby sunshine05 on April 26th, 2013, 9:35 pm

I wrote a quick article this morning about the marathon's finish times. As many of you are aware, the media reported that the runners were diverted approximately 7 minutes after the first explosion. The "explosion" was at 4:09 (4 hours, 9 minutes) which corresponded to 2:50PM; therefore the runners were diverted at 2:57PM (4:16). However, if you look at the recorded times of the runners, there is NO interruption to the race and runners continue to cross the line and have recorded times for a full 35 minutes post "bomb" until 4:44. Is this in any way logical?

Here's a link to the marathon's times: http://www.marathonguide.com/results/br ... D=15130415

http://sandyhooktruth.wordpress.com/201 ... screpancy/
sunshine05
Member
 
Posts: 298
Joined: January 28th, 2013, 7:00 pm

Re: Boston Marathon - alleged "terror attack" - April 15, 20

Postby JLapage on April 26th, 2013, 9:59 pm

anonjedi2 wrote:the unidentified photos in animated gif sequence:

Image


Is the bomber that dumb that he has to be present at the spot where he detonated the 'bomb'? An alleged terrorist with his pressure cooker bomb (WMD :D ) that never heard of remotely controlled bombs? How come he is healthy enough to run the hell outta there and yet the people (or pixels ;) ) around him are rolling around on the ground with their fake injuries? I know it has already been mentioned, but how does the 'bomb' which allegedly exploded closer to the street shatter the Lens Crafters glass in the direction of where the explosion took place (that is toward the bomb and not away from it)? In this animated gif I don't see the blue tarp covering the side fence, but in several videos you can see that the 'bomb' did nothing to that tarp. I heard the aredondo de Los Angeles guy (The declared hero of this fakery) say that it was an IED intended to cause massive destruction, fatalities and injuries and yet this horrible 'bomb' (WMD) left not a single dent in the concrete :blink: :huh: :puke:
Last edited by JLapage on April 26th, 2013, 10:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
JLapage
Member
 
Posts: 115
Joined: April 23rd, 2013, 2:38 pm

Re: Boston Marathon - alleged "terror attack" - April 15, 20

Postby JLapage on April 26th, 2013, 10:09 pm

sunshine05 wrote:I wrote a quick article this morning about the marathon's finish times. As many of you are aware, the media reported that the runners were diverted approximately 7 minutes after the first explosion. The "explosion" was at 4:09 (4 hours, 9 minutes) which corresponded to 2:50PM; therefore the runners were diverted at 2:57PM (4:16). However, if you look at the recorded times of the runners, there is NO interruption to the race and runners continue to cross the line and have recorded times for a full 35 minutes post "bomb" until 4:44. Is this in any way logical?

Here's a link to the marathon's times: http://www.marathonguide.com/results/br ... D=15130415

http://sandyhooktruth.wordpress.com/201 ... screpancy/


I have a feeling that the marathon was diverted from the regular finish line for most of the runners. It was never interrupted as such. The alternate route was all ready to be used. Someone posted (in this thread) that an alternate route was available, and I am suggesting that the runners were seamlessly directed to that alternate route.That may be why they are using these photoshopped photos showing the runners at the regular finish line. The regular finish line was reserved for the perps to take some real life videos and photos to combine with their pre-recorded ones ??? :unsure:
JLapage
Member
 
Posts: 115
Joined: April 23rd, 2013, 2:38 pm

Re: Boston Marathon - alleged "terror attack" - April 15, 20

Postby anonjedi2 on April 26th, 2013, 11:07 pm

So we are asked to believe that these individuals are all the same Jeff Bauman?

ImageImage

http://www.publiusforum.com/2013/04/20/ ... g-suspect/

Image
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/04 ... ?mobile=nc

Image
http://dailyridge.com/category/national-news/

He sure does love that shirt, doesn't he? :rolleyes:
Last edited by anonjedi2 on April 27th, 2013, 12:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
anonjedi2
Member
 
Posts: 698
Joined: December 31st, 2012, 6:50 am

Re: Boston Marathon - alleged "terror attack" - April 15, 20

Postby Maat on April 26th, 2013, 11:45 pm

▲ Yes of course they are "all the same Jeff Bauman" character, because it's not an "individual" but a CGI creation, i.e. not "photographs" of a real "person".

Please add the webpage source for all images you post.
Maat
Moderator
 
Posts: 1423
Joined: September 9th, 2010, 2:14 am

Re: Boston Marathon - alleged "terror attack" - April 15, 20

Postby Frost on April 26th, 2013, 11:58 pm

I like this one. Three days after accident from skeleton he got fatter then ever!

Image
Frost
Member
 
Posts: 42
Joined: August 17th, 2012, 3:42 pm

Re: Boston Marathon - alleged "terror attack" - April 15, 20

Postby anonjedi2 on April 27th, 2013, 12:01 am

Maat,

I've updated my post to include the original sources. I don't entirely agree that it's 100% CGI. At some point I do feel like there will be a real "Jeff Bauman" making the rounds on Oprah, Letterman and such. I do hold space for an element of CGI to all of this but I think a real individual is plausible as well.
anonjedi2
Member
 
Posts: 698
Joined: December 31st, 2012, 6:50 am

Re: Boston Marathon - alleged "terror attack" - April 15, 20

Postby analucia on April 27th, 2013, 2:46 am

simonshack wrote:
Fedge wrote:Another prebomb picture, this one from two days before ^^
(source: http://www.lucidsportsfan.com/2013_04_14_archive.html)
Image

.

