lux wrote:^ They replied to the email but all 3 astronauts are uncertain as to how long it will take for them to receive the male enhancement pills they ordered.
NASA KEEPS FOOLING THE WORLD
I submit to everyone's assessment my latest finding concerning the ISS imagery released by NASA. I welcome everyone's comments and, particularly, anyone's objections to the following analysis - as I do sincerely wish (not being a rocket scientist) to make it dead sure that I'm not missing something here:
As no known photographic phenomena can explain why the external modules would DOUBLE their size from one shot to the other (while the porthole size remains unaltered) - the only rational explanation to this, in my opinion, is that we are looking at (sloppily managed) computerized imagery.
Here's the source video from Youtube channel "NASAtelevision" (the two images above are from 5:00 and 5:43) :
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lswCuvcA7YQ
I would honestly appreciate everyone's efforts to either confirm or debunk this finding - as I feel it may be one of the most compelling and easily understood instances of NASA skullduggery (with regards to the ISS) we may me sitting upon right now - in order to wake up a wider public to NASA's astronomical frauds. However, and once again, if someone can debunk this in any way, I am all ears!
Fedge wrote:It seems to be the same porthole in both (the switch between the portholes depict the same stuff).
The stuff seen in the porthole is supposed to be attached to the main thingy right ?
simonshack wrote:Fedge wrote:And the 'stuff seen in the porthole' is of course this rigid assembly - not something that could possibly change its position on the ISS over time, so as to appear larger or smaller through any given porthole:
simonshack wrote: At one stage, there is a pink appendage that pops down from the ceiling - covering the background guy's face.
LightCone wrote:simonshack wrote: At one stage, there is a pink appendage that pops down from the ceiling - covering the background guy's face.
I agree with what you've wrote but the "pink appendage" appears to be the background man's arm. Watch the video from 4:00-4:07.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests