Danny Jowenko: Dead?

[SimonJCP]

Expert Who Concluded WTC 7 Was A Controlled Demolition Killed In Car Accident

http://www.prisonplanet.com/expert-who- ... ident.html

The fake "truther" websites are currently broadcasting the reported 7/16/2011 death of Danny Jowenko around the Internet. Jowenko was a demolitions expert in the Netherlands who was shown a video of the WTC7 demolition and immediately declared it a "controlled demolition".

Here is the three-part "demolition" interview with Jowenko:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3DRhwRN ... r_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sep-HDZo ... re=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boNzLZIn ... r_embedded

His website doesn't appear to be frequently updated. It contains links to documents confirming his credentials. Both links are dead:
http://www.jowenko.com/downloads/ISO-FID-NL_1200.pdf
http://www.jowenko.com/downloads/JFID%20VCA%20NL.pdf


This is one of many 9/11-related stories being reported in the run-up to the 10th anniversary. Others include:

1. The "9/11 Victims" connection to the Murdoch scandal, which came from a second-hand report from an anonymous private detective who was "formerly" an NYPD officer and has been "used by American journalists" in the past. One wonders why a private detective would want to keep their identity a secret. Especially when they have a history of being a media asset. In other words, the story has literally nothing behind it and comes from an inexplicably anonymous, quite possibly non-existent person with NYPD/Media connections.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/2011/07/11/phon ... -23262694/

2. The reported death of Steven Mosiello, a "9/11 firefighter" who witnessed victims, jumpers, and reported hearing a plane fly into the South Tower. His wife, Ginger, works for Newsday. His brother is a lawyer for Vision Capital, an investment advisory firm with ties to Communist China, MIT, CFR, and The Arkin Group (a private intelligence firm with VERY spooky connections).
http://www.ny1.com/content/special_repo ... -of-cancer
http://www.spoke.com/info/pEptPPE/GingerMosiello
http://www.rocketlawyer.com/profiles/vi ... IELLO.aspx
http://www.visicap.com/team.php

3. The case (and recent execution) of Mark Anthony Stroman, a member of the Aryan Brotherhood who allegedly killed men he thought were Arabs after 9/11 because he was upset that his half-sister died in the upper floors of the North Tower. His sister's death could not be confirmed. In other words, he couldn't provide a name that showed up on any of the memorial lists and his "victim" story is a fraud.
http://.go.com/US/story?id=1726215&page=1

Two photographs have been released:





Thoughts?

[SimonJCP]

Also note:

-Is it a coincidence or a joke that the car appears to have crashed in front of a car park?

-Shouldn't there be car parts visible around the tree?

[SimonJCP]

The grass in front of the tree is completely undamaged. How could a car crash into that tree without damaging the grass?

[SmokingGunII]

Hi SimonJCP - good to see you back!

There is no doubt the "9/11" stories are being cranked up as the 10th anniversary approaches. My responses to your observations are as follows:

Blue light - let's give the benefit of the doubt as this light could have been switched off when the 2nd photo was taken.
Tree damage - This doesn't look like damage caused by a car - what made the isolated high mark?
Grass damage - inconcievable that there is no disturbance or wheel marks. The grass is wet & lush. Northern Europe hasn't had a drought in July, but plenty of rain.

Last observation: The Dutch drive on the right, so we must assume he has lost control and veered ACROSS the road into the tree before careering up the road to where it comes to rest. Why are there no tyre marks visible on the road.

Conclusion: Accident did not happen at location and has been staged.

Question: Was Jowenko part of the original plan which concentrated on the fate of B7 as the big conspiracy rather than the physic defying events across the road? If so, is he actually dead or retired?

[brianv]

Pretty puny tree. The damage looks a bit inconsistent with being hit by a car.

Now take a 200ft wide, quarter of a mile high tree and make it from steel and fly an airplane against it!

Which way is it to be?

[pov603]

It could be consistent with veering across the road, hitting the tree and ending up further on down the road as depicted in the photograph.
I have hit a tree head on in an accident which wrote the car off that i was driving which was actually owned by a friend of mine and for which i was subsequently prosecuted [DUI] 30 years ago and there was hardly a mark on the tree yet the front of the car was completely caved in.
So let us give them the benefit of the doubt on this one.