As I saw the above picture ('from two days before', apparently) posted by our member Fedge, I wondered: why in the world did they take down that huge monitor for the Big Day? Today, a pen pal from UK (and our latest new Cluesforum member, 'kickstones') sent me some interesting material regarding this monitor. So here goes:



THE BIG MONITOR MYSTERY

FACT: This big monitor is not seen in any of the available "bomb" imagery. It's just not there.

Image

Image


Here's a picture of the large monitor: https://twitter.com/annwebster/status/3 ... 20/photo/1

Next, I wondered why on earth this still image of the female winner of this 2013 Boston Marathon looked photoshopped - and the possible reasons as to why it would have been manipulated. As it is, it looks as if the backdrop has been replaced to simulate a photo taken with a big telephoto lens, a most unlikely choice for any pro-photographer in these circumstances (also, the backdrop would appear much more blurred than this with, say, a 500mm lens). To be sure, the background buildings we can see in this Boylston street scenery are located further down the road. Thus, in this 'money shot' of the Marathon winner, the nearby "bomb" area is invisible (out of frame) - and so is (conveniently, perhaps?) the big monitor:

Image

The thing is, in this video (found by 'kickstones') showing the 2013 winner lady, the monitor is still there:
http://boston.cbslocal.com/video/877547 ... -division/

Image

So the question is: was this huge monitor removed / dismounted at some stage after the marathon frontrunners had crossed the finish line? If so, why? It certainly seems highly unlikely that it was removed while crowds of spectators were still walking around in that area (in which the "bomb" supposedly exploded). So what's going on here? Was this perhaps a major cock-up by the image crafters of the "bombing" imagery (which obviously was crafted days/weeks in advance of the event) who used Boylston streetviews /templates - unaware that this big monitor would be raised on the day?

In any case, we may have found a plausible motive for the apparent photoshopping of the 'money shot' of the marathon winner - and other photographic material prior to the timeframe of the "bombing".


I can tell you from experience, Sponsors like John Hancock pay tens of thousands and even hundreds of thousands of dollars for title sponsorships to large events, which is why you see John Hancock all over the place. The video screen is what's known as an activation of their sponsorship. There is no way that video screen would have been removed before the entire event is over, especially not during a race. Besides the loss of impressions that would happen from early removal, that the sponsorship/marketing people are expecting to get to the end of the race, it would be a logistical nightmare to get it down safely during the race. It is most likely a LED screen so images can easily be seen during the daylight from all different angles. And this video screen is OFFICIAL, as you can see here in the event PDF on page 3.
http://216.235.243.43/races/boston-marathon/~/media/Files/BAA/Races/Boston%20Marathon/2013SpectatorGuide.pdf
"FINISH AREA
The final 100 meters of the race is lined with bleacher
seating. However, this area is reserved for race officials
and invited guests. The Charles River (north) side of
Boylston Street is open to the general public, and many
fans arrive at the finish area in the early hours of the
morning to secure the best viewing area. Spectators
planning to view the race from this area should plan
accordingly, and be aware of the many parking restrictions.
A viewing area for persons with disabilities is located at
the corner of Hereford and Boylston Streets. This area is
adjacent to the Boston EMS Medical Tent and the fire station.
Principal race sponsor John Hancock furnishes the finish
area with a large video monitor, enabling spectators to
watch a broadcast of the race while they await the arrival
of all the finishers. The screen is located on Boylston Street
at the intersection of Exeter Street, opposite the Boston Public Library."

I have downloaded the PDF, I just need to figure out how to embed or attach to this post, in case anything happens to the online PDF.

I believe the discovery of this "missing" video screen in all of the videos and photos of the faked bombing scenario is a HUGE SMOKING GUN. That screen should have been there. The fact it is gone points out, either they were hoping no one would notice in the faked photographs, or when they realized since it literally projects a display of the race real time, it might be too difficult to mask the production that was happening in plain sight and too difficult to make a real life projection happen during a faked/staged photo/video op and it come off as legitimate, that couldn't be tracked back and show an absolute fake image on the screen. Because if indeed these photos were all faked, there would be no way to predict what actually should be showing on the video screen at the exact moment of the explosion until it was actually happening in reality.
analucia
Member
 
Posts: 29
Joined: April 26th, 2013, 11:03 pm

Re: Boston Marathon - alleged "terror attack" - April 15, 20

Postby Maat on April 27th, 2013, 2:59 am

anonjedi2 wrote:Maat,

I don't entirely agree that it's 100% CGI. At some point I do feel like there will be a real "Jeff Bauman" making the rounds on Oprah, Letterman and such. I do hold space for an element of CGI to all of this but I think a real individual is plausible as well.

