Maat wrote:analucia wrote:
Maat,
I understand what you're saying regarding a caricature they have created. My question is to what lengths they have undergone creating that caricature. And maybe we disagree on the cowboy, I think he's a real person, but an actor.
Yes, Analucia, Cowboy Arredondo is clearly one of their agents acting the role of “rescuer/witness” for green-screen “interviews” (with already established back story as “peace activist/Occupy protester”). But only his
image was used in the
cgi animations and
composite stills of the Boston “bomb scenes” to lend more “realism” to the deception by
cognitive association.
The animated movies and stills contain
no actors because
no real people or physical “staging” were necessary to make the “bomb scene” events or “victims” with cgi software.
This is what confuses people as it was obviously intended to do!
analucia wrote: Could they have a wheelchair with either a dummy that has body parts and Moulage makeup and they cgi'd the face on the dummy or perhaps an amputee actor with fake Moulage injuries so the cowboy actor has something real to hold/tourniquet and then the amputee actor has a skintight, green face/head cover
No, why bother with such complicated machinations and backstopping nightmares when it can all be done with computer graphic programs? (ref 9/11, Oslo/Utoya, Arizona etc.).
Can we please purge this "amputee actor" nonsense from intelligent discussion once and for all? A
real amputee would be known to others already, therefore could not be used to play a "Boston Victim", unless they're a Salamander or an Axolotl FFS!
analucia wrote: - think Green Man on It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia - and this Jeff Bauman, who has sold his image to the perps to use, and then they cgi his face for the footage/images we are fed through mainstream media. That way they get some sort of interaction between actors and caricatures and realism in perspective of the bone jutting out, etc., much like we see in the movies or TV like The Walking Dead, in the footage/photos while creating their deception.
Movies and TV shows are not a relevant comparison with secret ops trying to pretend the scenes & characters shown are real. Movie actors are pre-existing people known in reality; PsyOp “victims” are not (with rare exceptions) and any agent/actor “witnesses/rescuers” are obviously few (in relation to the size of the Op, e.g. more for 9/11).
There are no real photos or videos of “Jeff Bauman”! if any of the “photos” shown of that character were of a real person, why are they
all faked? If “Bauman” existed to provide "his" image or “act” any role, why is there no real,
moving footage of him that is recognizable, close up or lasting more than
6 seconds?
analucia wrote: And there are other actors in the scene, the set, with moulage makeup, all amidst trash and fake blood, to help create a sense of realism for the video/photos where cgi is inserted post-production to fully create the deception. Do you consider that a possibility in your analyses?
No. Please think and study the images
again in light of what I've explained above and in previous posts.
Do you see Arredondo’s
face in any video or stills
on/at the “bomb scene”, or only the distinctive “hat” & “flag” for recognition?
All the images shown of the supposed “events” at the “bomb scene” are computer artwork creations — not "live film" or real "photographs" of
anything.
What would be easier for them to do with the fewest possible people required to know, i.e. for minimum risk & total containment?
Remember KISS, Keep It Simple Stupid; the perps obviously know it well.
)
and then WORSE, she started saying that 9/11 was a conspiracy against muslims. 
How many things can we be scared of at once? 
