Fakery in Orbit: THE I$$

If NASA faked the moon landings, does the agency have any credibility at all? Was the Space Shuttle program also a hoax? Is the International Space Station another one? Do not dismiss these hypotheses offhand. Check out our wider NASA research and make up your own mind about it all.
reel.deal
DELETED THEIR OWN POSTS :(
Posts: 1292
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:42 am
Contact:

Re: ENDEAVOUR - and the spaced-out NASA efforts

Unread post by reel.deal »

EPIC LONG-EXPOSURE CAPTURING THE LUMINOUS RADIANT BEAUTY OF THE X-FIGHTER & DEATH STAR & FAR-AWAY GALAXIES
FROM "NO-STARS WARS II" - THE ENDEAVOURS SKIES BLACK.
Image

THE AWESOME POWER OF 'THE FORCE' IS FULLY REVEALED IN THIS BRIGHTNESS/CONTRAST ADJUSTED DETAIL...
THE PHANTOM DEATH-STAR, THE DEATH-STAR, AND THE X-FIGHTER ALL DESTROY EACH OTHER WITH LASERS
SIMULTANEOUSLY IN A PERFECT ISOCELES TRIANGULAR CO-ORDINATE TRIPLE K.O. EXTINCTION-MOMENT.
Image

http://www.theatlantic.com/infocus/2011 ... is/100111/
:P

Image

Thanx to Neil, Buzz & Mike, EVERYONE KNOWS you cant see any stars "FROM SPACE ", :huh: :unsure: :o
& thanx to NA$As' ISS... we all now know you can see THE STARWARS DEATH STAR,
instead...
:P

so... thats a '30 second exposure', steady as a rock, of THE MILKY WAY !!!... 'from the ISS', in 2003. :huh:
and now TODAY, we have 'THE STARS', in a '1 second exposure' of the INDIA/PAKISTAN BORDER.
PLUS, those 2 other 'shuttle-docking' with stars in background.
4 pictures. WITH 'REAL' STARS.
1 SECOND EXPOSURES.
;)
reel.deal
DELETED THEIR OWN POSTS :(
Posts: 1292
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:42 am
Contact:

Re: ENDEAVOUR - and the spaced-out NASA efforts

Unread post by reel.deal »

astronut wrote:
reel.deal wrote:Image
Exposure Time: 300/10 sec.
Yup, long exposure. Thanks for proving my point!
so... in 2003 an ISS NA$A Nikon needed 30 seconds exposure time to capture stars,
while in 2011 an ISS NA$A Nikon needed a 1 second exposure time to capture stars.

:lol:
Heiwa
Banned
Posts: 1062
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 6:20 pm
Contact:

Re: ENDEAVOUR - and the spaced-out NASA efforts

Unread post by Heiwa »

I cannot understand that, if you cannot see or photograph the stars from the Moon, how can you see and photograph them from Earth? Or from a satellite. How can the Hubble satellite see anything? :rolleyes:
astronut
Banned
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 3:49 pm

Re: ENDEAVOUR - and the spaced-out NASA efforts

Unread post by astronut »

reel.deal wrote:
astronut wrote:
reel.deal wrote:Image
Exposure Time: 300/10 sec.
Yup, long exposure. Thanks for proving my point!
so... in 2003 an ISS NA$A Nikon needed 30 seconds exposure time to capture stars,
while in 2011 an ISS NA$A Nikon needed a 1 second exposure time to capture stars.

:lol:
How many stars do you want to capture? You'll capture a lot more in 30 seconds than in 1 second, regardless of the year.
astronut
Banned
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 3:49 pm

Re: ENDEAVOUR - and the spaced-out NASA efforts

Unread post by astronut »

Heiwa wrote:I cannot understand that, if you cannot see or photograph the stars from the Moon, how can you see and photograph them from Earth? Or from a satellite. How can the Hubble satellite see anything? :rolleyes:
You can photograph stars from the moon, just not at the same time that you record the daylit surface of the moon - the latter will be dramatically over-exposed in any image set to capture stars.
simonshack
Administrator
Posts: 7341
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy
Contact:

Re: ENDEAVOUR - and the spaced-out NASA efforts

Unread post by simonshack »

astronut wrote:
simonshack wrote:*

Dear Astronut,

I kindly asked you to introduce yourself here: http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=838
Please do so - as every new member is required to give a minimum of background of him/herself. Thanks.
There. Told you all you need to know.
Oh thanks, dear Astronut. That was a fine effort from you: <_<
Let me hazard a guess - since your obnoxious arrogance (what with calling me a liar and such) has already bored the wits out of me:

Are you by any chance the "amateur astronomer" credited with this droll image published on NASA's website?
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/juno/ ... 0808a.html
Image

Great job catching the stars, Scott! :P
So are you Scott Ferguson, dear Astronut? Or is that "scottaferguson@...." e-mail addy of yours just a coincidence? Also, and since we are at it, are you by any chance related to this guy? :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Ferguson
"Ferguson was assigned as commander of STS-135, which was the final mission of the space shuttle program."
Just asking - since YOU asked for it.
HonestlyNow
Member
Posts: 473
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:15 pm