Anonjedi2,

It really makes no difference whether the "Jeff Bauman" character might be rendered over/played by an actor in some form later or not; the fact remains that the fabricated entity being literally sold to the public is obviously non-existent. As I said on my post re the TeamStork pic, if it were a real, pre-existing photo, why would it be manipulated at all! : viewtopic.php?p=2383453#p2383453

Their real "masterpieces" are on the "Jeff Bauman" Fakebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1043692236 :-

Image
http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?i ... 643a.71525

http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?i ... 17b7.47238
Image
▲What's happened to the left thumb? And how can a light reflection/beam from the window behind "him" show in front of the sleeve?

More on "Auntie's" page (mixed bag of shoop rainbows), oh so real :rolleyes: : https://www.facebook.com/jenniferjoycemaybury :-

Image
http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?i ... 428.163820 ____________________________["fairy lights" ▲]

Image
Creepy arm! http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?i ... 5ac.104248

Image
http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?i ... ca3.134183

To familiarize yourself with just how realistic CGI images can be made to look, check these out (click on any image for full size): http://www.cgtrader.com/blog/2013/02/27/grab-an-inspiration-30-most-photorealistic-3d-renderings/
Maat
Moderator
 
Posts: 1423
Joined: September 9th, 2010, 2:14 am

Re: Boston Marathon - alleged "terror attack" - April 15, 20

Postby analucia on April 27th, 2013, 4:06 am

[ADMIN: Quoted posts removed for cleanliness. -HP]

I have found more photos which further establish what I think is a ANOTHER SMOKING GUN as to the authenticity of the photos of the faked "bomb/explosion" photos.

Legit photos that show the base of the photographer walkway is approximately at the horizontal lines that run just ABOVE the bottom arched entrances and tops of the square windows and the top white canopies are approximately 3/4 of the way up the top of the upper arched windows.
#1
Image
Link: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=262549217215813&set=a.262549047215830.1073741826.168903493247053&type=1&theater
#2 Link: Image
http://www.washingtonblade.com/content/files/2013/04/Brian_Beary_and_Lennie_Carter_in_Boston_Marathon_insert_courtesy_Lennie_Carter.jpg
http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/04/16/gay-boston-marathon-runners-unhurt-by-bombings/brian_beary_and_lennie_carter_in_boston_marathon_insert_courtesy_lennie_carter/


FAKE PHOTOS:
#1 Link: Image
http://www.huseby.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/512px-Boston_Marathon_bombing_first_bomb_site_54_minute_before_explosion.jpg http://www.huseby.com/blog/ Scroll down to Apr 22 post to see thumbnail of photo. Interesting? Who is Aaron Tang (via CNN)? He also has fake photos after the bombing, where this one is listed as 54 minutes before. Notice again the base of the photographer walkway is now aligned with the horizontal lines at the bases of the square windows. And what is all the white haze on the right of the photo just below here? It looks like ghosting that happens from using the stamp tool in Photoshop to me, it's obviously some residual from the doctoring of the photo.
#2 Link: Image
http://localtvwqad.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/boston-marathon-finish-line-photo-by-aaron-tang-via-cnn.jpg
http://wqad.com/2013/04/16/photos-explosions-near-finish-line-of-boston-marathon/ Photo 21 of 28
#3 Link:Image
http://localtvwqad.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/boston-marathon-photo-by-jim-bardin-via-cnn.jpg Photo 10 of 28
#4 Image
Link: http://yallconnect.com/2013/04/15/boston-marathon-tragedy-glimpses-through-tweets/

I swear I remember reading about downloading the photos we post and sending them somewhere so they can be embedded in the post so they don't disappear later, but I can't find the post now. I have downloaded all these. Simon, any help with that?
analucia
Member
 
Posts: 29
Joined: April 26th, 2013, 11:03 pm

Re: Boston Marathon - alleged "terror attack" - April 15, 20

Postby hoi.polloi on April 27th, 2013, 4:38 am

Perhaps you don't want me to help, but below the Preview and Submit buttons there is a tab called "Upload attachment".

From there you can upload images one at a time, then additional dialogues are added in the same area, allowing you to "post inline". Click on that button to make a link to your new attachment.

Also, please don't quote a bunch of pictures and then comment on virtually unrelated topics. It's making the thread hard to read.

This thread is occasionally getting clogged with imagery, with hardly any analysis. Please slow down, people. Pick your battles. For example, if you are researching an alleged photographer, weigh how necessary it is to post every one of their pictures instead of just posting some typed information.

If you abuse our board, even if you have good intentions, you may have to be suspended just for being "clumsy". Readers cannot afford nonsense and information jamming.
hoi.polloi
Administrator
 
Posts: 4810
Joined: November 14th, 2010, 8:24 pm

Re: Boston Marathon - alleged "terror attack" - April 15, 20

Postby hoi.polloi on April 27th, 2013, 4:47 am

Image


Image
hoi.polloi
Administrator
 
Posts: 4810
Joined: November 14th, 2010, 8:24 pm

PreviousNext

Return to London, Madrid, Oslo and other faked terror events: the psyops are everywhere

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests