Alex_ro. First of all: calm down.alex_ro wrote:That was completely uncalled for. Like Heiwa, you only show your ignorance.nonhocapito wrote:It's a pity the picture does not include the giant coffee table the earth is sitting on
People believing in the flatness of the Earth were always a minority. But you were brainwashed by atheists to think that science have always made progress. So that the ancients were fools and you are smart.
So in your view, Socrates and Plato SHOULDN'T be studied. And Euclid's geometry should be trashed away. Along with Pythagoras et al. Right?
Of course, you would have to also trash away ALL THE THINGS IN THE WORLD (incl. your iPod and iPhone and your home), but you wouldn’t mind, would you?
After all, those ancient guys were so primitive. We should finally get rid of them, right?
So unevolved… Enough to make pyramids that no one today can replicate.
You are so deep in Plato’s cave that you don’t even realise…
Of course, as admin, you have the capability to ban me. But that wouldn’t make you right. That would only prove you wrong.
You are putting words into people's mouths and I don't like it one bit.
You are obviously NOT familiar with this forum and its members so you just assume that your interlocutors are all the same individual with the same ideas you dislike so much. This isn't helping.
You should know that all your arguments are deeply flawed and partial, because such is as the nature of metaphysical arguments. They are all flawed and yours aren't an exception.
So how about some humility and humor? You should know that your position is just as nonsensical as the one of those who argue that science has an answer for everything.
Besides your arguments are really more commonplaces than anything else.
As I stated previously, none of the proposed explanations for the nature of the universe and of life makes any sense. They all go beyond the realm of our experience and personally I refuse to get enamored with one or the other.
But you want to be concerned with logic. I posted a picture with two sentences and you figured all sorts of conclusions from those. So, I'll ask you, in homage to logic: where would the "flat earth" be sitting on? And what sort of force would keep the astral bodies spinning around it?