Re: ENDEAVOUR - and the spaced-out NASA efforts

Unread post by HonestlyNow »

. . . are you by any chance related to this guy?
From Christopher Ferguson Wikipedia page
Personal
Ferguson, who is of Polish descent, is married to Sandra and has three children. When he was in space for his wedding anniversary, NASA played the Frankie Valli song "Can't Take My Eyes Off You" as the wake-up music that morning, after which Ferguson wished his wife a happy anniversary.
How Sweet! (??????)
whatsgoingon
DELETED THEIR OWN POSTS :(
Posts: 576
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 7:56 pm

Re: ENDEAVOUR - and the spaced-out NASA efforts

Unread post by whatsgoingon »

a
Last edited by whatsgoingon on Fri May 24, 2013 8:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
astronut
Banned
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 3:49 pm

Re: ENDEAVOUR - and the spaced-out NASA efforts

Unread post by astronut »

simonshack wrote: Let me hazard a guess - since your obnoxious arrogance (what with calling me a liar and such) '
Well, you did lie about the number of bolts that secures the shuttle to the external tank, I'm still left wondering why.
simonshack wrote: Are you by any chance the "amateur astronomer" credited with this droll image published on NASA's website?
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/juno/ ... 0808a.html
Image
Indeed I am. You can cut the sarcasm crap, I'm an amateur astronomer, just like it says. That particular image was also picked up by Universe Today.
http://www.universetoday.com/88524/firs ... -portrait/

I was wondering if you would resort to searching around about my real identity under the pretenses that I'm posting dishonestly, sure enough you lived down to expectations.
simonshack wrote: Also, and since we are at it, are you by any chance related to this guy? :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Ferguson
"Ferguson was assigned as commander of STS-135, which was the final mission of the space shuttle program."
Just asking - since YOU asked for it.
No, I didn't ask for it. And no, I'm not related to shuttle commander Christopher Ferguson, but more relevantly to the thread, I did capture STS-135 and gained a fair bit of attention for it as an amateur astronomer.
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badas ... -daylight/
http://www.zmescience.com/space/video-t ... -daylight/
Last edited by astronut on Wed Feb 22, 2012 3:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
astronut
Banned
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 3:49 pm

Re: ENDEAVOUR - and the spaced-out NASA efforts

Unread post by astronut »

reel.deal wrote: i like it.
if this is what it takes to authentically replicate what the naked eye sees...
then why are NA$A too dumb to EVER do it themselves ?!?
Actually it shows you far more than the naked eye sees... and NASA does do it themselves:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120120095 ... psky.shtml
reel.deal wrote: why cant NA$A stack long exposures to replicate the authentic EARTH IN SPACE WITH STARS view ?
If you take a long exposure while pointed at earth from the shuttle or ISS, all you'll see is white. Earth is very bright. Now, you can include earth in the view when on the night side, but if you stack multiple images earth will be blurred.
Image
Makkonen
Member
Posts: 575
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 9:21 pm

Re: ENDEAVOUR - and the spaced-out NASA efforts

Unread post by Makkonen »

astronut wrote:Image
But this is an animation...
astronut
Banned
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 3:49 pm

Re: ENDEAVOUR - and the spaced-out NASA efforts

Unread post by astronut »

Makkonen wrote:
astronut wrote:Image
But this is an animation...
That is an "animation" only in the sense that it is multiple photographs put together into a timelapse. This too is a timelapse animation, that doesn't mean it's fake:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AnIyMCAYHM
lux
Member
Posts: 1913
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 10:46 pm

Re: ENDEAVOUR - and the spaced-out NASA efforts

Unread post by lux »

astronaut, how many photos have you taken of stars from the surface of the moon?

And, how many photos have you taken of Earth from the ISS or shuttle?
reel.deal
DELETED THEIR OWN POSTS :(
Posts: 1292
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:42 am
Contact:

Re: ENDEAVOUR - and the spaced-out NASA efforts

Unread post by reel.deal »

these ISS NIKON aurora stitched timelapse frames, showing stars, are "1 second exposures";
which kinda throws all previous 'no stars' NA$A 'exposure-lengths' photography into disarray...
without the 'corrupting excessive ambient light' of the Earth in frame.

Hubble is incapable of masking out Earth to capture Earths true stellar backdrop ?
yet can mask out the sun, & show collossal sunflares explode beyond the corona...

:lol:

better hurry up with the next-gen space-shuttles; they need to rendezvous with Hubble, pronto;
to deliver & upgrade a $2Billion black poster-painted circle of cardboard cut out of a cereal box...

:ph34r:
lux
Member
Posts: 1913
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 10:46 pm

Re: ENDEAVOUR - and the spaced-out NASA efforts

Unread post by lux »

astronut wrote: That is an "animation" only in the sense that it is multiple photographs put together into a timelapse.
Multiple photographs of what? Taken from what? What are the near-geometrically arranged bright spots? What is the blue arch-shaped object? Are you saying you took these photographs? What does this "timelapse" have to do with the discussion?

And, please answer the other 2 questions I asked earlier, which are ...
lux wrote:astronaut, how many photos have you taken of stars from the surface of the moon?

And, how many photos have you taken of Earth from the ISS or shuttle?
Post Reply