Dcopymope wrote:Sorry, I usually ignore anyone throwing vain insults at me, administrator or not. I don't feel they deserve my attention. I don't use Facebook so I'm not sure exactly how it works, some are claiming that they changed the name of the page after this incident happened, yet I see no proof of this anywhere on the pages, as some have pointed out that if this is indeed the case then it would say "Member changed the name of this group to......this". The perps may be clever, but that doesnt mean they always pull off their hoaxes without mistakes. The grossly inconsistent/contradictory 9/11 footage is a prime example.
It might be a genuine error. But then don't you think it would have disappeared by now? And why the lazy youtube videos? You know they immediately stink of phony research.
BTW, maybe my post didn't sound too nice, and I'm sorry. But I didn't throw any vain insult. I merely said that the alleged proof that "could conclusively prove" that there were fake victims (how?) was total bullcrap. And I stand by it. Besides it was kind of manipulative to propose this as proof when much better research is going on in the thread in fruitful directions. This doesn't mean it is not interesting to learn that this facebook page was out there. But I'd file it with the background noise meant to distract the research.